Discussion Board

100 years on, Mumbai then and now


Total 769 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15   Older >   >>
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
geqgewv
Re: Mumbai does not belong to Maharshatra
by geqgewv on Oct 24, 2010 12:58 AM
Mumbai is Maharashtrian. Go to Kolkata and try saying that it is not Bengali. Go to Chennai and say it is not Madrasi. Go to Bangalore and say it is not Kannada. See what reaction you get.

Just because Mumbai is more liberal and permissive these outsiders take advantage of us. They are solely responsible for the rise of conservative forces like Shiv Sena. If they had learnt to assimilate then there would be no Sena. But no, they want to live here AND abuse the system as well.

You get what you deserved. No sympathy for the outsiders. Live peacefully, respect others, and assimilate- and you will be left alone

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
soutik das
Re: Re: Mumbai does not belong to Maharshatra
by soutik das on Oct 24, 2010 03:07 PM
Mumbai is more liberal???
Dont make me laugh.
WB has more Biharis than in Maharashtra.They dont create any problem here. Y u guys have problem?

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
SHANTANU KARMAKAR
Mumbai does not belong to Maharashtra
by SHANTANU KARMAKAR on Oct 23, 2010 10:25 PM  | Hide replies

Mumbai is run by people from Outside Maharashtra. Otherwise it would have died long back. Jai Bharat. ( Mumbai does not belong to Maharshatra). Jai Hind.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Wisdom Quest
Typo
by Wisdom Quest on Oct 23, 2010 09:26 PM

Motor taxis were introduced in 1911 & not in 1811.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 769 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15   Older >   >>
Write a message