The diary of the World War Two Prime Minister of Imperial Japan, General Tojo, was made public by his wife, as per his wishes, many years after he was hanged in 1948 for war crimes. There were reports in some Japanese newspapers that in his diary, General Tojo had written that India was to be taken by Japan with the assistance of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose and the Indian National army, and after this was accomplished, Bose was to be executed. This item of news did not speak well for Bose, and was therefore surpressed by the Government of India as well as the Indian media. The sum of it all was that Bose joined the wrong forces, and had to pay dearly for his folly.
Re: Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose overrated?
by anuj agarwal on Aug 20, 2012 03:18 PM
What ever. No harm de classifying the files relating to him. Let us know and judge the right and wrong. Surely Netaji would have not agreed to a truncated India and not cowed down by Britishers for a sham democracy and divided India
Re: Re: Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose overrated?
by Navi Reyd on Aug 21, 2012 02:18 AM
The partition of India was not a British idea. Jinnah and the Muslim League demanded a separate homeland for Muslims, and this was agreed to by the Indian leaders of that time. The British merely implemented it, but gained nothing from it.
Re: Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose overrated?
by Dipak Bose on Aug 20, 2012 03:25 PM
Netaji has joined the right force at his time. He went first to Stalin, only then to Hitler and then to Tojo, but in August,1945 he went back to the Soviet Union, facilitated by Japan. He knew that the Soviet Union was the only friend of India. Japan was a temporary friend.
Re: Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose overrated?
by aam admi on Aug 20, 2012 11:22 AM
Neta ji Subhash was aware of this fact, and had his precautions , using enemy of enemy was the only solution to abolish British Rule from India. He prferred to leave India, to avoid Gandhi's policies of non-violence, to over throw the British Rule in India by using force against them.In international politics no one is permanent foe or friend, this was known to Neta ji, Mr.Navi. Please avoid commenting on Subhash with your half known facts. I smell in it a anti-national tinge.
Re: Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose overrated?
by mumbai on Aug 20, 2012 11:26 AM
Story by british. Do you want to know about lies of british during war. Read Tony Blaird's dossier on Iraq under saddam hussain.
Re: Re: Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose overrated?
by Cool Indian on Aug 20, 2012 04:57 PM
Good comment,our mk gaandhi was a british creation and good marketing etchniques with dirty trick of nonviolence made all hindus and indians morrons and ennuchs forever too, what a shame!
Re: Re: Re: Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose overrated?
by Navi Reyd on Aug 21, 2012 02:20 AM
That is why Mahatma Gandhi is the most respected Indian all over the world and in India today.
Re: Re: Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose overrated?
by Navi Reyd on Aug 21, 2012 02:29 AM
Hope you are not a supporter of Saddam Hussein. Never forget that he: 1) was a despot 2) tyrannised his people 3) poison-gassed the Kurds 4) poison-gassed Iranian troops 5) invaded and looted Kuwait, and set Kuwaiti oil fields on fire 6) lobbed Scud missiles at Israel and Saudi Arabia 7) threatened to use innocent people as human shields 8) financed and gave succour to known terrorists 9) thumbed his nose at the United Nations 10) killed political dissidents, Shites, and even his own sons-in-law 11) stole U.S. $ 40 billion from thr Iraqi people
had we had mobile phones wid 0.5 mega pixel camera some 67yrs back u wud see mahipal maderna-bhavri devi type clips on youtube of our nehrutopiwala and mrs edwina mountbatton, bose likes to call a lundur a lundur, that the reason kangress does not want it out.
yes he was the ture INDIAN and congress's Nehru, Gandhi were no where near him so these thugs corroborated with brittishers to eliminate him/ dump him we dont have even a fraction of respect for congress and bjp ortheir agpect is 0 % ents nehru gandhi were traitors and got rewarded by britishers for doing chamchagiri of mountbaiten and co
Re: truth about neajit
by mumbai on Aug 20, 2012 11:24 AM
Bose went to Germany and secured the support of Hitler. Hitler helped to run a goverment in exile under bose. It was Free Indian Gevernment. But your parents and grand parents did not help him. They helped british. Until now you also have a mind set that Hitler is tyrant. Feel shame on those who Indians opposed Bose.
This is with due reference to the book “Freedom At Midnight”authored by Dominique Lappier and Larry Collins.The India Independence Agreement signed by PtNehru and counter signed by Lord Mountbatten had a clause which said that “Subash Chandra Bose is declared a war criminal and in the event the Independent Govt of India laid its hands on him,he shall be duly made over to the British Govt.Hence it is natural that the Cong Govt can only display a luke warm attitude towards the whole issue.
One should understand as to why all Govts be they are Congress, BJP, or even Third Front where Left parties from Bengal are prime partners chose to shut those files from public view.
The fact of the matter as PV Narasimha Rao told me once was that the truth about Netaji Bose is not so beautiful as many Indians like to think.
That is why those files are never made public in order to prevent heartburn to many; they chose to leave him in the imaginary pedestal the Indian public wants to keep.
Re: THE TRUTH ABOUT BOSE IS NOT SO BEUTIFUL; THAT IS WHY.........
by V SR on Aug 18, 2012 10:39 PM
PVN told you? What else he told you? BTW: what is you age.. if can ask? If you 70 plus, you may not remember what he said. If you 30 plus, you would have not understood what he said, 15 years before.
Re: THE TRUTH ABOUT BOSE IS NOT SO BEUTIFUL; THAT IS WHY.........
by Parichay on Aug 18, 2012 10:58 PM
Yes the truth is bitter .. for probably for Indian political parties.
Re: THE TRUTH ABOUT BOSE IS NOT SO BEUTIFUL; THAT IS WHY.........
by Sumit on Aug 19, 2012 12:06 PM
That means Congress Govt has doctored many files on Netaji with blatant lies so when they come out in the open people will be confused.But dont worry dear,first hand information is available in archives of various foreign countries which are not in the Anglo-American bloc.
