Re: Re: DOES ANYONE FIND ANY SECULAR IN ABOVE PIC
by A Singh on Oct 07, 2010 01:48 AM
Share e dhacan...shor machae shor..this guy is an absolute insult to islam..and its peaceful preachings...this are the kind of guys you want to be thrown out. Just cause he has beard doesnt mean anything...he is a politician and to use his electoral votes he has to always have his community fight with others... Unfortunately most of the people in his community are like you...
Re: Re: Re: DOES ANYONE FIND ANY SECULAR IN ABOVE PIC
by siddharth on Oct 07, 2010 01:25 AM
idiot of Deccan. He survives on communal politics he never want hindos and musloms come togeather. always creates trouble
Mr. Asaduddin Owaisi is correct by saying that the court has given decision based on faith. But even Quran is based on faith. All holy books are thousands of years old and it is impossible to prove a point on exactly who made or wrote them but still we have faith and follow them... and technically these holy books are so accurate and advanced that we always try to implement its knowledge for a successful life. When the mosque was excavated as per courts order, many proof were found in line of existance of a possible temple in that place. This issue didnt start mere in 1940s but right since the mosque was made in 1540s and was carried on all through the british rule... When only this place came under dispute there must be some reason behind. If we go on disputing every thing, we can never arrive to a solution. I think faith is the best way to arrive to a solution and existance of Ramjanmabhumi is also mentioned in Ramayana and Geeta. Court has never in its history given any verdict for any person on the basis of faith... but this is a matter of God whom no one can see nor touch but only feel by faith... whether it is Hindu/Muslim/Christian or any religion...
Re: Every religion is based on faith only...
by A Singh on Oct 07, 2010 01:50 AM
u have too much of logic...its too difficult to followers of this peaceful religion to coexist with others..
This owaisi guy cannot think of solving the problem, if it gets solved, he will get unemployed overnight. Same for the lawyers who want to go to Supreme court, the lingering enables them to survive for few more years. None of them have the larger interests of the muslims in mind
Asaduddin Owaisi is only trying to prove to the people that he is the voice of indian muslims. I would anyday agree to what madani said a few days back. Indian muslims have a long way to go to be financially strong. their life does not depend on this judgement, they have other things to do like making a living and making sure their children get the best possible education. This guy being an MP is earning lackhs and wants to use the poor muslims for his own benefit. Its time for the entire muslim community to shun such people and just focus on how wuld they want their son or daughter to be the next ABDUL KALAM...
Re: Inflamatory
by jaggu on Oct 06, 2010 11:36 PM
his family supported Nizam in mass killing of Hindus...if he is your representative get your 72 simcards..for free.
Re: Re: Inflamatory
by true muslim on Oct 06, 2010 11:42 PM
which part of my msg did u gather that i am refering him to as our representative. And by the way if this is true then his family not only killed hindus but muslims too in that bomb blast
Re: Re: Re: Inflamatory
by siddharth on Oct 07, 2010 01:28 AM
He has 200 crore empire in dubai and middle east. still he fools poor muslims of hyd and making money.
Re: Can you imagine what would be their stance
by Riv on Oct 06, 2010 10:47 PM
Ok.aadipiran(azzholz).lets shed blood again..and rediscover it is dark red in color and smells...
Re: Re: Can you imagine what would be their stance
by aadipiran on Oct 06, 2010 10:50 PM
I didn't prescribe violence. But there is no need to grovel and ask these losers in the court to talk.
Mr Owaisi should know that one of the Judges gave his observations that the Masjid was built with some pillars of the demolished temple hence it cannot be called a Mosque.What if the Supreme Court says that the Entire Land belongs to Temple still will he disagree with the Supreme Court ?
