Re: Re: Re: Expressways
by SURESH BABU on Jan 10, 2011 03:34 PM
Mr.TP, You are somewhere giving room people to speak. You cannot achieve anything if you think you can influence by physically assult. Go to Osmania perhaps CRPF may let you know what sound thrashing is.
Re: Expressways
by ram on Jan 09, 2011 01:14 PM
We should have highways connecting Tirupati chennai and bangalore but not Tirupati as capital. For Andhraites the no.1 enemies or Tamilians not Telanganites. The tamilian chidambaram is responsible for this mess. If he is not there no one would have dared to give such assurances.
Re: Re: Expressways
by gopalakrishna on Jan 09, 2011 01:17 PM
Sir, don't be regressive in your thinking. ESL Narasimhan, who is the governor is a Tamilian, and he is against Telangana. No body is our enemy. And for God's sake, Tirupati is in Andhra Pradesh and is surrounded by Telugu-speaking people.
Re: Re: Re: Expressways
by ram on Jan 09, 2011 01:21 PM
Surrounded by telugu speaking people. You just visit places like chittoor then you understanding things better... I know that are many good people in p0rki9tan also like you gave an example of one good fellow Narasimhan..
Re: Re: Re: Re: Expressways
by gopalakrishna on Jan 09, 2011 01:26 PM
Visit Chittoor district? I stayed there. Be more broadminded. And there are many Telugu people in Chennai and Bangalore too. But of course, you are from ISI right, so you want to divide India into millions of pieces.
Andhra people who are in hyderabad or any where in telangana should remain here after separation. Who are you to say them to go from Hyderabad. They should stay here and help in developing telangana state
Re: Re: Retoric should stop
by Raghu on Jan 09, 2011 01:07 PM
I may live till my grand grand grand son is born but i wish you would live till then to witness telangana state progress and see you were wrong in 2011
Re: Re: Retoric should stop
by gopalakrishna on Jan 09, 2011 01:02 PM
I am against separate Telangana too, but I never insult the people from that region. Rayudu, you must be an ISI agent.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Retoric should stop
by gopalakrishna on Jan 09, 2011 01:07 PM
Only you must know. What instructions did the ISI give you? To insult other Indians and deepen the already existing divisions?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Retoric should stop
by Rayudu on Jan 09, 2011 01:16 PM
First Teach UR TRS Naxals, first, who are born for spreading VENOM against A
Re: Advantages of peddapuram as Andhra capital
by Raghu on Jan 09, 2011 01:01 PM
Kalyan ram - you are not helping the cause. You cannot claim everything is milk in telangana. We have many faults too. Stop this hatred. Telangana cannot be achieved by hatred.
Re: Advantages of peddapuram as Andhra capital
by ram on Jan 09, 2011 01:26 PM
@kalyan ram We are proud of peddapuram. The beggers like Telanganites do not deserve thai message. Telangana pandulaki, dunnapotulaku em telusu ponds powder vasana.
Re: Advantages of peddapuram as Andhra capital
by telangana pourudu on Jan 09, 2011 01:06 PM
Dear Kalyan, let us not spread hatred, please......................
Re: Re: time up
by telangana pourudu on Jan 09, 2011 12:55 PM
Rayudu, give your address and see who will be kicked first. Stop provocating, otherwise...........................
Re: time up
by Raghu on Jan 09, 2011 12:55 PM
People like you are causing the problem. After all you cannot challenge indian fundamental right to settle anywhare to prosper. We are not against andhra people. We are against charectes like lagadapati, kovvuri samba siva rao etc
Re: time up
by telangana pourudu on Jan 09, 2011 12:54 PM
Dear Kalyan Ram, our aim is not to target people from coastal andhra. we should fight against land grabbers whose companies not looted T region but also Insurance companies, our govt etc., Got it? Innocent people shd not be dragged into this issue, they are also indians. NOt target is land grabbers.
Re: time up
by Raghu on Jan 09, 2011 12:54 PM
stop it. I am a telangana guy and i do not appreciate this kind of rhetoric. Andhra people who are in telangana state should remain here and work for telangana progress after separation
If new state Seemandhra is formed, it is better to make Tirupati as capital and build two express ways. One from Tirupati to Chennai and another from Tirupati to Bangalore. Chennai and Bangalore are the most developed cities in India. Companies from these places will easily set up some of their operations in Tirupati, if you have good expressways.
Re: Re: Expressways to Chennai and Bangalore
by gopalakrishna on Jan 09, 2011 12:52 PM
You are very selfish. You want to visit the place for God's darshan, but you do not want the city to develop economically?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Expressways to Chennai and Bangalore
by gopalakrishna on Jan 09, 2011 01:00 PM
And Mr. Rayudu, you develop your Karachi and Islamabad first.
Re: Expressways to Chennai and Bangalore
by ram on Jan 09, 2011 12:53 PM
That will be the 2nd most wors decision in the history of Andhra Pradesh. First one was making Hyderabad as capital. Tirupati is mostly tamil cultured..its better to merge seema with Tamilnadu and to have chennai as capital instead of Tirupati.
Re: Re: Expressways to Chennai and Bangalore
by Rayudu on Jan 09, 2011 12:56 PM
And North te LANGA na with chattisgarh, because their culture and face cuts resemble them
Re: worst politics
by telangana pourudu on Jan 09, 2011 12:49 PM
SKC report could not provide any help to Chidu or Sonia as they were expecting some more time. In any case, T is inevitable. SAMPOORNA SWARAJYAM LIKE MOVEMENT = TELANGANA with HYDERABAD.
Why shd there be any apprehensions that smaller states do not develop / nor are stable? BTW, demand for T is stemming from the discretion shown by coastal people towards T people. T people were always humiliated, and chosen for "B" grade jobs. They always preferred coastal people even when equals were available from T. Even in remotest of T regions, you find coastal people and in major towns of coastal AP you do not find T people. Can anyone now say that there was no disparity?
Re: Re: example Haryana, Utharkhand, Punjab
by telangana pourudu on Jan 09, 2011 12:51 PM
they developed more after divide, btw i like the way you asked.
Re: Re: Re: Re: example Haryana, Utharkhand, Punjab
by Free Suggestion on Jan 09, 2011 01:00 PM
You are a worker who came to Hyderabad for work. You worked and got paid. Hyderabad cannot be developed more with same old workers. We need workers called migrants with new skills and experience.
Hyderabad will be developed more if we get rid of people like you from Hyderabad.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: example Haryana, Utharkhand, Punjab
by Rayudu on Jan 09, 2011 01:11 PM
and u r worker , working as a chaprasi in some andhra company or A mess in HYD and gets paid.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: example Haryana, Utharkhand, Punjab
by SURESH BABU on Jan 10, 2011 03:52 PM
Are you from O.U., perhaps Kodanda might have taught you this junk. Please empty it and put something in your mind with good ideas, this is my free suggestion. Have a brain of your own, not of TRS.
Re: Re: Re: Re: example Haryana, Utharkhand, Punjab
by telangana pourudu on Jan 09, 2011 01:08 PM
T's demand is not for development. it is for the discrimination shown towards it
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: example Haryana, Utharkhand, Punjab
by SURESH BABU on Jan 10, 2011 03:57 PM
Certainly it was political discrimination but remember when there was a choice of Sonia, again she took Seema person, remember leadership qualities are more important at helm of affairs and whoever possess them, opportunities comes to their door steps ex. PVNR as PM. Why you worry about political problems your leaders are facing?, why not you ask for your problems like development? They do not have concern for you and give lame excuses that Seemandhra leaders prevents them from doing so. Question T-leaders fight for the miseries of people.
Re: Re: Re: example Haryana, Utharkhand, Punjab
by idea on Jan 09, 2011 01:03 PM
show me a bacward state,developed after bifurcation pakistan divide from india on the name of self-respect,what happened after that?bangla developed? developing?separating? now it is NWf
Re: example Haryana, Utharkhand, Punjab
by ram on Jan 09, 2011 12:55 PM
In smaller states, big business houses cant survive and they cannot expand their business. And also smaller states will not have any bargaining power in a federal republic like India.
Re: Re: example Haryana, Utharkhand, Punjab
by Free Suggestion on Jan 09, 2011 01:02 PM
Singapore country, Belgium countries are smaller than Hyderabad itself. They are half the size of Hyderabad.
Re: Re: Re: example Haryana, Utharkhand, Punjab
by idea on Jan 09, 2011 01:07 PM
singapore,cyprus developed states were divided not developed after divide I am asking about jarkhand,chattisgarh,tokkalochal how many indians know they too states? what are their capitals? what their identity?
Re: Re: Re: example Haryana, Utharkhand, Punjab
by SURESH BABU on Jan 10, 2011 04:12 PM
Singapore and Belgium are port cities engaging in entreport business and prospored, where is the scope for Hyderabad to get that port, perhaps KCR may promise he can do it and you believe, it is a good FREE-SUGGESTION, follow KCR blindly. Any how you Telangana want to prosper entirely on Hyderabad or have any contingent plans to be self-sufficient on other areas also.
what is avg govt tenure in jarkhand? only one year goa? one year how cam you say smaller states are safe? smaller states for decentralization? no it could be centralization of uncertainty
Re: @raghu
by Raghu on Jan 09, 2011 12:43 PM
States like bihar are improving and voting for development and not based on caste. Its a huge development in itself. It happened because it got separated from jharkhand which removed the motive for cast or any other motivation. And GDP has improved in all the small states after separation
Re: Re: Re: @raghu
by Free Suggestion on Jan 09, 2011 01:04 PM
Kondapalli, Azad and Most of Naxalites are from srikakulam and andhra. Not from telangana.
If a new state of Seemandhra is formed, I feel that Tirupati should be capital. This has many advantages. It helps in development of Rayalaseema, which has been identified as the most backward region by SriKrishna commission. Tirupati's proximity to highly developed cities like Chennai (150 km) and Bangalore (250 km) would be a feather in its cap. We can easily attract investments from Chennai and Bangalore based companies. Further, Tirupati is revered throughout India as it is the abode of Sri Venkateswara swamy. People visit the place from all over India.
Re: Advantages of Tirupati as capital
by Raghu on Jan 09, 2011 12:40 PM
For your own good leave capital to andhra. History will repeat again and you will have to loose tirupati and left with nothing in next 20 years
Re: Re: Advantages of Tirupati as capital
by gopalakrishna on Jan 09, 2011 12:45 PM
Not a problem. It doesn't mean that other cities will be neglected. Vijayawada and Visakhapatnam can develop too.
Re: Re: Re: Advantages of Tirupati as capital
by gopalakrishna on Jan 09, 2011 12:50 PM
What is problem with the sanctity? Temple is on a hill, it's sanctity will not be disturbed if Tirupati is made capital.
Re: Advantages of Tirupati as capital
by gopalakrishna on Jan 09, 2011 12:43 PM
We also need two expressways. One from Tirupati to Chennai and another from Tirupati to Bangalore. Chennai and Bangalore are the most developed cities in India. Companies from these places will easily set up some of their operations in Tirupati, if you have good expressways.
Re: Advantages of Tirupati as capital
by gopalakrishna on Jan 09, 2011 12:34 PM
Because Tirupati is a very revered place, all Telugu people will feel at home in this town. Thus, I feel Tirupati is best suited to be capital.
Re: Re: Advantages of Tirupati as capital
by Free Suggestion on Jan 09, 2011 12:38 PM
First Preference - Visakapatnam Second Preference - Vijaywada Third Preference - Kurnool Fourth Preference - Tirupati
Re: Re: Re: Advantages of Tirupati as capital
by gopalakrishna on Jan 09, 2011 12:40 PM
Visakhapatnam - good place but very far from nost of Seemandhra.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Advantages of Tirupati as capital
by ram on Jan 09, 2011 12:58 PM
Let us not chose Tirupati as capital brother. Its already tamil cultured.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Advantages of Tirupati as capital
by Free Suggestion on Jan 09, 2011 12:51 PM
Better make the above or develop on in Nellore or Prakasam district which will be nearby to Chennai for business interests.Tirupati does not belong to Telugus. It belongs to Tamils. Once tamilians get awareness, tirupati will be claimed by tamilians.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Advantages of Tirupati as capital
by Rayudu on Jan 09, 2011 01:03 PM
another T Naxal , by name Free suggestion joins Gopala's bandwagon
Andhra Pradesh is one State for who speaks telugu... If any one asking for seperation that is for their political gain... KCR - Want to become CM, if AP is united he can't get that seat in his next 7 Life's.... Babu - despirately waiting for the power, If AP is Splitted he can't get that... Congress - Playing with people emotions.... PEOPLE WHO ARE THINKING FOR SEPERATION AND UNITED ARE NOT THINKING ABOUT INDIA.....SIMPLY THEY WANT TO MAKE MONEY FROM THIS POLITICAL MILEAGE FOR THEIR CHILDS FOR THE NEXT 100YRS... WE ARE INDIANS AND ACT LIKE INDIANS....
