Thanks to Rediff for publishing the article. This will be real eyeopener for Telanagana Supporters. It clearly reveals what Mozlims from Telangana think about themselves & as well as their plans if Telangana forms.
Let us go back to History. Telangana was ruled by Himdus & Mozlems. There were very less religious problems before Nizam. But when Nizam (Usman Mir Ali) took charge, he pressed Himdus like anything. He was Aurangzeb of South. He was one of the richest person of the world of his time. But he became rich by looting people from his state. He himself used to live a simple life & not fond of using money for luxory.
Himdus fought for independence & Hyderabad became part of India after 1 year of Indian Independence. Himdus & Mozlems also, were looted by Nizam & Razakars.
Problem is that due to Nizam Regime, the Mozlems still think that they are superior & are here to rule. They want to do it again.
If telangana state is required so badly, then there is a seventh option. Name the united state of Andhra Pradesh as " Telangana " and other regions sacrifice their region names " Rayala Seema " and "Coastal Andhra". Telangana people will be happy just because whole state is Telangana in this case.
Re: Re: Re: State is No body's property
by satish naidu on Jan 10, 2011 04:56 PM
why you compete DMK Tamilnadu, coastal andhra is real hindu telugu nadu
My Dear Brothers & Systers of Seema & Andhra, After reading The Srikrishna Committee Report, It is very clearly evident that you people have NOT LOOTED US. Actually it is vice-versa. We will never forget your contribution for the phenomenal growth of the Twin Cities of Hyderabad & Secunderabad DIRECTLY and various parts of other Telangana Region INDIRECTLY. I whole-heartedly convey our apologies to you for various uncalled-for remarks made by our Telangana leaders since long. Srikrishna Committee Report has opened our Eyes. We are very sorry to you. Even though our leaders irritated you, most of you were very calm just like a Pot full of Knowledge, Patience and forgivingness. I request you to continue your services for the development of our beloved State Capital ”HYDERABAD”. We Hyderabadis support you and you please extend your support to us. HYDERABAD IS OUR COMMON PROPERTY EVEN IF IT IS A UNION TERRITORY. We salute you
Re: Why MIM is opposing Telengana ?
by Muqeem on Jan 10, 2011 04:30 PM
Nope.A seperate telangana would strengthen BJP and MIM does not want it to happen.
Re: Re: Why MIM is opposing Telengana ?
by dinesh pandian on Jan 10, 2011 04:34 PM
what if 2nd SRC comes and carves Telengana?. bjp threatening to take telengana into its kitty, and there is no effective way to parry the threat
Re: Re: Re: Why MIM is opposing Telengana ?
by satish naidu on Jan 10, 2011 04:42 PM
your point is correct, that is the intention of hyderabad mslims and telangana muslims
It is very clear now that majority of the people living in Telanagana region want to form a seperate state now. Now what needs to be known is whether the PEOPLE OF HYDERABAD REALLY WANT TO BE WITH TELANGANA OR WOULD LIKE HYDERABAD TO BE A SEPERATE UNION TERRITORY. Let the Govt allow a REFERENDUM for Hyderabad people to vote on this account and take a decision. This will end this issue once for all with either Telangana with Hyd as capital OR Telanagana state and Hyd as seperate union territory. If Telanagana has a right to decide that they will be a seperate state, then even HYDERABAD has a right to decide if they need to seperate. Afterall, HYD consists of people from various regions, not only Telanagana. Once HYD people to be a seperate union territory, who are Telangana people to stop them (the same logic Telanagana people are applying to get seperated from AP).
Now the real face of telugana comes open in andhra. I always belived that it is the muslims and nizams of Hyderabad whats telugana and they divided the Andra people and tried to achive it. Now the committe has cleared told that for security reason, it should be united, they now come open and ask for muslim state in india. why Osmania University is very much concern in this telungana separation. all muslims professors in university try to use this for there muslim state. Andhra people don't accept it and you will be thrown out of state by this muslim who will support talipans and muslim laws. I am not against muslim but those guys who fight for separate state is hardcore supporters of muslim in talibans
Re: Telugana is a real muslim fight in the name of Telugu people
by Bhajiya on Jan 10, 2011 04:25 PM
Why you feel Muslims are not indian? Muslims if they are majority in Telangana and since 100o years accept it. Nizam was ruler of Telangana who deny this fact accept it.
But your hard core hindu is not ready accept muslim as indian.
This is problem. Let Telangana emerge as new State with Muslim majority why you are crying its their destiny.
Re: Re: Telugana is a real muslim fight in the name of Telugu peo
by manoj on Jan 10, 2011 04:28 PM
hindu majority states should be declared as hindu states
Re: Telugana is a real muslim fight in the name of Telugu people
by chetan Shetty on Jan 10, 2011 04:24 PM
Now Telugana and later speperate state like kashmir issue....they will never live in peace.Do not split andra, its good as it is.Also GOVT of india has to pass a resolution/bill that no more division shall be done to any states as existing.
Re: Telugana is a real muslim fight in the name of Telugu people
by manoj on Jan 10, 2011 04:24 PM
oh come on, the mulsim party MIM of hyderabad is opposing Telengana. Why ?
Re: SKC Report
by Surender Reddy on Jan 10, 2011 04:33 PM
The first option recommends that nothing needs to be done. The sixth option recommends that it should be shown/percieved that something is being done.
In reality, of course, there is no difference. Your point is quite valid. The report does not serve any useful purpose.
Re: SKC Report
by soumya sreelaxmi on Jan 10, 2011 02:07 PM
1st option Means state as it is. And 6 th option suggest that united state with development forums for all three regions.
Re: Re: SKC Report
by joby kalichira on Jan 10, 2011 04:31 PM
Best solution is option 7.form a new state with telugana vidharbha and make capital as nagpur.Give hydrabad to AP.
Re: SKC Report
by Surender Reddy on Jan 10, 2011 04:33 PM
The first option recommends that nothing needs to be done. The sixth option recommends that it should be shown/percieved that something is being done.
In reality, of course, there is no difference. Your point is quite valid. The report does not serve any useful purpose.
