The people of India have right to know the contents of "so called secret" files like that of Subhash Chandrabose, 1962 war commission etc... after 50-60 years, govt. cannot hide these under the pretext of strategic values.
It is a shame that common basic needs are sold by the government in public places after 65 years of Independence.
Even for easing and for urinating you have to pay in Railway stations and bus stands.This is our government.
When a railway or bus ticket is purchased by a person, he should be eligible to get every basic need of human being irrespective of his status, till he completes his journey.
Even in Hotels, restaurants,Public malls people are required to shed money for relieving themselves which is beyond the control of humans in this world including world leaders.
At Railway Stations and Bus stands, they are looting public in the name of providing parking facility to public.
This is very enigmatic.We know that Netaji took help from Hitler and was in the process of persuading Nazis to attack Britsh settlement in India,It did not happen as Hitler was crushed by allied forces.Britain too was not financially strong to waste its resources over India,they chose South Africa with Diamond mines. This is the truth without patriotic biasing. As for Netaji he fled to Singapore than to Japan but met an unfortunate accident.If Netaji had succeeded in his plans we would have been enslaved again by Germans like Indonesia.How very Fortunate for India.
There is a systematic feeding of only partial information about the freedom struggle that only because of satyagraha movement led by gandhiji India got freedom, which is wrong. Though bose and his followers and others like bhagat singh etc also played a role, again that is also not the reason why british left India. It is a combination of many factors that resulted in India's freedom, the primary reason was that the british empire was in deep trouble after the end of second world war though the allies won the war. Britain had almost collapsed and it was not possible for britain to hold its grip over its colonies due to the very bad condition it was in after the end of the world war. They had to leave their colonies one by one out of sheer helplessness. Otherwise why would the british who were the most cruel and merciless gift away India to some fellows who just sat on fast ? Everybody knows that those who sit on fast will stop fasting after a few days, so why care much about it ? Congress people managed to fool the indian public with false information and managed to rule india for so long slowly and gradually converting the control to one family rule. Indian public was innocent and foolish for quite long and now with education levels improving Indians have starting thinking and that is the result multiparty system is developing and coalitions are happening.
Re: why british left India
by Navi Reyd on Aug 20, 2012 11:58 PM
British were the most cruel and merciless? Really? Wasn't it the British who: 1) united India 2) gave India a fine infrastructure 3) left India with an excellent parliamentary system 4) abolished the inhuman practice of "sati" 5) built India's two largest cities, Bombay & Calcutta 6) gifted India with the English language, because of their good knowledge of which, Indians are so successful all over the world? etc., etc. India, as we know it today, would never have existed, had it not been for the British.
Re: Re: why british left India
by Sridhar n on Aug 21, 2012 12:15 AM
FYI, 1) united India -- British did not united India, while Britishers leaving they splited India into more than 600 coutires, Sardar Patel who took intiation to merge all states into Indian territory only the Kashmir handled by the great Nehru. 2) gave India a fine infrastructure -- Oher than the places where Britishers need transport from India to Britan no where Britished improved infrastucture. 3) left India with an excellent parliamentary system -- current parlament system developed after the independence, FYI centuries earlier itself there was good governing system in India, refer the history 4) abolished the inhuman practice of "sati" -- there is no historic evideneces British faught agaianst inhuman practicies, our freedom figheters Lala Lajpathrai, Veereshalingam fought agianst inhuman practices
5) built India's two largest cities, Bombay & Calcutta -- Centuries ago itself India shined, British destryed our local system for their ruling.
6) gifted India with the English language, because of their good knowledge of which, Indians are so successful all over the world? -- they did not gifted, they want cream of the Indians to communicate to English to serve them for that they distroyed our gurukul system and introduced Makhale education system by which still India sufferinh.
Stop thinking slavary and comeout from slavary thoughts
Re: Re: Re: why british left India
by Navi Reyd on Aug 21, 2012 02:07 AM
That is why Tirthankar Roy in his book "The Economic History of India" wrote: The British "appear to have done far more than what its predecessor regimes and contemporary Indian regimes were able to do".
Re: Re: Re: Re: why british left India
by sanatan upadhaya on Aug 21, 2012 06:07 AM
Compared to Lootgress Chorgress NoProgress Party British was better. That's why b4 leaving they left 2 useless agents Mohammed Koward Gandhi who was a very devoted slave and Janowarlal Nehru who cretaed the Kashmir problem to pleas his Master British.
