SRK is a liability for India for more reasons than one :
1) His cousin as ISI deputy chief has key role in hiding Osama and sending 26/11 terrorists.
2) Islamist ideologues also make mockery of the concept affinity to nation.
3)Past examples of films & stars being under complete control of Dawood and ISI are very visible.
4)SRK also has his " My Name is Khan " ideology which tries to whitewash the glaring global issue.
5)Living on the edge of law - always hitting fellow Indians and promoting Pakis interest in India in cricket , in movies , in real life.
6) Tremendous capacity to buy out media and politicians to get awards and direct access to power.
The above are clear and distinct points about SRK and not prejudice based on usual ones such as birthplace in Pakistan or delibrately marrying a Hindu woman.
Re: SRK a huge liability for India - anyday a crisis can happen.
by Incredible India on Mar 11, 2012 02:29 PM
Advani is an ISI Agent:- 1> He is the one who dig a deep trench in unity of INdia in 1992 on advise of his ISI leaders; Before 1992, ISI never got even few require people support from India which was needed to do 1blast inside INdia and hence we saw that there were no such incident in India before however Advani's action made some weaker section of the minority got carried away and got brain washed; 2>Advani the so called Iron man did nothing when the hijacked plane was at Amritsar for 45 minutes enough for any commando operation; 3>Advani released 3 7errorist with money and then later said that he forgot whether he was in that meeting or not :D; 4>He is the one whose true color was visible when he went to Pak and praise Jinnah...
its about prespective in which you look people... that is why Law requires proof...
Re: Re: SRK a huge liability for India - anyday a crisis can happ
by whatswrongpeople on Mar 11, 2012 02:39 PM
Ur ccamels tail on fire.......hehehehehe
Re: Re: Re: SRK a huge liability for India - anyday a crisis can
by Incredible India on Mar 11, 2012 02:44 PM
You are right it hurts too only those who are patriots when called traitors; people who claims to be patriot but are farce just cant understand
Re: Re: Re: Re: SRK a huge liability for India - anyday a crisis
by jaggu on Mar 11, 2012 02:59 PM
Jinna's idea of opting out of India was honest - but our national leaders should not have had to divide our motherland - they could have sent him ou to the desert on a camel.
Re: Re: Nonsense
by Incredible India on Mar 11, 2012 04:28 PM
I used to wake up early morning to see Aus vs South Africa cricket match being played in Australia? Sports know no boundaries.. if u r a sport lover u do understand;;
What has always fascinated me in this country is the collective stand by mu-slimes when it comes to hindwho and the nonchalance by hindwho even when it is about protecting their culture and their own men. Not just nonchalance but I see many hindwho stand for mu-slimes and their rights and ready go up against their own hindwho brethren, but rarely, hardly, almost never, i have seen a mu-slime go against their own flock or support a hindwho even remotely.
Cant tell if its the clannishness of mu-slimes or the waywardness of hindwhos.
Also significantly I notice that when it comes to hindwho accusation and bashing all christ-ians and muslims and dalits and atheists (mynorities) join together but i also see hindwhos fighting for the rights of others by forsaking their own.
Wonder if its magnanimity on the part of hindwho's or its just their ignorance, stupidity and naiveness.
Re: my observation
by Jacky Jackson on Mar 11, 2012 01:22 PM
Because they are simply fools and selfish want to acquire only materialism, neglecting principles of their religion,they fight on castes and want to help the enemies of their religion always.The days of their race are numbered with constant attack by others and they supporting others rather than own race!!
Re: my observation
by Incredible India on Mar 11, 2012 02:33 PM
That should be like that only; Bcoz Secular definition is India is obviously that majority should protect minority; and that is practical too... it is the responsibility of majority to protect minority if you want democracy.
Re: Re: my observation
by Ram Sharma on Mar 11, 2012 05:00 PM
noone should need anyone's protection. secularism means govt should not take any no decision based on any religion, nor should it favour any religion.
Now it is confirmed how the German Bakery Bomb blast took place... Due to behest of the then Government, SRK made all policemen of that to guard his posters of MNIK and also to guard cinema halls all over the state... And when police were busy, terrorists got a chance to blast a bomb at German Bakery Pune... CBI investigation should be done..
