Kerala's youngest candidate fights his first election

Re: MiyaKaTankUoooper!!!!! by giveanid on Apr 12, 2011 11:17 AM Malaysia is not 100% Mulsim country. Turkey is not 100% Muslim country. Everytime they ask for an example, and gets one, these people comes up with these stupid lines! Who cares 100% or not? They are Muslim majority nation, and according to you guys, they can't have secularism or non Muslim representation etc! Now eat that!    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: MiyaKaTankUoooper!!!!! by JGN on Apr 12, 2011 11:21 AM mamu, then why you guys are fighting over the use of the wordAllah??    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: MiyaKaTankUoooper!!!!! by giveanid on Apr 12, 2011 11:27 AM I did not. Did you? I only guess it is like fighting over breast cloth in Kerala.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Re: MiyaKaTankUoooper!!!!! by JGN on Apr 12, 2011 11:36 AM hahahahhahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhaa!!!!!    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: MiyaKaTankUoooper!!!!! by The Patriot on Apr 12, 2011 11:19 AM talk about the laws in the consitution!!!! why is "secular" turkey mandating the eslamic headscarf law on even non-muslims????    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: MiyaKaTankUoooper!!!!! by giveanid on Apr 12, 2011 11:25 AM If I was Turkish, I would oppose it.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Re: MiyaKaTankUoooper!!!!! by The Patriot on Apr 12, 2011 11:27 AM then, STFU and learn more abt secularism and not sickularism!!!!!    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: MiyaKaTankUoooper!!!!! by giveanid on Apr 12, 2011 11:32 AM hahahah. man, I am not Turkish! Why are you angry that I am not French or Turkish? Forward   |   Report abuse

Re: y by JGN on Apr 12, 2011 11:16 AM Pakis will not accept IndianMs. The condition of a few thousand who migrated during 1947 itself is really pathetic. Some of them have returned toMalabar to dieInPeace at the place of theirBirth. There have been constant fights between the Ms migrated to Pak during 1947 and the nativeSindhis inKarchi and the same continues even today. There are hardly anyHs in Pak and India will defnitely accept them.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: y by suppandi on Apr 12, 2011 11:18 AM Thanks JGN for the prompt answer. This shows even Paki M's think Indian M's are unfaithful and impure    Forward   |   Report abuse

Re: @giveanid by giveanid on Apr 12, 2011 11:18 AM But you said Bush said it is xtian country. Now you say it is not. C'mon JGN, make up your mind, arrive at a point and then post!    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: @giveanid by JGN on Apr 12, 2011 11:22 AM Seems you are on drugs; GeorgeWBush was talking about theAtheists and notHindus!!! ReadMyMessage again.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: @giveanid by giveanid on Apr 12, 2011 11:33 AM So, Bush has problem with atheists, but not with Hindus? And you said only one God in US. And asked me to guess. I get it right now. It was RAM! Poor JGN. Always like this. Have no idea what he is talking!    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: @giveanid by The Patriot on Apr 12, 2011 11:23 AM by bush saying US is an xtian country, US doesnt become one.....the constitution needs to say that!!!!!!    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: @giveanid by giveanid on Apr 12, 2011 11:33 AM Tell that to JGN please. He is worried.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: @giveanid by josestv@rediffmail.com on Apr 13, 2011 05:25 AM The dead Jew On stick prayd when he was on cross for d people who put him on cross...u must be either uneducated or ur education did not helpd to improve ur charecter...u r full of hatred to other people becoz they r xians or muslims....i dont think gud people in any relegion will hate other people on basis of their relegion...may god bless u    Forward   |   Report abuse

Re: Mr.Gandhi's vision and passion by giveanid on Apr 12, 2011 11:03 AM How about the rest of 29 candidates chosen by him , most of which are Hindus?    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Mr.Gandhi's vision and passion by The Patriot on Apr 12, 2011 11:05 AM u cant expect 100% representation of non-hindus in a 80% hindu majority nation!!!!! non-muslims in eslamic shitholes have 0% percent representation irrespective of their population percentage!!!!!    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Mr.Gandhi's vision and passion by giveanid on Apr 12, 2011 11:09 AM So, you expect 100% Hindu selection in 80% Hindu nation? In Malaysia, there are non Muslims in parliament.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Re: Mr.Gandhi's vision and passion by JGN on Apr 12, 2011 11:12 AM >>>>>In Malaysia, there are non Muslims in parliament>>>>MullahLogic!!!! Malaysia is not 100%MuslimCountry. Still they fight over evenDeadBodies and even over use of the worldAllah. SomeChurches were attacked a few months back over theChristians using the wordAllah despite theirCourts allowing the same.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Re: Mr.Gandhi's vision and passion by The Patriot on Apr 12, 2011 11:10 AM thats cos malaysia has only 60% muslims and they are not an eslamic nation!!!!!!    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Mr.Gandhi's vision and passion by giveanid on Apr 12, 2011 11:20 AM So 60% is not Muslim majority? It is a secular country like Muslim majority Turkey. So you have 2 nations now! So what do you mean by a Islamic nation? Forward   |   Report abuse

Re: Secularism v/s CompetitiveCommunalism by giveanid on Apr 12, 2011 11:09 AM Secularism is not denial of religion.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Secularism v/s CompetitiveCommunalism by The Patriot on Apr 12, 2011 11:11 AM secularism is not an amoeba whose definition u can change however u want!!!!!!    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Secularism v/s CompetitiveCommunalism by JGN on Apr 12, 2011 11:13 AM It is not promotion of religion also!!!!    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Secularism v/s CompetitiveCommunalism by giveanid on Apr 12, 2011 11:20 AM Equal treatment, that is it.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Re: Secularism v/s CompetitiveCommunalism by JGN on Apr 12, 2011 11:29 AM No; State should not interfere inRelgiousAffairs.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Secularism v/s CompetitiveCommunalism by giveanid on Apr 12, 2011 11:35 AM Yes, should not. But that does not mean that state shouldn't support religious activities of followers. Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Secularism v/s CompetitiveCommunalism by The Patriot on Apr 12, 2011 11:02 AM exactly......these pseudo-gandhis are fooling everyone that secularism and "freedom of religion" is one and the same!!!!    Forward   |   Report abuse

Re: @giveanid - hindu nepal!!!!! by giveanid on Apr 12, 2011 11:05 AM hahahahaha, yes, I wonder why those Nepali Hindus don't like Manu Smrithi! You should tell them Manu Smrithi is the constitution made for Hindus!    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: @giveanid - hindu nepal!!!!! by The Patriot on Apr 12, 2011 11:07 AM big time waffler, stop gargling a truckload of sh1t from ur mouth!!!!! u r the one who claimed that nepal is a hindu nation (meaning following hindu laws)!!!!    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: @giveanid - hindu nepal!!!!! by giveanid on Apr 12, 2011 11:13 AM Nepal is Hindu nation! You don't know that? It is only now thatn the Hindu kingdom was thrown out of absolute power! btw, Hindu nations should follow Manu Smrithi? wow! Now we have another reason not to be a Hindu nation!    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Re: @giveanid - hindu nepal!!!!! by The Patriot on Apr 12, 2011 11:16 AM circular logic!!!!!! when u claim any nation as a religious nation, it is not based on the percentage of a religious group that stays there but the laws that govern them!!!!!! any nation with just 1% hindus can still be called a hindu nation if it follows the hindu laws!!!! did nepal follow it????    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: @giveanid - hindu nepal!!!!! by JGN on Apr 12, 2011 11:03 AM giveanid seems to be living in some caves ofToraBoraMountains; Nepal is a DemocraticRepublic now and theMaoists are ruling the country. They have kicked out theMonarchy long back. TheHindus do not have any obsession for a country of their own. It is the followers of WestAsianReligions who wants to demarcate their territories like DogsDemarcating theirAreas byPissingAround!!!    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: @giveanid - hindu nepal!!!!! by giveanid on Apr 12, 2011 11:15 AM Yes, true that Maoists kicked out the Hindu kings. Before that, was Manu Smrithi practised there? Was Nepal a developed country before Maosists took over?    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: @giveanid - hindu nepal!!!!! by JGN on Apr 12, 2011 11:18 AM mamu, Nepal is a landlocked place without much resources; there are manyIslamicAndChristianShitHoles even poorer thanNepal. ManuSmriti is was NEVER followed in any part of the world at any point of time. Some scholars believe that it was the concoction of theChristianMissionaries.    Forward   |   Report abuse