Discussion Board View article

Total 246 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10   Older >   >>
rahul raj
PAK tells UN
by rahul raj on Sep 30, 2010 11:26 AM  | Hide replies

First and foremost,India must have a face to show to UN and a Voice to assertain at UN. if we have External Affair Ministers above 70 years of age, they fumble,intellect is at its place, but must have some aggression while addressing to UN in the Face and Voice.when that will happen in India !!!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
om shanti
Re: PAK tells UN
by om shanti on Sep 30, 2010 11:28 AM

you mean Arun Jaitley?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
JAKE
Re: Re: PAK tells UN
by JAKE on Sep 30, 2010 11:29 AM
Morning, mate. hope all fine.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
om shanti
Re: Re: Re: PAK tells UN
by om shanti on Sep 30, 2010 12:02 PM
Fine dear..you add me in your page,then we can track each other :)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sachin Purohit
Re: PAK tells UN
by Sachin Purohit on Sep 30, 2010 11:33 AM
At least he spoke this time. That itself should be welcomed. His short-comings can be greatly compensated by unanimously standing right behind his assertiveness. So in every forums including these message-boards, lets show solidarity rather than picking on the voice of the minister.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
sprout
Largest liberal democracy in history.
by sprout on Sep 30, 2010 11:26 AM

Guess the garbage called government of pakistan must first take a very hard look at itself. Somalia and Guatamala is getting better.

These idiots fail to realize that in Pakistan , there is no government. Its Taliban and Al Quida and the military led by kayani who is a chela of the erstwhile musharraf who could not spell 'peace' ( He would say Peeesh).

These fking morons must go back and clean their backyards first before poking snoots in other countries.

Pakistan as a country is left to dogs as of today.

No law and order, no employment, no infra structure and nothing and this fking idiot dares to take India's name - the largest liberal democracy in the world.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
MANNEY
India's reply should have been
by MANNEY on Sep 30, 2010 11:26 AM

We are not going to give you any more land in kashmir, so your bankrupt country can do a land sale and sell to the Chinese, return the Chinese occupied Kashmir first, how come a permanent member of UN council occupying parts of Kashmir ? You will just use the kashmir land sale proceeds -to raise more money for your Jihadi's and military generals, and create more disasters for the Whole world. Whole of Kashmir belongs only to India

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Habibulla
Let them bark
by Habibulla on Sep 30, 2010 11:26 AM  | Hide replies

We are what we are- we don't need a certificate from a fixer nation. Shameless Ejaz apologised. J&K will always be part of Indian nation, you like it or not. Provoking the innocent ones to pelt stones won't help. Look at the results of stone throwing in Palestine.
Think of the Budhists in Ladakh and Pandits in Kashmir. They are not getting provoked.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
JAKE
Re: Let them bark
by JAKE on Sep 30, 2010 11:30 AM
Barking is the only work they can indulge in

   Forward   |   Report abuse
girish naithilingan
What a joke!!
by girish naithilingan on Sep 30, 2010 11:25 AM

Off late, It has always been a joke. The whole world knows Pakistan has zero credibility. They have no values and lack of any support (but for USA) from the west. Their attack on India for J&K is known to the world that they lost Kashmir to India during the partition. Now even after 60 years "pakis" are trying hook and crook to disintegrate Kashmir from India. I feel the country is in deep shambles. Poor economy, zero democracy, loaded with hypocrats and god only knows what all social problems they face. Its so said to say that onces a part of India, today not even considered as a part of society. Thats the Identity of Pakistan.

As some one said, only DOGS can barck but the elephant will walk with respect.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Harkesh
LEGAL DOCUMENTS
by Harkesh on Sep 30, 2010 11:24 AM

India have all legal documents to prove that Jammu & Kashmir is an Integeral part of India. What legal document Pakistan haver ??? Pakistan attacked Kashmir in 1947 and occupied illegally a part of kashmir. Whereas India took charge of kashmir when Raja Hari Singh legally signed to be with India. Its open to everybody that Pakistan used force to occupy kashmir whereas India used diplomatic and democratic way. Plenty of Legal Documents proves it. Pakisdtan should shut up his mouth or have to bear its consequences. India's silence should not be taken its weakness. We Indians believe in live and let others live but if anyone tries to stab us on our back we cannot spare them. Remember whole world. Jai Hind

    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Krishnan
Our weakness
by Krishnan on Sep 30, 2010 11:24 AM

India should stop worrying about Pakistan and think about China and our growth. For this we should have leaders who have long vision and are patriotic. Unfortunately our present ruling leaders are worried about power and self centred. A day will come when we are pushed to the wall and these corrupt leaders will vanish into thin air.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Ravi
Pakistan
by Ravi on Sep 30, 2010 11:24 AM

Till Pakistan is on this earth, India might struggle to get permanet seat in UN. Pakistan existence is anti India and it will remain as it is due to their faith is all of hate.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
Jitesh Agrawal
Re: Kashmiris are not Indian we want freedom
by Jitesh Agrawal on Sep 30, 2010 11:26 AM

you will get freedom for sure, not in form what you dream of but in form of meeting with those 1 lakh in next world, hell


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Ruchika
India is great
by Ruchika on Sep 30, 2010 11:17 AM  | Hide replies


All of us always wonder why can't Indian establishment give a fiiting reply to Pakistan. Well the fact of the matter is India has as equal number of Pak sympathizers as in Pakistan, e.g. Congress, SP, BSP, RJD, Paswan, and not only this a gay known as King Khan to his stupid fool fans also praises Pakistan hires them like Wasim Akram, Shoaib Akhtar. Guys India is a weak country with vested interests Congress wants power, SRGay wants his movies to run etc...


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Vivek Chandra
Re: India is great
by Vivek Chandra on Sep 30, 2010 11:22 AM
What sort of s fitting reply you are talking about. Any misadventure will affect our ecomonic growth. It is better we sort it out within ourselves.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
hari
Re: Re: India is great
by hari on Sep 30, 2010 11:25 AM
vivek i think india is banking on some sort of arrangement with US..who will take care of paksitan on our behalf may be at a later date..to avoid full scale war involving india pak and china.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Vivek Chandra
Re: Re: Re: India is great
by Vivek Chandra on Sep 30, 2010 11:31 AM
It is quite unlikely that this is the back room deal. All the enlightened Indians know that the only way to relegate Paki threats to insignificance is by growing our economy. This is happening and you just have to keep your cool.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
MH
Re: Re: India is great
by MH on Sep 30, 2010 11:47 AM
We may have temporary setback with any strong action Pakistan. But, it will help us in long run. In fact, our economic growth will be much faster once Pakistan issue is solved. In fact, GOI is spending thousands of crores of rupees on Kashmir, which is our money...without much revenue being generated from Kashmir.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Jitesh Agrawal
Re: Re: India is great
by Jitesh Agrawal on Sep 30, 2010 11:24 AM

fat,rahi,hai..... ready to die every day slowly but not ready to finish off things for once and all????

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Vivek Chandra
Re: Re: Re: India is great
by Vivek Chandra on Sep 30, 2010 11:27 AM
If US can not finish off N Korea for the fear of .... hoW can we possibly finish off Pak? Remember Vajpayee did not have balls to order attack even when our army marched to the border. Why didnt we attack then?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Jitesh Agrawal
Re: Re: Re: Re: India is great
by Jitesh Agrawal on Sep 30, 2010 11:35 AM

boss you dont understand a thing and want to blabber for the sake of it...... going for a was is not at all required when you can finish off your enemy with other means...... the movement of forces to border with pakistan, operation parakram, was not to fight a war but a tactical move where pakis were forced to do the same, India being far bigger economy could take that expense but pakis felt the pinch within 15 days only to run all over the world begging to intervene and request India to take back its forces...... thats one of the ways how you can kill an enemy without a fight

your grandpa and grandma in nehru who was fooling around with lady mountbaten wasnt even aware that tribals and pak army has captured half of kashmir and in a knee jerk reaction went crying to UN for mediation, and Indira had 90,000 PoW after 71 wars but let all of them go without asking pakis to vacate PoK, why did she go to fight bangladesh war then????

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Vivek Chandra
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: India is great
by Vivek Chandra on Sep 30, 2010 12:10 PM
You should read my message before writing wild comments. The economic growth is what I have been advocating and for this to happen we need to avoid an environment of hostility in our region and on borders. You are basing your argument on our bigger economy viz. 'India being a far bigger economy ...' Well this is the point. In this game economy matters. In a way you agree that I have said but you are trying to have a different position 'cos that probably gives you some satisfaction.

I'd appreciate if you refrain from making personal comments. I can make comments about your grands and that would not lead us anywhere. This only shows you do not a have a point.

Now coming to capturing of western Kashmnir by tribals. You should know that we (India) could have acted only after Hari Singh had signed the accession papers. And that is what we did. However this was not early enough to stop Pak tribals from invading from the west. As a matter of fact Hari Singh signed the instrument of accession only after realising that Pakistan can capture Kashmir by tribal attacks.

1971 war was about east Pakistan and we were successful in dividing Pakistan in two pieces. We could not have asked for more. It is under Geneva convention that PoWs are returned to the surrendering party. They can not be bartered for other previledges. If you had waited for pakistan to vacate the occupied Kashmir for PoWs then I am sure you would have been still feeding those captives inyour prisons even tod

Forward   |   Report abuse
Almighty
Re: India is great
by Almighty on Sep 30, 2010 11:24 AM
HATS OFF RUCHIKA.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
hari
Re: India is great
by hari on Sep 30, 2010 11:19 AM
hahahhahahha

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sachin Tyagi
Re: Re: India is great
by Sachin Tyagi on Sep 30, 2010 11:24 AM
Vivek , are you sure what u want to convey ??

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Vivek Chandra
Re: Re: Re: India is great
by Vivek Chandra on Sep 30, 2010 11:32 AM
This is a good question!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
aleem Baig
Re: India is great
by aleem Baig on Sep 30, 2010 11:36 AM
yes like George & co. killed innocent young intelligent indians in kargil..u idot it is not indiviusal it is the govt. u like to wear khaki chaddi that is the problem..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Total 246 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10   Older >   >>
Write a message