I agree with your contention in Para 4 & Para 5. I concentrate for WB. I already have all of them tabulated as per affidavits, each candidate declared, available on ADR facebook. The comparative Table is appended hereunder-
The most surprising Ethics Score accredited “Excellent (No Charges)” a/c. Tapas Paul even after the most recent fracas appearing in print & electronic media, as your report is datelined 17 July. As per his own affidavit, he has 4 nos of cases pending against him under IPC 34 (Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention) and 188 (Disobedience to order duly promulgated by public servant). As a corollary to the recent episode, he
I agree with your contention in Para 4 & Para 5. I concentrate for WB. I already have all of them tabulated as per affidavits, each candidate declared, available on ADR facebook. The comparative Table is appended hereunder-
The most surprising Ethics Score accredited “Excellent (No Charges)” a/c. Tapas Paul even after the most recent fracas appearing in print & electronic media, as your report is datelined 17 July. As per his own affidavit, he has 4 nos of cases pending against him under IPC 34 (Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention) and 188 (Disobedience to order duly promulgated by public servant). As a corollary to the recent episode, he
I agree with your contention in Para 4 & Para 5. I concentrate for WB. I already have all of them tabulated as per affidavits, each candidate declared available on ADR facebook. The comparative Table is appended hereunder-
The most surprising Ethics Score accredited “Excellent (No Charges)” a/c. Tapas Paul even after the most recent fracas appearing in print & electronic media, as your report is datelined 17 July. As per his own affidavit, he has 4 nos of cases pending against him under IPC 34 (Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention) and 188 (Disobedience to order duly promulgated by public servant). As a corollary to the recent episode, he
I agree with your contention in Para 4 & Para 5. I concentrate for WB. I already have all of them tabulated as per affidavits, each candidate declared available on ADR facebook. The comparative Table is appended hereunder-
The most surprising Ethics Score accredited “Excellent (No Charges)” a/c. Tapas Paul even after the most recent fracas appearing in print & electronic media, as your report is datelined 17 July. As per his own affidavit, he has 4 nos of cases pending against him under IPC 34 (Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention) and 188 (Disobedience to order duly promulgated by public servant). As a corollary to the recent episode, he
I agree with your contention in Para 4 & Para 5. I concentrate for WB. I already have all of them tabulated as per affidavits, each candidate declared available on ADR facebook. The comparative Table is appended hereunder-
The most surprising Ethics Score accredited “Excellent (No Charges)” a/c. Tapas Paul even after the most recent fracas appearing in print & electronic media, as your report is datelined 17 July. As per his own affidavit, he has 4 nos of cases pending against him under IPC 34 (Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention) and 188 (Disobedience to order duly promulgated by public servant). As a corollary to the recent episode, he
I agree with your contention in Para 4 & Para 5. I concentrate for WB. I already have all of them tabulated as per affidavits, each candidate declared available on ADR facebook. The comparative Table is appended hereunder-
The most surprising Ethics Score accredited “Excellent (No Charges)” a/c. Tapas Paul even after the most recent fracas appearing in print & electronic media, as your report is datelined 17 July. As per his own affidavit, he has 4 nos of cases pending against him under IPC 34 (Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention) and 188 (Disobedience to order duly promulgated by public servant). As a corollary to the recent episode, he
