Discussion Board

'Obama's UNSC message just a diplomatic gesture'


Total 17 messages Pages | 1 | 2   Older >
Police Officer
And
by Police Officer on Nov 16, 2010 10:01 PM  | Hide replies

India, Pak & China must comply with UNSC resolutions and quit JK, POK & Aksai Chin.

Hyderabad - Hindu majority ruled by Nizam.
Kashmir - Muslim majority rule by Maharaja.

During partition, India annexed both regions.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Hemant Agrawal
Re: And
by Hemant Agrawal on Nov 21, 2010 08:01 PM
When you say "India annexed both regions" you seem to imply that it was done unilaterally by India. Kashmir asked for India's help when the Pakistani's were pillaging Kashmir in 1947. India refused to use it's army to protect a region not belonging to it. So Kashmir agreed to be annexed.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
A P
s t u pid indians........
by A P on Nov 16, 2010 02:54 AM

become so euphoric even at silly things like obama celebrating diwali, speaking in hindi and start thinking of themselves as a super power!!! All this shows immaturity of indians and how easily they can be taken for a ride.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
E darwin
Re: India should simply resign from UN
by E darwin on Nov 16, 2010 02:30 AM


have you seen the face of corruption in India and selective use of stick and EC rigging. everyone in world knows except indians.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
sudhir dhar
India should simply resign from UN
by sudhir dhar on Nov 16, 2010 02:07 AM  | Hide replies

We do not need UN's certiicate to be a golbal power, but we need to change desi's who are willin to sell India's power for money.
Case in point: Succesive PM's have stopped India's nuclear prgram under US influence , with the exception of Vajpayee.

As long as we will have people who will sell India's rights for money, India cannot be a global power, even though we potentially can be even bigger than China.

Imagine what will people like Pranab or Patel or Chibambaran or Lalu or Raja or Manmohan can do to further India's interests? Nothing except sell India, down the drain of history.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
E darwin
Re: India should simply resign from UN
by E darwin on Nov 16, 2010 02:29 AM
have you seen the face of corruption in India and selective use of stick and EC rigging. everyone in world knows except indians.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
aaaa
That means
by aaaa on Nov 16, 2010 01:56 AM

American president's will just lie for diplomatic gesture... No wonder nobody trusts America anymore.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
mahesh soni
Obama Visit
by mahesh soni on Nov 15, 2010 07:59 PM

I think Lisa has done an assessment of Obama's india visit in terms of Pakistan. What she has not recognised that India has moved on and already discussing increasing business opportunites in east Asia, Africa and how to contain China's assertive foreing policy.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Shrujal Vakharia
Another spin!
by Shrujal Vakharia on Nov 15, 2010 07:22 PM

Calculated move or not, I think it certainly helped! Oh wait, Lisa represents the GOP, so no wonder how she interprets this!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Aum Company
vain rhetoric
by Aum Company on Nov 15, 2010 02:14 PM  | Hide replies

It is all but obvious that the US has no intention of pushing India at the UNSC.
The verbal support to this end earned a lot of goodwill that the US can bank upon for sale of arms and job creation at home.
Only Indians can put stock in the vain rhetoric which has no substance.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Vivek Dev
Re: vain rhetoric
by Vivek Dev on Nov 15, 2010 03:44 PM
Right

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Ravi
Symbolic or Diplomatic Gesture! So be it!!
by Ravi on Nov 15, 2010 02:03 PM

Even this was not there some years back. Now this is not made in the case of China for South China sea or Yellow Sea or East China Sea. So no need to worry about this now.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
NR
Obama and his purpose in visitng India.
by NR on Nov 15, 2010 10:32 AM

His main purpose, right from day one, was to nudge India to open its economy and make room for american companies to do business in India. Another purpose was to drop a few feelers to find possibilities for putting some cracks in china-pakistan nexus, using India. The rest was just sweet talk. If Indian polliticians are so gullible, and have rosy glasses on their eyes, its a fault of none other, but their own.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 17 messages Pages: | 1 | 2   Older >
Write a message