Yes, Rahul has started now leaving his impact. He is young, energetic, all congressmen are behind him and accept his governance. This power is with none in opposition.
Re: Rahul
by vijaya kumar on Jan 22, 2010 02:21 PM
It is natural, all congressmen are behind him. They want to enjoy life with poor Indians and taxpayers money.
What this young MP of India is doing never done by any of the other elected representative, who are otherwise elected on the basis of adult franchiese of Republic India.
Naturally all those sleeping MP's who have always believed in fooling the electorate are now exposed to thier nudity of political philosophy.
Rahul is doing his job the way he is groomed to do public service.
Re: INDIA'S OPPOSITION IS OUR CORRUPT SYSTEM.
by Srikanth on Jan 22, 2010 12:56 PM
Rahul can do something on price rise rather concentrating on this silly politics. First do something on the poor rather doing this sort of political gimmicks. But Mr. Chougan, Can you do something to your state rather concentrating on this.
Re: INDIA'S OPPOSITION IS OUR CORRUPT SYSTEM.
by VASUDEVAN V on Jan 22, 2010 12:53 PM
Oh, I never knew going to Colleges and hobnobbing with college students is public service. Perhaps it is public service `Gandhi style' (not Mahatma Gandhi, of course, as the surname is a borrowed one!)
Re: INDIA'S OPPOSITION IS OUR CORRUPT SYSTEM.
by vijaya kumar on Jan 22, 2010 12:56 PM
Let him enjoy life with touring all India and making picnic with poor man's and taxpayers money. He is a great leader who faught for independence of India and brought independence to India.
Re: INDIA'S OPPOSITION IS OUR CORRUPT SYSTEM.
by vijaya kumar on Jan 22, 2010 12:55 PM
Let him enjoy life with touring all India and making picnic with poor man's and taxpayers money. He is a great leader who faught for independence of India and brought independence to India.
Re: Re: INDIA'S OPPOSITION IS OUR CORRUPT SYSTEM.
by guru iyer on Jan 22, 2010 01:03 PM
Respected Sir, DMRC has transformed and completely alter our urban life style in Delhi. Thanks to DMRC. Although I have following qualms which I sincerely hope that DMRC will respond keeping in mind the bias to particular gender. At the outset, I would like to bring to your kind attention that while (ladies) claiming to be equal are getting reserved seats, I don’t really understand that what criteria they are getting reserved seats in Delhi Metro. The actual fact is that equally some times higher than them we are being pushed around in the crowded train, it is a collective action, and we cannot put blame on anyone or any particular gender for this act, this is very obvious and common happening in the crowded area, whether it is Delhi Metro, DTC Bus, or Trade Fair, or else where. This should not be criteria for getting reserved seats for particular gender. Many times ladies seats are occupied by young girls, these forces to aged, and women with children are not able to occupy “For Ladies only”, results standing their entire journey, Since “For Ladies only” purely on compassionate ground, hence “they cannot claim it as their rights”, and they are not paying any extra charges for their reservation, where as other reservations are concerned it serves all genders, hence it should be continued or to be extended further. Abolish “For Ladies Only” seats in a phased manner and it should “First come First Sit” basis. Educate them for reason for abolishing “For Ladies Only” sea
Re: Re: Re: INDIA'S OPPOSITION IS OUR CORRUPT SYSTEM.
by guru iyer on Jan 22, 2010 01:06 PM
Educate them for reason for abolishing “For Ladies Only” seats. Even if “Ladies only” reserved seats are still offered despite our logical protest, priority/privileges should be for aged, expectant and ladies with children, and educate them accordingly until they are getting matured enough to understand “Why and what is the purpose of “Ladies Seats” are being reserved while they are claiming to be equal to opposite gender. Regarding other reservation like ‘For Old/Physically challenged’ could be both genders, hence no issues, whereas “For Ladies only” favors particular gender, though we are paying to DMRC equal fare, like opposite gender, this is totally unprincipled, unfair and unacceptable. Perhaps if aged men are accidentally happened to sit in the “Ladies Reserved Seats” young girls/ladies have the rights aged men to vacate the “ladies seats”, vice versa if aged women, pregnant, ladies with children don’t have rights to vacate the seats from younger one, it is very ridicules, and it does not serve the actual purpose of reservation. When we are paying equally, how can DMRC’s act favors particular gender not keeping the above facts in your mind. Since DMRC is serving the public commercially, it is not a charitable one, our relation is with you is also purely commercial; here how can you allow you, bypass social welfare term to by pass commercial term that too in this case, and particular gender’s cost. You should not allow/bring Govt. social welfare policies to comm
Digvijay Singh wants to know what action he (MP Chief Minister) has taken against the ABVP 'hooligans who killed Prof Sabharwal.' Can Digvijay Singh himself answer what action Congress has taken against the congressmen and congress leaders who killed more than 3,000 Sikhs on the streets of Delhi alone in the aftermath of Indira Gandhi's assassination. Since that incident took place in 1984, much before Sabharwal's murder and Gujarat riots, an answer in regard to Sikh murders is long overdue. Will some Congressman put his hand up and answer to the nation?
What this young MP of India is doing never done by any of the other elected representative, who are otherwise elected on the basis of adult franchiese of Republic India.
Naturally all those sleeping MP's who have always believed in fooling the electorate are now exposed to thier nudity of political philosophy.
Rahul is doing his job the way he is groomed to do public service.
Re: INDIA'S OPPOSITION IS OUR CORRUPT SYSTEM.
by guru iyer on Jan 22, 2010 01:07 PM
Educate them for reason for abolishing “For Ladies Only” seats. Even if “Ladies only” reserved seats are still offered despite our logical protest, priority/privileges should be for aged, expectant and ladies with children, and educate them accordingly until they are getting matured enough to understand “Why and what is the purpose of “Ladies Seats” are being reserved while they are claiming to be equal to opposite gender. Regarding other reservation like ‘For Old/Physically challenged’ could be both genders, hence no issues, whereas “For Ladies only” favors particular gender, though we are paying to DMRC equal fare, like opposite gender, this is totally unprincipled, unfair and unacceptable. Perhaps if aged men are accidentally happened to sit in the “Ladies Reserved Seats” young girls/ladies have the rights aged men to vacate the “ladies seats”, vice versa if aged women, pregnant, ladies with children don’t have rights to vacate the seats from younger one, it is very ridicules, and it does not serve the actual purpose of reservation. When we are paying equally, how can DMRC’s act favors particular gender not keeping the above facts in your mind. Since DMRC is serving the public commercially, it is not a charitable one, our relation is with you is also purely commercial; here how can you allow you, bypass social welfare term to by pass commercial term that too in this case, and particular gender’s cost. You should not allow/bring Govt. social welfare policies to comm
With Rahulji's rise in politics there is rise everywhere in India. There is rise in prices of essential commodities, daily used food items. There is rise in unemployment, rise in job loss, rise in povery, rise in poor and crorepathis, rise in children dying of malnutration, rise in corruption, rise in swiss bank account, rise in balck money, rise in looting of pubilc money by politicians,etc. etc. Everywhere there is rise and rise only. Rahulji jai ho.
i still cant understand whthr we indians deserve greatleaders like rahulji.we indians are not loyal,trustworthy .we are not loyal to this family which brought independence for indians.thatswhy no country likes indians
Re: wat
by vijaya kumar on Jan 22, 2010 12:33 PM
Let him enjoy life with touring all India and making picnic with poor man's and taxpayers money. He is a great leader who faught for independence of India and brought independence to India.
Re: wat
by Srinivasan natesan on Jan 22, 2010 11:52 AM
Are you sure, only their family got independence or enjoing the fruits of independence? Therest of the people are all crap? Be reasonable in posting? Do not let your name reflect in your words.
