Didint the girls know who Thackreyji was, their post was on purpose and was just to tease the shiv sena, shiv sena should not get demoralised by the police report but dig out as to whose playing the game and propping this up in the media
Re: Shivsena becomes stronger
by ab karkare on Nov 24, 2012 10:17 AM
u joker call urself indian and support shivsena's gundagardi..shame on ppl like u who divide India
Whay was this media not so active during the Taslima issue, why didnt govt panelist's & sickularists & other freedom champions not raise the pitch against those who insulted and didnt allow TAslima to come to India, shame on such baised media
Who called the bandh on demise of BALASAHEB , there was no bandh people participated in the procession can this stopped by media or some fanatics. It is really surprising how Maharashtra govt is is demoralizing Maharashtra Police . Case was in court already decision should have been left with court to withdraw rather than Maharashtra govt. which means every time crime occurs in Maharashtra or anywhere in India first appoint IG to do investigation then file case which means we should only have IGs in police and remove all others police officers
Re: Bandh
by SB Goilkar on Nov 24, 2012 10:36 AM
In fact the girl's comment was not correct. People like Balasaheb are not born everyday and Shiv Sena never called bandh. The bandh was observed by people as a respect to great Balasaheb.
Re: Re: Bandh
by SRINIVASAN RAMAN on Nov 24, 2012 10:50 AM
I was surprised when I saw BALASAHEB,death mourning at Hosur (Tamil Nadu several other places ) He is great...
Re: Re: Re: Bandh
by netholi on Nov 24, 2012 11:02 AM
no Tamilian who is having self respect will never mourn with this person 's death. with due repsect telling that the same bal takare thrown our south indians including Tamilians from Bombay in 70's
Re: Re: Bandh
by Spot On on Nov 24, 2012 12:36 PM
Golikar, I support your statement that people like Balasaheb doesn't born everyday; I respect him. But the Bandh was forced at many places by Shiv Sainiks; after coming back from home post-Diwali, I went mad because I could not manage a single pouch of milk for my 2 Yr old daughter. I stay in Kharghar, Navi Mumbai. At least in Kharhgar, the Bandh was forced.
Why rediff is giving a headline that is inciting type while the comment is not!?. The FB comment by girls is not at all a anti-thackeray as the headline indicates!. Its only anti-bandh!. Media should be careful and should not distort facts.
Re: Its not anti-thackeray, its anti-bandh comment!
by VENKATESWARAN VISWANATHAN on Nov 24, 2012 10:05 AM
I fully endorse your view Mr. DSouza. In this case not only the local police but also the entire press section for commercialising the incident and making a mockery of press freedom. It is a shame on the press as well because there was no political pressure on them unlike the police.
What the Policeman was saying as per my view was in line with preserving peace. The persons who should be prosecuted are the Shiv Sainiks. The Police should register cases against them
You don't need an IG report for this? Even a school kid will know as to what is right and what is wrong?Pl read the HC Judges remarks on the lajpath Nagar,N Delhi Market Blast case?
Rediff journos need training on reporting. FB remark was no way against BT but showed her desperation of being hauled up at home because of Bandh. Behave like a good citizen of a civilised society. Don't create confusion for the sake of peace and harmony among us. BTW, is there any act to stop such methods of reporting by journos?
Re: Wrong heading- Rediff
by Nagarkatti A on Nov 24, 2012 08:47 AM
If anybody, the first people to be arrested and put in jail should be the meida persons who deliberately write provocative articles and provocative titles.
Power for Government to take possession of licensed telegraphs and to order interception of messages. � (1) On the occurrence of any public emergency, or in the interest of the public safety, the Central Government or a State Government or any officer specially authorized in this behalf by the Central Government or a State Government may, if satisfied that it is necessary or expedient so to do, take temporary possession (for so long as the public emergency exists or the interest of the public safety requires the taking of such action) of any telegraph established, maintained or worked by any person licensed under this Act.
(2) On the occurrence of any public emergency, or in the interest of the public safety, the Central Government or a State Government or any officer specially authorized in this behalf by the Central Government or a State Government may, if satisfied that it is necessary or expedient so to do in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States or public order or for preventing incitement to the commission of an offence, for reasons to be recorded in writing, by order, direct that any message or class of messages to or from any person or class of persons, or relating to any particular subject, brought for transmission by or transmitted or received by any telegraph, shall not be transmitted, or shall be intercepted or detained, or shall be disclosed to the Government ?
Re: Indian Telegraph Act 1885
by pravin sarode on Nov 24, 2012 08:06 AM
(2) On the occurrence of any public emergency, or in the interest of the public safety, the Central Government or a State Government or any officer specially authorized in this behalf by the Central Government or a State Government may, if satisfied that it is necessary or expedient so to do in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States or public order or for preventing incitement to the commission of an offence, for reasons to be recorded in writing, by order, direct that any message or class of messages to or from any person or class of persons, or relating to any particular subject, brought for transmission by or transmitted or received by any telegraph, shall not be transmitted, or shall be intercepted or detained, or shall be disclosed to the Government making the order or an officer thereof mentioned in the order:
Provided that press messages intended to be published in India of correspondents accredited to the Central Government or a State Government shall not be intercepted or detained, unless their transmission has been prohibited under this sub-section. (1) If any person establishes, maintains or works a telegraph within [India] in contravention of the provisions of section 4 or otherwise than as permitted by rules made under that section, he shall be punished, if the telegraph is a wireless telegraph, with imprisonment which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with b
Re: Re: Indian Telegraph Act 1885
by pravin sarode on Nov 24, 2012 08:59 AM
Unlawfully attempting to learning the contents of messages � If any person does any of the acts mentioned in section 23 with the intention of unlawfully learning the contents of any message, or of committing any offence punishable under this Act, he may (in addition to the fine with which he is punishable under section 23) be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year.
25. Intentionally damaging or tampering with telegraphs � If any person, intending �
a) to prevent or obstruct the transmission or delivery of any message, or
b) to intercept or to acquaint himself with the contents of any message, or
c) to commit mischief,
damages, removes, tampers with or touches any battery, machinery, telegraph line, post or other thing whatever, being part of or used in or about any telegraph or in the working thereof,
he shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine or with both. Misconduct � If any telegraph officer, or any person not being a telegraph officer but having official duties connected with any office which is used as a telegraph office is guilty of any at of drunkenness, carelessness of other misconduct whereby the correct transmission or the delivery of any message is impeded or delayed or if telegraph officer loiters or delays in the transmission or delivery of any message, he shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may exten
