Discussion Board

2G scam: How Raja indicted PM, Chidambaram


Total 119 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
SHREESHA RANGANATH
What an ingeneous argument!
by SHREESHA RANGANATH on Jul 25, 2011 09:56 PM  | Hide replies

Selling of equity does not amount to selling of licence as per corporate law! It is definitely a sham transaction carried out with the sole intention of selling of licence. People are not fools to take this argument, and much less the judiciary.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
ashish anand
Re: What an ingeneous argument!
by ashish anand on Jul 25, 2011 10:07 PM
By That logic, reliance is selling the oilfields now. And what is wrong in getting investors from outside even if they are coming for spectrum; is not tata making cars in UK and 1/2 of this online population is working in comapnies which are doing work of americans.

And will anybody tell me why one government is bad when it tries to maximize revenue by buying land cheap and selling at high rates to developer and the another one is also bad when it does not go for revenue maximization and instead focuses upon providing cheaper infrastructure to the citizen?

Can we have some uniformity in this country?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
rajaram ram
Re: Re: What an ingeneous argument!
by rajaram ram on Jul 25, 2011 10:16 PM
but in this case the buying companies were explicitly mentioned in the Home ministry entries and feedback from USA that they are front for ISI and China government. Why ignore national security? Other than that selling of equity under normal circumstances would be no problem.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
ashish anand
Re: Re: Re: What an ingeneous argument!
by ashish anand on Jul 26, 2011 12:18 AM
Now that is the argument for etisalat and are we talking about that? we are just talking senselessly about so-called 1,76,000 cr. If companies wld have to pay that, wont they charge it to common man?
Further, even this logic does not apply to telenor?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
arun dass
THUGS AND DACOITS
by arun dass on Jul 25, 2011 09:53 PM

INDIAN PUBLIC ARE STRUGGLING FOR LIVELIHOOD , THESE BASTARDD POLITICIANS ARE LOOTING THE COUNTRY AND DOING STUPID POLITICS .WHOEVER LIKE ANNA HAZARE , BABA RAMDEV RAISING VOICE ARE SUPRESSED BY THESE THUGS .

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Praveen Goud
Capitalism is to generate eligible capitalists
by Praveen Goud on Jul 25, 2011 09:48 PM  | Hide replies

Capitalism is to generate eligible capitalists with capital who can be a rickshaw puller or realty developers. Capitalism is not propreity of Tata nor Ambani brothers. Tata started from cycle tyres, why is he into Telecom now?.Reliance started with Oil , why is he into Telecom now?.

Raja, as we know is JUST a scapegoat in bias of CBI on political vendetta though corruption and commission which he recieved makes him guilty according to law.

When same policy of NO AUCTION to benefit interested parties or corporates who gave donations to political party, TATA and Reliance too are accountable along with NDA government and UPA government.

A minister with prior declared assets before swearing as minister and the assets he is declaring within couple of years of minister is eligbile for RULE OF LAW on corrupted ministers.

The only beauty of Capitalism is, a rickshaw puller too can become a Capitalist which is not possible in either Socialism nor Communism.

CBI should loop in all from prior governments including NDA. If CBI is constrained or biased, better have parallel CBI investigation teams to bring in other parties biased by current CBI team.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
junei
Re: Capitalism is to generate eligible capitalists
by junei on Jul 25, 2011 10:29 PM
Don't forget real mega beneficiary's name a gentleman from Pakistan, and a protected guest of ISI in Karachi is hidden behind others.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
YK SRINATH
Manmohan should resign
by YK SRINATH on Jul 25, 2011 09:41 PM  | Hide replies

If PM is a gentleman, he should resign and expose the culprits in 2G scam.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
devedas bhaskar
Re: Manmohan should resign
by devedas bhaskar on Jul 25, 2011 10:10 PM
he is not..didnt u know by now?!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
junei
Re: Manmohan should resign
by junei on Jul 25, 2011 10:31 PM
He should have corrupt UPA 2 members arrested that Includes, Soniaji, Rahulji,Robert Vadhraji, Priyankaji, Chidambarmji, Ahmad Patel Kurseedji and bring in New cabinet

   Forward   |   Report abuse
homeless fire
Raja names PM
by homeless fire on Jul 25, 2011 09:40 PM

our great PM 'Money' mohan Sing is suffering from diarrhoea right now! so he cant say anything..he will ask a cabinet meeting to put a centre fresh chewing gum on Raja;s mouth.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Satyam Reporter
PM shud resign.
by Satyam Reporter on Jul 25, 2011 09:29 PM  | Hide replies

If he is a gentleman, Manmohan shud resign immediately and appear before the court.



    Forward  |  Report abuse
arun dass
Re: PM shud resign.
by arun dass on Jul 25, 2011 09:46 PM
HE IS A GENTLEMAN OR CORRUPTER ???

   Forward   |   Report abuse
freewill
///
by freewill on Jul 25, 2011 09:29 PM  | Hide replies

Raja playing games with mms and chidu.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Satyam Reporter
Re: ///
by Satyam Reporter on Jul 25, 2011 09:30 PM
Why should Raja play game. He is a scapegoat for the sins done by Sonia and manmohan.
PM knows what RAJA was doing.
PM knows how Spectrum was allocated.
But PM is acting as if he is innocent.
A Person working under RAJA can act innocent,
But a PM shiuldnt act as innocent.
Does PM thinks that TELECOM MINISTRY controls the country or he the PM, controls the country?

As the leader of the government why he didnt
stop this allocation?.

Say PM doesnt know what Raja was doing and he was mislead.
But in such case, When the first company gets it allocation he shud have acted and reverted all the allocation immediately.Right?
Why PM didnt force AUCTION?

But sadly opposition, media, court has to step-in. And still now the leader of the government is hiding behind sonia. What a shame to india?

If it was other country, Certainly Prime Minister will be in jail now.

Can the law of india act quickly and arrest Manmohan Singh, Chidambram.

If Manmoha singh says that he is the proxy of sonia, then arrest Sonia too.

Guys, whats your call on this?


   Forward   |   Report abuse
freewill
Re: Re: ///
by freewill on Jul 25, 2011 09:32 PM
everyone knows PM is involved in this.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Satyam Reporter
PM is the NO-1 Culprit in 2G scam
by Satyam Reporter on Jul 25, 2011 09:28 PM  | Hide replies

PM knows what RAJA was doing.
PM knows how Spectrum was allocated.
But PM is acting as if he is innocent.
A Person working under RAJA can act innocent,
But a PM shiuldnt act as innocent.
Does PM thinks that TELECOM MINISTRY controls the country or he the PM, controls the country?

As the leader of the government why he didnt
stop this allocation?.

Say PM doesnt know what Raja was doing and he was mislead.
But in such case, When the first company gets it allocation he shud have acted and reverted all the allocation immediately.Right?
Why PM didnt force AUCTION?

But sadly opposition, media, court has to step-in. And still now the leader of the government is hiding behind sonia. What a shame to india?

If it was other country, Certainly Prime Minister will be in jail now.

Can the law of india act quickly and arrest Manmohan Singh, Chidambram.

If Manmoha singh says that he is the proxy of sonia, then arrest Sonia too.

Guys, whats your call on this?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
arun dass
Re: PM is the NO-1 Culprit in 2G scam
by arun dass on Jul 25, 2011 09:49 PM
CORRUPTED POLITICIANS DO LIKE THIS ONLY ...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
rajaram ram
he can be rewarded
by rajaram ram on Jul 25, 2011 09:26 PM

by lessening the punishment if he exposes everybody in the corruption including 10 janpath

    Forward  |  Report abuse
sundara reddy
raja statement on Pm
by sundara reddy on Jul 25, 2011 09:26 PM

manmohan is raja of corruption, throw him behind bars and save the country

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 119 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message