Re: Re: Re: read
by tajender on Mar 18, 2010 02:25 AM
brhmnc rulers of India constitute a micro-minority of 2% in this land of over 1,300 millions. They were ruling it even during the Muslim and British rule. Except the “Golden period of Indian history” during the Budhist rule when they were made mince meat, they have always been the Bhoodevatas who finally finished Budhism and drove it out of India.
Re: Re: Re: Re: read
by E darwin on Mar 18, 2010 03:18 AM
Tajender, we talked about Mullahs and their role with moghuls such as Aurengzed, etc. The Rabbis, Padris,
Re: Re: Re: Re: read
by such jano on Mar 18, 2010 02:58 AM
what is your logic that %age population should be afactor to decide who get what, MadarChodsLikeYou pull the nation behind.
Re: Re: Re: Re: read
by E darwin on Mar 18, 2010 03:18 AM
Tajender, we talked about Mullahs and their role with moghuls such as Aurengzed, etc. The Rabbis, Padris,
Re: Re: Re: Re: read
by Rupakshi on Mar 18, 2010 04:55 AM
Brahmins never ruled. they were living in some forests in huts. Without them there is no culture, art music, dance or anything worthwhile to thing to say about India. If they are not there, no one would have known the existence of Valmikis or vyasa. We all would have been tribals. We are behaving like that now and giving India back to foreign rule.
"Wherever she goes, she will henceforth be greeted with garland of notes and not with garland of flowers," state PWD Minister Naseemuddin Siddiqui told media persons after the meeting.
