Re: Who is ur opponent MMS?
by Vinod Pandey on Dec 07, 2013 04:49 PM
PM MMS was considered one of the most honest politicians and a good economist. It was during his first term as MP. But unfortunately his cabinet colleagues have let him down barring a very few like Defence Minister Anthony. Some coalition partners tried to fleece the country fearing not coming of UPA 3rd time due to a rejuvenated BJP and Modi factor later on. PM's fault is he didn't check the rot in time and started behaving like a politician trying to save his corrupt minsters tooth and nail. He even faltered at one press conference when after an emotional speech he turned back and smiled and asked his colleague "How was that". That showed that he is also like other politicians who believe in gimmicks. He also failed to protect honest bureaucrats like Khmeka and Durgashakti leaving them to get butchered at the hands of unscrupulous politicians in UP and Haryana. People believe Modi despite some shortcomings is best suited to cleanse the Indian politics and stem the rot. Hence we must say Assembly elections are Semifinal and Modi factor is to be watched. Con. Men says there is no Modi wave but the same people blamed Modi for BJP's defeat in Karnatka and Uttrakhand (though very narrow margin).That time he was not declared PM candi. Now wins should also be attributed to him. Despite real dangers He held many impressive rallies in all 4 states. If BJP forms a Govt. at centre Uttrakhand and Jharkhand dynamics will change suddenly. This is waiting to happen.
Re: Re: Who is ur opponent MMS?
by ganesh pai on Dec 07, 2013 05:26 PM
I agree with u vinod, that MMS was honest and loyal. this two was his strong quality. Now his honesty is at bay after the coal scam and his ir-responsible statement " i m not the custodian of coal files" which was stashed from PMO- if u cant even take care of files,at a time the probe is superwised by honble supreme court of India what u care for the country?? He is no doubt, loyal only to Sonia but he isnt that for India. 'PM' is the highest power of our nation, he spoiled its value and was a 'chaparasi' for sonia and her son. You will see after LS polls how modi will use that chair on protecting common man's interest and to make our country strong and safe.
Re: Re: Who is ur opponent MMS?
by Hebbar R on Dec 07, 2013 06:17 PM
It does not matter if MMS was honest. The sad truth is that he presided over one of the most corrupt Govts ever that India has seen. As PM, if he had had the interest of the nation as he claims, he should have put his foot down and ensured a corruption free Govt. He is surely not a person who needs to be after power. If he was incapable of doing what he in all morality should have, he must have made a dignified exit from his post. People would have remembered hims for that for ever.
DO YOU ALL STILL REMEMBER-- 1) Commonwealth scam 2) 2G Scam 3) Coal scam 4) Special Jija G Scam 5) Rupee's fall into inferno 6) Betrayal of Jan Lokpal movement of Anna 7) 40 different .. Diesel/Petrol/gas price hikes in 5 years 8) "Missing" of Coal Scam files 9) Ramlila Maidan lathi-charge at midnight 10) Assam/Mujaffarnagar Riots 11) Chinese army entering Ladakh and Arunachal Pradesh and sitting there for months 12) Railway uncle - nephew bribary case 13) KHANgress using its CAGED PARROT "CBI" to continue ruling the nation 14) Zero Loss Sibal .. and Salman .. the handicap robber 15) Water splashes and danda on youth asking for the safety of women at India Gate 16) Pakistani PM having Biryani lunch in Ajmer, 17) Pakistanis crossing border and cutting heads of Indian Jawans 18) Ashok Khemka's transfer and humiliation after he exposed "JIJAJI" 19) Rs 5 to Rs 12 full stomach food .........
INDIA's WEAKNESS IS INDIA's BAD MEMORY.. BUT THE SAME IS THE LIFELINE OF KHANGRESSPSEUDO SICKULARS FOR THE PAST 60 YEARS.... !!!!!
Re: INDIA's WEAKNESS IS HINDUS FORGIVING NATURE AND BAD MEMORY -
by Vinod Pandey on Dec 07, 2013 04:41 PM
PM MMS was considered one of the most honest politicians and a good economist. It was during his first term as MP. But unfortunately his cabinet colleagues have let him down barring a very few like Defence Minister Anthony. Some coalition partners tried to fleece the country fearing not coming of UPA 3rd time due to a rejuvenated BJP and Modi factor later on. PM's fault is he didn't check the rot in time and started behaving like a politician trying to save his corrupt minsters tooth and nail. He even faltered at one press conference when after an emotional speech he turned back and smiled and asked his colleague "How was that". That showed that he is also like other politicians who believe in gimmicks. He also failed to protect honest bureaucrats like Khmeka and Durgashakti leaving them to get butchered at the hands of unscrupulous politicians in UP and Haryana. People believe Modi despite some shortcomings is best suited to cleanse the Indian politics and stem the rot. Hence we must say Assembly elections are Semifinal and Modi factor is to be watched. Con. Men says there is no Modi wave but the same people blamed Modi for BJP's defeat in Karnatka and Uttrakhand (though very narrow margin).That time he was not declared PM candi. Now wins should also be attributed to him. Despite real dangers He held many impressive rallies in all 4 states. If BJP forms a Govt. at centre Uttrakhand and Jharkhand dynamics will change suddenly. This is waiting to happen.
Re: Re: INDIA's WEAKNESS IS HINDUS FORGIVING NATURE AND BAD MEMOR
by Vinod Pandey on Dec 07, 2013 05:01 PM
In fact people think giving a second term to Dr Singh as PMM was a fault at the part of Congress High Command. CHC took credit for all good things of the Govt. and left Singh to defend himself for all wrong doings of his Ministers. In fact if during UPA 2 Rahul Gandhi was made PM it would had been good for Congress. Keeping a frail. mumbling, slows energy less waiving hands and walk and no impressive countenance like personality at the helm had eaten up the basic foundation of the Govt. Small countries showing dadgiri and strong China threatening India all these years has totally erased the hallow around the Govt and PM. It is called total ruin of the Iqbal of a Govt. Now people want total change not just the change of UPA leadership. In fact late flaunting of RG as would be PM has proved counterproductive and now after a disastrous performance by him in Assembly election rallies has eroded the Iqbal of Congress party too. Bullshit utterances by some Cong Ministers, small time actor Babbar, coalition partners turncoats like Beni Pd. and late friends like JDU leaders has further proved the proverbial albatross around the neck of the GOP and the Govt.
Wish the Govt takes the nation seriously first. For that the Govt must act in national interest rather than the interest of allies and electoral gains.
MMS says that people are dissatisfied with a 5% growth rate. The truth is that the Aam Aadmi does not care about growth. For him, the issue is one of survival. He is woriied about the prices, corruption, etc. The Govt just does not seem to be answering this rathr it is harping on growth.
MMS has talked about issues during the regime of PVN, if only the focus then was to encourage exports, India would not have been in the kind of situation it is now in. Sadly, even now there is no focus on exports. The Govt only wants FDI in all spheres of activity all meant to boost internal consumption. Is that how China has managed its economy?
Re: PM on Modi: I take my opponents very seriously
by Vinod Pandey on Dec 07, 2013 05:08 PM
by Vinod Pandey (View MyPage) on Dec 07, 2013 05:01 PM In fact people think giving a second term to Dr Singh as PMM was a fault at the part of Congress High Command. CHC took credit for all good things of the Govt. and left Singh to defend himself for all wrong doings of his Ministers. In fact if during UPA 2 Rahul Gandhi was made PM it would had been good for Congress. Keeping a frail,mumbling, slow, energy less waiving hands and walk and no impressive countenance like personality at the helm had destroyed some good performance in the form of NAREGA and RTI. Small countries showing dadgiri and strong China threatening India all these years has totally erased the halo around the Govt and the PM. It is called total ruin of the Iqbal of a Govt. Now people want total change not just the change of UPA leadership. In fact late flaunting of RG as would be PM has proved counterproductive and now after a disastrous performance by him in Assembly election rallies has eroded the Iqbal of Congress party too. Bullshit utterances by some Cong Ministers, small time actor Babbar, coalition partners turncoats like Beni Pd. and late friends like JDU leaders has further proved the proverbial albatross around the neck of the GOP and the Govt.
Re: Re: PM on Modi: I take my opponents very seriously
by Hebbar R on Dec 07, 2013 06:24 PM
There was nothing worthwhile in UPA2. The problems sown during UPA1 started showing in UPA2. So, in that, it gets clear that MMS as a PM was a total mistake. Would RG have been a better choice? a big NO. He has till date not articulated his views on serious issues. IOs it sufficient to just talk some mumble jumble in front of purchased crowds? Does India need such kind of leadership? The man does not know what he is speaking. He talks of escape velocity of Jupiter in an election meet.
It is time PM ManMAUNsingh takes his position as PM seriously and take appropriate steps for revival of indian economy. He should seriously now think that he has self respect and declare that he will never work under totally inexperienced and not properly educated Rahul Gandhi. He should also seriously think that he is not a puppet and work by remote control and see that he should be ignored by any of his minister and has to strictly follow his instruction.
Re: I take my opponents seriously
by P S on Dec 07, 2013 03:52 PM
It should be read "he should not be ignored by any of his ministers and they have to strictly follow only his instructions.
as our PM said, we need to look into the big picture for what ever we have achived and what ever we have lost and then conclude. At times, i feel actions speak louder than words...probably we will have to wait for another 4 or 5 years to really know what he was doing all these years??good or bad...cos i remember during his tenure as FM he was criticised in a similar way.......and now we know what he did during those days
Re: looks like our pm is breaking his silence
by Vinod Pandey on Dec 07, 2013 04:47 PM
PM MMS was considered one of the most honest politicians and a good economist. It was during his first term as MP. But unfortunately his cabinet colleagues have let him down barring a very few like Defence Minister Anthony. Some coalition partners tried to fleece the country fearing not coming of UPA 3rd time due to a rejuvenated BJP and Modi factor later on. PM's fault is he didn't check the rot in time and started behaving like a politician trying to save his corrupt minsters tooth and nail. He even faltered at one press conference when after an emotional speech he turned back and smiled and asked his colleague "How was that". That showed that he is also like other politicians who believe in gimmicks. He also failed to protect honest bureaucrats like Khmeka and Durgashakti leaving them to get butchered at the hands of unscrupulous politicians in UP and Haryana. People believe Modi despite some shortcomings is best suited to cleanse the Indian politics and stem the rot. Hence we must say Assembly elections are Semifinal and Modi factor is to be watched. Con. Men says there is no Modi wave but the same people blamed Modi for BJP's defeat in Karnatka and Uttrakhand (though very narrow margin).That time he was not declared PM candi. Now wins should also be attributed to him. Despite real dangers He held many impressive rallies in all 4 states. If BJP forms a Govt. at centre Uttrakhand and Jharkhand dynamics will change suddenly. This is waiting to happen.
Re: looks like our pm is breaking his silence
by Hebbar R on Dec 07, 2013 06:33 PM
Ok. What did he do as Finance Minister? He opeened up India for investments from foreign companies. India was a virgin market for them and they all came with lots of money for investments. Now, what was these investments for? Only internal consumption!! There was nothing that would prevent the flight of this very capital, as happened recently, for the money did not belong to India. What India needed then was a healthy mix of internal consumption and exports. Exports that would earn India the needed FE. Did MMS do that as Finance Minister. Just think about it. If he had done that back in 1992, by now India would have been much healthier with its own FE. The present CAD crisis would never have happened. Sadly, even now the right direction is not being thought of. The Govt is only talking about FDI, which once again is a repeat of 1992. Has the liberalisation reduced red-tape? a big NO. MMS himself has said so yesterday. So, what is the great thing that he is supposed to have done back in 1992?
