I feel we have been talking and blogging enough now. Do you people who religiously comment here go and vote. If that had been done, India would have not been in this state under the hands of MaunMohan.
I feel we have been talking and blogging enough now. Do you people who religiously comment here go and vote. If that had been done, India would have not been in this state under the hands of MaunMohan.
Re: action
by Mahendra on Jan 15, 2013 10:48 AM
Harsha: the problem with India is even if all the educated ppl do vote, its hardly gonna make a difference. bcoz the majority of the populace is illiterate who can't think beyond their useless, petty caste politics. so blogging here does not make any difference.
The ground reality is that we r a nation of illiterate ppl who will never learn to call a spade a spade.
voting rights should only be given to those who hold atleast a bachelors degree. For politicians who wish to contest, it should be made mandatory for them to have atleast a post-graduate degree.. also electoral reforms need to be implemented on war footing..
we can write endlessly, but who is gonna take note of all this.....
Indians should be ashamed of themselves that despite such henious acts being committed on our soldiers, we still invite the Fuck1stanis for cricket, hockey, cinema etc and have the choicest words of praise reserved for these tr@itors....
India will be d00med if this is our attitude towards our armed forces...
Govt is treading on thin ice to placate the minorities who seem to be their vote banks, by refraining to attack Fuck1stan which could seriously jeopardise the security of India and the imbalance in South Asia...
If this incident cannot provoke us to go for an all out war with Fuck1stanis, then I don't understand what it takes for India to stand up and give a fitting reply to all those who have been waging a proxy war for the last 3-4 decades...
This is the reason why Unity in Diversity is an utopian concept. A society that is diverse can never be united. India is a prime example.....
The Pakistan Army wants to maintain control. The Generals who have looted their country by maintaining tension with India do not like normalcy with India as it will reduce their power. So whenever any peace process get momentum the Army does something to disturb it. If India declares war or escalates tension the Pak Army is happy because it get its supremacy. It means we are playing into the hands of the Pak Army and doing what exactly the Army wants. Ultimate loser will be India. India should be clever enough to punish only the Pak army without actually engaging in costly war with Pakistan. In India such intelligent people are not available. Either Congress or BJP are are not capable of hatching a shrewd plan of that nature.
Re: The Real problem
by Mahendra on Jan 15, 2013 10:30 AM
these kind of rhetoric from spineless indians, is what has brought us to this abject state of hopelessness.
Re: The Real problem
by Aniket on Jan 15, 2013 10:42 AM
Pakistani Army take own decesion this is indicattion of Army already control on islamabad so dont fool us
Re: Re: The Real problem
by Rajiv Kumar on Jan 15, 2013 10:51 AM
Hey , try to understand Siva's point. Gen. Kayani is delibeatly creating tension so that he can rule Pak which will be really tough as Pak army is pro terrorists opearting on their soil. But , now onwards any vioaltion of ceas fire should be dealt with strongly, agressively. Now, Pakis dont desrve any mercy. As Gen Bikram Singh said we will choose time and place to strike back and he has meaning to say so. I endorse views of others but we have to strike back cautiously without giving any reason to pak army to take control of Political power.
Re: Re: Re: The Real problem
by Aniket on Jan 15, 2013 10:57 AM
I am not agree with u USA is not fool Attack on Afganistan and Iraq, After attack on Democratic power more strong in this country. so ur compltely wrong
Re: The Real problem
by mahesh v on Jan 15, 2013 10:59 AM
what you said is right. But we must retaliate... such that the we must capture some territory of pak...like PoK.
So every time a new provokation comes from pak, we should do same.. So they should learn some lesson. But, will our spineless politicians are capable ?
Re: The Real problem
by krishna ramesh on Jan 15, 2013 11:22 AM
LIving shamelesly wacthing the dead bodies of jawans enjoying our freedom wat some people want otherwise the black money will be wasted Die like lion not like slave
Indians should be ashamed of themselves that despite such henious acts being committed on our soldiers, we still invite the Fuck1stanis for cricket, hockey, cinema etc and have the choicest words of praise reserved for these tr@itors....
India will be d00med if this is our attitude towards our armed forces...
Govt is treading on thin ice to placate the minorities who seem to be their vote banks, by refraining to attack Fuck1stan which could seriously jeopardise the security of India and the imbalance in South Asia...
If this incident cannot provoke us to go for an all out war with Fuck1stanis, then I don't understand what it takes for India to stand up and give a fitting reply to all those who have been waging a proxy war for the last 3-4 decades...
This is the reason why Unity in Diversity is an utopian concept. A society that is diverse can never be united. India is a prime example.....
Vivekananda carried 2 books with him - one is the Gita and the other is called The imitation of christ. I am not cooking up this story, please do your research on the net. Vivekananda became famous because of his speech in the US, and that seminar or parliament was funded by elite christians. In fact, the chairman of the committee that organised the parliament was a Christian priest. After that session, Vivekananda stayed back in the US for a few years and received funding from Christians there.
Re: Vivekananda was secular
by individual on Jan 15, 2013 10:17 AM
in other words, he has used them to spread hynduism as indian powerful hyndus were pseudos and wud not do anything for their dharma!
Re: Re: Vivekananda was secular
by seagull on Jan 15, 2013 10:20 AM
In other words, Vivekananda would not have approved of the way certain political parties have staked their claim to his name.
Re: Re: Re: Vivekananda was secular
by individual on Jan 15, 2013 10:27 AM
sorry, that time BJP or any other hyndutva party was not there!RSS itself created in 1925 , where Vivekanda died in 1902, so ur theory got flopped here! i pity of u guys, how long u people will rub the little existence so called hyndutva party who talked only pro-nationalism, is it their sin?
Re: Vivekananda was secular
by Devdutt Sen on Jan 15, 2013 10:19 AM
who said no? why are you trying to get focussed on christianity ? Vivekananda was a great saint and a great Indian, thats all. Thats the focus
Re: Re: Vivekananda was secular
by seagull on Jan 15, 2013 10:25 AM
Who said no. But if supporters of certain political parties use Vivekananda as a symbol of hindutva, and hide behind that symbol to attack other religions, then my point will give them some perspective.
Re: Re: Re: Vivekananda was secular
by individual on Jan 15, 2013 10:28 AM
sorry, that time BJP or any other hyndutva party was not there!RSS itself created in 1925 , where Vivekanda died in 1902, so ur theory got flopped here! i pity of u guys, how long u people will rub the little existence so called hyndutva party who talked only pro-nationalism, is it their sin?
Re: Re: Vivekananda was secular
by seagull on Jan 15, 2013 10:27 AM
Promoting equality of religions sir and some perspective hopefully, neither christianity nor hinduism on my agenda
Re: Re: Re: Vivekananda was secular
by individual on Jan 15, 2013 10:30 AM
my foot, u r a crystyan and crystyan also tries to malign other relegeon people with them to get a rope ladder to climb! shame on uScumbugs convarts!
Re: Vivekananda was secular
by Pen diamond on Jan 15, 2013 10:42 AM
Mr Seagull, I dont think he carried these two books with him always. And even if he did carry it, he had apposed the intoleratnt ways of the abrahamic R_eligions
Swamiji once observed "there is no denser presence of low-lifers/folk devils (tamasik) in the world than in india" & we won't need to go far in search of living proof evidenced by some of the posts here on rediff.
