Re: Why NDA did't solved Bofors scandel in there 6 year rule.And
by Akansha on Jan 11, 2011 09:20 PM
NDA was busy ruling the country and for the people. They are not going in front of media cam and accusing the opposition always, like what congis are doing now. They left the law to take its own course, and now the truth is coming out.
Re: Re: Why NDA did't solved Bofors scandel in there 6 year rule
by Krishna Govindan on Jan 11, 2011 09:27 PM
Yes. They were so busy ruling the country that did nothing to investigate the Bofors issue; intruders from Pakistan were allowed into Kargil; escorted terrorists to Kandahar in a special plane in which Jaswant Singh also travelled; were busy in making people like Rahul Mahajan rich without any sort of corruption and did not go before the media as the present day NDA leaders are doing. Perhaps there are people who may believe such comments as yours!!
Re: Re: Re: Why NDA did't solved Bofors scandel in there 6 year
by Niranjan Subramani on Jan 11, 2011 10:57 PM
we can only say Krishnaaaa..Govinda...thats all. The deciscion of Khandhar was made in a all party meeting which also included Congress. Now Congress forgot that also Burkha Dutt, Vir Sanghvi etc have helped in forgetting many of the deeds of Congress.
Re: Re: Re: Why NDA did't solved Bofors scandel in there 6 year
by Akansha on Jan 11, 2011 09:30 PM
you are right, that they helped to secure 200 passangers free. Not like the drama done by mufti, once the CM of J and K , he organised to get release few terrorists, to get relased his kidnapped daughter. All drama. Had if kargil incident happened in congrss rule, then congress wuld have exchanged the kashmir with them. so cheers
Pakistan resulting in the disintegration of the Pakistani economy and by consequence the disintegration of many areas of the state into lawless areas despite the size of the Pakistani Army, this would result in fallout across the whole region and the wider world on a scale of several magnitudes greater than that which followed the collapse of Iraq following the 2003 invasion.
Re: Why all Nahru Gandhi Bashers are Jinnah praiser. When Gadkari
by Shri Hegde on Jan 11, 2011 09:32 PM
because thanks to Jinnah we don't have to deal with half a billion population of vote bank politics.
They have two issue's perpectually pasted on this face and chest;
1. Sonia Gandhi and her "foriegn nationality"
2. Quoterachhi and "Bofors-pay-off"
off-course now the added issue is
2G Scam;but they are not very sure of it as it will bring alive Mr.Promod Mahajan as Communication Minister;which BJP and RSS will never want back in its erased memory.
So good for Mr.Gadkari to tell SanghParivar people; look BJP was dead under LK Advani; and now I have put back it into Oxygen!
In effect;both Sushma and Arun Jaitely are useless for BJP.
Re: Re: GADKARI HAS MADE BJP MORE AND MORE CONFUSEDLY ACTIVE!
by JGN on Jan 11, 2011 09:17 PM
What is the use of RahUllu for Kangress? 4/243 in Bihar???
Re: GADKARI HAS MADE BJP MORE AND MORE CONFUSEDLY ACTIVE!
by babu on Jan 11, 2011 09:17 PM
Why NDA did't solved Bofors scandel in there 6 year rule.And all Scandles done by congress.Because NDA was busy in there own scandles.
Re: Re: GADKARI HAS MADE BJP MORE AND MORE CONFUSEDLY ACTIVE!
by Alpha on Jan 11, 2011 09:22 PM
really??? who looted 2 lakh crores in a 2010 in scandals??
Re: Re: Re: GADKARI HAS MADE BJP MORE AND MORE CONFUSEDLY ACTIVE!
by JGN on Jan 11, 2011 09:23 PM
That is the birth right of Kangress. How dare you question that?
Re: GADKARI HAS MADE BJP MORE AND MORE CONFUSEDLY ACTIVE!
by andrew lachman on Jan 11, 2011 09:58 PM
you must be a joker on the evil side Sudhakar........
Re: GADKARI HAS MADE BJP MORE AND MORE CONFUSEDLY ACTIVE!
by Abe Oye on Jan 11, 2011 09:17 PM
Pramod Mahajan enriched himself and BJP a lot. Today Mahajan family can live happily everafter without working because of the money he earnt. When he didn't share that money with his brother Praveen, he got bumped off...
christians have started to raise against the govt of pakistan, the minorities. How far they could go? is pak a democratic country? if so, would that punjab governor be killed?
