im not a confress supporter but see no wrong in rahul is visiting the universities. i think more young leaders should do so to understand better what the generation looking for from them. but i can assure none will carry the aura like a gandhi. but leaders have to reinvent them selves and just not play lip services or go for a photo op.
im not a confress supporter but see no wrong in rahul is visiting the universities. i think more young leaders should do so to understand better what the generation looking for from them. but i can assure none will carry the aura like a gandhi. but leaders have to reinvent them selves and just not play lip services or go for a photo op.
If it is so, he should ask soniaji to dissolve the so called congressi party, which was the wishes of our father of nation, mahatma Gandhi. Nehruji disagree with Gandhiji and convert congress into a ruling party of landlords and cororepathis as he want to enjoy power. If Rahulji really want to serve the poor and needy Rahulji should join some non-political organisation / NGO's, where he can better serve the poor.
Re: BJP office already clsoed
by vijaya kumar on Jan 22, 2010 02:26 PM
Sandeep India is a democratic country due to majority of Hindus. If India were a muslim majority country, then it will be an Islamic country like pakistan instead of a democratic country. See what is happening around in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afganistan.
Re: Re: BJP office already clsoed
by abdul on Jan 23, 2010 09:24 AM
DEAR VIJAYA KUMAR,
THERE ARE A HUNDREDS OF ISLAMIC COUNTRY IN THIS WORLD. IF PAKISTAN IS A VIOLENT COUNTRY BUT NOT OTHERS. MAJORITY ISLAMIC COUNTRIES ARE VERY PEACEFUL, YOU MUST CONSIDER IT INSTEAD GOING BEHIND ONE AND ONLY PAK.
INDIA IS ONLY ONE HINDU COUNTRY IN THIS WORLD, YOU MUST SEE WHAT THE RSS, VHP, BHAJ DAL, SHIV SENA IS DOING.,
Re: Re: Re: BJP office already clsoed
by vijaya kumar on Jan 23, 2010 12:50 PM
abdul India is not a hindu country. It is a democratic country eventhough majority people are hindus. If it was majority muslim country then it would have been converted into Islamic country and would not be a democratic country and hindus would not have freedom to perform their religion.
Re: Re: Re: BJP office already clsoed
by deepak marla on Jan 23, 2010 12:58 PM
Out of all the Islamic countries, there is only one country which is democratic, that is Indonesia. Even, this is also because of the Hindu influence that the majority have.
Respected Sir, DMRC has transformed and completely alter our urban life style in Delhi. Thanks to DMRC. Although I have following qualms which I sincerely hope that DMRC will respond keeping in mind the bias to particular gender. At the outset, I would like to bring to your kind attention that while (ladies) claiming to be equal are getting reserved seats, I don’t really understand that what criteria they are getting reserved seats in Delhi Metro. The actual fact is that equally some times higher than them we are being pushed around in the crowded train, it is a collective action, and we cannot put blame on anyone or any particular gender for this act, this is very obvious and common happening in the crowded area, whether it is Delhi Metro, DTC Bus, or Trade Fair, or else where. This should not be criteria for getting reserved seats for particular gender. Many times ladies seats are occupied by young girls, these forces to aged, and women with children are not able to occupy “For Ladies only”, results standing their entire journey, Since “For Ladies only” purely on compassionate ground, hence “they cannot claim it as their rights”, and they are not paying any extra charges for their reservation, where as other reservations are concerned it serves all genders, hence it should be continued or to be extended further. Abolish “For Ladies Only” seats in a phased manner and it should “First come First Sit” basis. Educa
Re: WOMEN RESERVATION
by guru iyer on Jan 22, 2010 01:01 PM
Abolish “For Ladies Only” seats in a phased manner and it should “First come First Sit” basis. Educate them for reason for abolishing “For Ladies Only” seats. Even if “Ladies only” reserved seats are still offered despite our logical protest, priority/privileges should be for aged, expectant and ladies with children, and educate them accordingly until they are getting matured enough to understand “Why and what is the purpose of “Ladies Seats” are being reserved while they are claiming to be equal to opposite gender. Regarding other reservation like ‘For Old/Physically challenged’ could be both genders, hence no issues, whereas “For Ladies only” favors particular gender, though we are paying to DMRC equal fare, like opposite gender, this is totally unprincipled, unfair and unacceptable. Perhaps if aged men are accidentally happened to sit in the “Ladies Reserved Seats” young girls/ladies have the rights aged men to vacate the “ladies seats”, vice versa if aged women, pregnant, ladies with children don’t have rights to vacate the seats from younger one, it is very ridicules, and it does not serve the actual purpose of reservation. When we are paying equally, how can DMRC’s act favors particular gender not keeping the above facts in your mind. Since DMRC is serving the public commercially, it is not a charitable one, our relation is with you is also purely commercial; here how can you allow you, bypass social welfare term to by pass commercial term that too in this case,
Respected Sir, DMRC has transformed and completely alter our urban life style in Delhi. Thanks to DMRC. Although I have following qualms which I sincerely hope that DMRC will respond keeping in mind the bias to particular gender. At the outset, I would like to bring to your kind attention that while (ladies) claiming to be equal are getting reserved seats, I don’t really understand that what criteria they are getting reserved seats in Delhi Metro. The actual fact is that equally some times higher than them we are being pushed around in the crowded train, it is a collective action, and we cannot put blame on anyone or any particular gender for this act, this is very obvious and common happening in the crowded area, whether it is Delhi Metro, DTC Bus, or Trade Fair, or else where. This should not be criteria for getting reserved seats for particular gender. Many times ladies seats are occupied by young girls, these forces to aged, and women with children are not able to occupy “For Ladies only”, results standing their entire journey, Since “For Ladies only” purely on compassionate ground, hence “they cannot claim it as their rights”, and they are not paying any extra charges for their reservation, where as other reservations are concerned it serves all genders, hence it should be continued or to be extended further. Abolish “For Ladies Only” seats in a phased manner and it should “First come First Sit” basis. Educa
