Re: Haramohan Roy - Re: Re: Maoists why not name them terrorists
by Prakash Chandra on Oct 27, 2009 11:25 PM
Terrorists are anti nationals. Maoists thinks they are ultra nationals. That is the difference.
Re: Re: Haramohan Roy - Re: Re: Maoists why not name them terror
by D S on Oct 27, 2009 11:28 PM
dont want to hear from ggYpsies who are in denial and lie a lot
Re: Re: Re: Haramohan Roy - Re: Re: Maoists why not name them te
by Prakash Chandra on Oct 27, 2009 11:37 PM
Please listen to me or else your gyppsy lot will take my life out. Gyppssy lot means your Maoists friends.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Haramohan Roy - Re: Re: Maoists why not name the
by D S on Oct 27, 2009 11:43 PM
you are in _dDenial i.e no _sSpirits, just a robot, this is why you sense of _hHumour is stale
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Haramohan Roy - Re: Re: Maoists why not name
by Prakash Chandra on Oct 27, 2009 11:46 PM
Every body don't think so. I go by democratic majority, DS.
If you observe the Prachanda game in Nepal, the Lalgarh game in WB, where they kill CPIM ppl, the fragmentation of India is most important to them, and we have these elements on a golden platter.
Re: @JGN-No conspiracy theory
by JGN on Oct 27, 2009 11:25 PM
Nepal is too small a country and the insurgency in Nepal was due to the autocratic ways of the Kings. Naxalism can fourish only in such an atmosphere. There is no comparison between Nepal and India.
"Classical Communists" even believed that Mahtma Gandhi was the one who sabotaged "revolution" in India by acting as a sort of "pressure relief valve"!
Re: Re: @JGN-No conspiracy theory
by icshyderabad on Oct 27, 2009 11:36 PM
My dear JGN, Prachanda and Ganapathi are from here only. Yes-Nepal is too small with much more corruption, hence the shortlived maoist rule. But then what do you want to say? They should be left free to act as they like?
Re: JGN - Re: Maoists why not name them terrorists
by JGN on Oct 27, 2009 11:15 PM
That is skewed logic. There are no special rights for the tribals just because their ancestors were living in the forests. Can we now go back to the deep forests of Africa as our ancestors came from there?
Re: Re: Re: JGN - Re: Maoists why not name them terrorists
by JGN on Oct 27, 2009 11:21 PM
Though I am not a naxal, I was once a hardcore Students union activist. Though the ideology of naxals (now the present lot of extortionists) are good, they are neither feasible for good in the long run. What is required is substinable developement.
Re: JGN - Re: Maoists why not name them terrorists
by Haramohan Roy on Oct 27, 2009 11:17 PM
DS, please remember that the Union of India is a free country, and everyone can live everywhere!
If there is a rule that tribals will live in tribal belts and non-tribals in non-tribal areas - then why call this one country?
Re: Re: Re: JGN - Re: Maoists why not name them terrorists
by D S on Oct 27, 2009 11:29 PM
Dont need to hear from ggYpsy people who are in denial, more lies with arrive.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: JGN - Re: Maoists why not name them terrorist
by Prakash Chandra on Oct 27, 2009 11:41 PM
Yes DS. I am not here to make illusionary revolution like some of great intellectuals here. I am happy with my ignorance.
Re: Certain things take their own time!!!
by bharatmeradesh on Oct 27, 2009 11:13 PM
We deserve to. Cowards like Indians should be punished. Ppl come to our country, slaughter ppl and all we do is light candles at India gate or sing new mournful songs. China invades our land and the army chief calls it a lie. Such a coward nation must be punished.
Re: Re: Bomb all of them
by bharatmeradesh on Oct 27, 2009 11:17 PM
Of coz you can try this on me if I behead a cop. I will support such an act rather than letting ppl debate on TV and lighting candles at India gate. I wonder why Indians show their bravery only against women in public places and never against the real enemies.
