It is not the QUANTITY but the QUALITY that matters. There are over a hundred muz1im for every J*w on planet earth. Still all the ArabianCountries, with their filthy oil wealth cannot do anything to a small country of just over six mi11ion.
Re: @ Altaf Rahman
by Altaf Rahman on Nov 20, 2010 03:31 PM
Coz they are ashamedly supported by US, Europe even when they are the worst human rights violaters.
Re: Re: @ Altaf Rahman
by Avinash on Nov 20, 2010 03:36 PM
The real fight is between the followers of three int0lerant WestAsianReligions. Fight and finish each other. All the best.
Re: Re: HINDUS must LEAVE HINDUISM AND BELIVE in AETHISM
by Abdul Shiyad on Nov 20, 2010 04:02 PM
sincere apologize Avnish bhai.. belief is a personal freedom... any one can believe in any philosophy ...
Re: Re: Re: HINDUS must LEAVE HINDUISM AND BELIVE in AETHISM
by Avinash on Nov 20, 2010 04:06 PM
Abdul, the problems are with the likes of "Sameeers" of all re1igions.
Re: HINDUS must LEAVE HINDUISM AND BELIVE in AETHISM
by Abdul Shiyad on Nov 20, 2010 04:00 PM
Sameer please don't spoil the name of Islam, people like you are a curse for Islam & Muslim in India
Re: HINDUS must LEAVE HINDUISM AND BELIVE in AETHISM
by Abdul Shiyad on Nov 20, 2010 04:00 PM
Sameer please don't spoil the name of Islam, people like you are a curse for Islam & Muslim in India
You will only succeed in creating hatred for the followers of your re1igion by such intermperate message. No power on earth can wipe out more than a billion people.
Re: Re: @ Altaf Rahman
by P Sameer on Nov 20, 2010 03:22 PM
jindal but you are growing fast and will takeover china shortly how can you blame on theres and deny the reality.
Re: Re: Re: @ Altaf Rahman
by Avinash on Nov 20, 2010 03:25 PM
In China they are compulsory one child norm; are you ready to accept even two child norm in India??
Re: Re: @ Altaf Rahman
by Avinash on Nov 20, 2010 03:18 PM
The population of West Pakistan in 1947 was 32 million and now it is about 180 million. Bengladesh is the most densely populated country in the world.
Re: @ P Sameer
by Altaf Rahman on Nov 20, 2010 03:34 PM
The population of India in 47 was 30 crores and now 120 crores. Just coz u grow only 4 times does not make west pak growth of 6 times a worst case.
Re: Re: @ P Sameer
by Avinash on Nov 20, 2010 03:38 PM
You don't find any difference between growing four times and six times!!!!!!! Wonderful mad_rassa education!!!!!!!!
Re: Re: Re: @ P Sameer
by Avinash on Nov 20, 2010 03:39 PM
That means if we had the same growth, the population in India would have been 180 crores instead of 120 crores. Do you understand the gravity of the situation???
Re: Re: Re: Re: @ P Sameer
by Altaf Rahman on Nov 20, 2010 03:44 PM
You mean to say 4 times growth is limit and 6 times growth is wrong. hats of to your intelligence. I know the figuers so dont explain me. I am showing the same crime committed by you. If you have any brain you would have understood that the pop growth has nothing to do with religion but on standard of living. If Japan and Singapore and Finland with negetive pop growth are alughing at west pak its reasonable but if you with 2.2% pop growth are commenting on countries with 3.2% pop growth its laugable.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @ P Sameer
by Altaf Rahman on Nov 20, 2010 03:48 PM
What you are saying is that you are waist deep in s.h.i.t and I am chest high in shit. So you are better off. Right??
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @ P Sameer
by Avinash on Nov 20, 2010 03:53 PM
Altaf, that is due to humpanch hamarapachees policy you guys follow. Are you ready to accept even two child norm in India???
