Discussion Board

Raj Thackeray-Azmi in war of words again


Total 1321 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35   Older >   >>
Mind Clear
Learn to Succeed
by Mind Clear on Oct 31, 2009 07:27 PM  | Hide replies

English is the language of success.
Entire world of technology runs on it.
US and UK will always rule the world.
Abu & Raj are both idiots. Economics
of the successful with always win.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
abhishek deshpande
Re: Learn to Succeed
by abhishek deshpande on Oct 31, 2009 07:40 PM
Will Mr.Abu azmi say these words in chennai? If he has those gutts then he should show his gutts and make these statements in south indian states.Whole India teaches only Maharashtra what to do and what not to do.Every state has its own language and if you are MLA from that state you are bound to learn that language.This is must.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
howudoudo
Re: Learn to Succeed
by howudoudo on Oct 31, 2009 07:30 PM

Raj is not against English. He is against the vote bank created by UP Bihari vote bank politicians.



   Forward   |   Report abuse
pravin patel
Re: Re: Learn to Succeed
by pravin patel on Oct 31, 2009 07:33 PM
in gujarat not only gujarati but people from up,bihar & rajasthan are with modi,no question of vote bank by s.p.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
sacchi baat
Re: Re: Learn to Succeed
by sacchi baat on Oct 31, 2009 07:37 PM
SPEAKER HAS TO GRANT HINDI TO AABU ACCORDING TO CONSTITUTION AGA BAAI KITTI MAJJA

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
robin
Re: Learn to Succeed
by robin on Oct 31, 2009 07:33 PM
English_is_thelanguage that_everybody is using on this forum be it pro-bhindi OR pro_marathiparathi.LOLZzzzzz

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
abhishek deshpande
Re: A question you must answer?
by abhishek deshpande on Oct 31, 2009 07:44 PM
Mr.Shailendra Singh, if marathi people come in your UP and Bihar states and say that we dont understand hindi,talk in marathi will you tolerate it?First concentrate on your states development then talk about maharashtra,you cant bound things on us.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
giveanid
Re: A question you must answer?
by giveanid on Oct 31, 2009 07:34 PM
We watch Hindi movies like we watch WWF. We dont expect sense or logic.

Anyway... we wont learn Hindi. Deal with it.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Jay
Re: Re: A question you must answer?
by Jay on Oct 31, 2009 08:21 PM
If you hate Hindi 'our national language' so much, why do you guys want to be a part of India ?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
KEDAR DEO
Re: A question you must answer?
by KEDAR DEO on Oct 31, 2009 07:31 PM
why dont u concentrate on developement in up and bihar
that would be more friutful.
this guy gets elected from mumbai and does not even speak marathi.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Jay
Re: Re: A question you must answer?
by Jay on Oct 31, 2009 08:23 PM
Mumbai should be renamed to BOMBAY and shud be made a separate state.

This island city was built by the Britishers specifically for trade purpose, and they built a port here. And the Marathis lay claim to it..

by changing the name they cannot change history

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Jay
Re: Re: Re: A question you must answer?
by Jay on Oct 31, 2009 10:40 PM
if you take out the gujarathis, parsis, south Indians out of Mumbai...

then this island city wud stop progressing,... and will start going backwards in all fields

   Forward   |   Report abuse
howudoudo
Re: A question you must answer?
by howudoudo on Oct 31, 2009 07:29 PM

you b_eg_g_ar. we r not here to answer ur queries.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Anand Krish
Re: A question you must answer?
by Anand Krish on Oct 31, 2009 07:37 PM
Which Tamilian is watching Hindi movies? A few may watch it for sleaze scnes. Nothing else

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
sacchi baat
FACT
by sacchi baat on Oct 31, 2009 07:27 PM  | Hide replies

iN TODAYS SAMNA TATA HAS CONDUTED SURVEY FOR BMC,IT SHOWS MARATHIS ARE ONLY 18 PERCENT THAT MEANS NON MARATHIS R 82 PERCENT.NON MARATHI REALLY RULES IN MUMBAI

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Jay
Re: FACT
by Jay on Oct 31, 2009 10:38 PM
that's a fact.. Mumbai is rules by non marathis

   Forward   |   Report abuse
howudoudo
Re: FACT
by howudoudo on Oct 31, 2009 07:28 PM

what is a b_e_g_g_a_r like u talking abt Mumbai ?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
prasanna kumar
Lets have sanskrit as language
by prasanna kumar on Oct 31, 2009 07:25 PM  | Hide replies

Its a known fact that all languages have evolved from sanskrit, lets abolish all languages and have only sanskrit.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Jay
Re: Lets have sanskrit as language
by Jay on Oct 31, 2009 08:26 PM
YES... and lets all go back to stone ages!!

dost the world has evolved and we all have to revolve around the English language. Evrything related to IT is in English. This forum also is in English.

You are free to go ahead with your sanskrit, but don't force it on all others

   Forward   |   Report abuse
pak detector
Jobs in the states should be only reserved for the local people
by pak detector on Oct 31, 2009 07:25 PM  | Hide replies

Maharashrians jobs for Marathis only. Karnataka jobs für Kannada speakers only.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
pravin patel
Re: Jobs in the states should be only reserved for the local peop
by pravin patel on Oct 31, 2009 07:27 PM
why no blast in pak. today?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
howudoudo
Re: Re: Jobs in the states should be only reserved for the local
by howudoudo on Oct 31, 2009 07:32 PM
pravin patel,
r u from Pak or u have ur near and dear ones there, that u r concerned abt bomb blasts there.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
KEDAR DEO
Re: Jobs in the states should be only reserved for the local peop
by KEDAR DEO on Oct 31, 2009 07:32 PM
no job for pakis
taliban jobs only u can do

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
giveanid
Re: Re: Impose Hindi on Madrasis first
by giveanid on Oct 31, 2009 07:36 PM
Yes. Move your Bihar away from us please.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
prasanna kumar
Re: Impose Hindi on Madrasis first
by prasanna kumar on Oct 31, 2009 07:25 PM
You are cr@zy dude, want to split the country because of a language.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
terminator
Re: Re: Impose Hindi on Madrasis first
by terminator on Oct 31, 2009 07:27 PM
Prasanna. All most all the Mus living in Hindi states are not speaking Hindi they are speaking Urdu The language of Pakisthan. Language makes the people attract to a perticular community or country.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
robin
Re: Re: Re: Impose Hindi on Madrasis first
by robin on Oct 31, 2009 07:32 PM
so Hindus in USA speaking english become anti-india?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
PiratefrmSomalia
Re: Impose Hindi on Madrasis first
by PiratefrmSomalia on Oct 31, 2009 07:25 PM
Hindi is the national language only in north india. Below Maharashtra nobody even cares two hoots for Hindi.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
KEDAR DEO
Re: Re: Impose Hindi on Madrasis first
by KEDAR DEO on Oct 31, 2009 07:34 PM
good one man


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
PiratefrmSomalia
Re: real intension
by PiratefrmSomalia on Oct 31, 2009 07:26 PM
Abu azmi is dawoods frontman. Why is the IT dept and other govt depts not investigating his wealth!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Bipin Musale
Raj Thackeray is right
by Bipin Musale on Oct 31, 2009 07:22 PM  | Hide replies

Abu should also take along with him his voters to UP. The scheme of northern politicians is becoming more and more evident. They want to separate Mumbai from Maharashtra.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Total 1321 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35   Older >   >>
Write a message