Taliban strikes! LeT Strikes! Hizbul Mujahideen strikes! AL Qaeda Strikes! When will the Indian empire strike back! An army person getting killed in battlefield is different from an innocent person getting killed in a bomb blast or terrorist attack. Either Indian should take steps to dismantle terror groups in their border or give permission for guns to defend against terrorists as the attacks will keep on increasing.
Re: Re: Re: When will India take a tough stance?
by Bharat K on Mar 14, 2009 12:20 AM
most of these indians are welcomed with open arms by Saudis and then either they are converted or decimated.
Eventhough, the NZ grounds are small, the spinners (Harbhajhan, Vettori, Yuvraj, Yusuf) have restricted the total & have taken wickets, particularly between the 15th to 40th over's. Since, 25 overs is at stake, it is better to include Ojha instead of Rohit Sharma.
With this combination, we can easily win the final match also, as I have pointed in my earlier posts. The defeat in 20-20's was due to the selection of Irfan Pathan instead of talented Praveen Kumar. If, Praveen was selected, we would have definitely won atlest 1 match, if not both.
ALSO, MOST OF THE INDIAN TEAM DEFEATS IN THE PAST IN ODI'S HAS BEEN DUE TO THE PROBLEM OF 4TH & 5TH SPECIALIST BOWLERS.
India has lost 90% of its matches in the last 3 years, whenever Irfan Pathan has bowled.
Re: BEST TEAM FOR FINAL ODI.
by Bharat K on Mar 14, 2009 12:22 AM
I remember only one match where we lost in last 3 overs when Irfan bowled. But I remember plenty of matches when Srinath, Prasad, Kapil etc. bowled and we lost the matches we could have easily won. Compared to these so called Indian Greats, track record of Irfan Pathan is spectacular for winning matchs for India.
Re: Re: jinah never thought this kind of pak
by Indian on Mar 13, 2009 03:57 PM
don't blame Mahatma he never accept the split. But Jinah forced to do it.
Re: Re: Re: jinah never thought this kind of pak
by Bharat K on Mar 14, 2009 12:24 AM
Mahatma did not accept the split but allowed it to happen. The biggest mistake of Mahatma was to hand over India to a Dog called Nehr*. India would have been a happy and prosperous country had it been Sardar Patel in pace of Nehr** A**Hol*.
Re: I LIKED THIS WHAT I READ BELOW
by sarang joshi on Mar 13, 2009 03:46 PM
dnt worry...many people here cant digest truth..So your msg can be abused soon!!
Guns and weapons don't seem to be anti-islam. Techlologies that these militants use are not anti-islam. Killing unarmed, innocent people is not anti-islam. Desire of land and power is not anti-islam. Spending money on arms and weapons is not anti-islam. But cricket seems to be anti-islam.
The only agenda of these people is wipe out everything else that doesn't follow their ideology and they can go to any extent to achieve it.
The only solution to this problem is to drop a few nukes in these regions and wipe them out.
Re: Re: Pro-islam militants???
by Guest on Mar 13, 2009 03:59 PM
In the name of Islam, everything goes. I have watched these people from close quarters in an African country and their modus operandi of uniting their folk is Islam. Whatever they do not like, they call anti-Islam and tend to rally their people. India has progressed tremendously economically whilst Pak has just gone from bad to worse and this they seem not to be able to tolerate. Today India is progressing very well in cricket whilst no one wishes to play in Pak hence cricket becomes anti-Islam. Perhaps the mindset would be different if Pak were doing well.
Re: Pro-islam militants???
by Manish M on Mar 13, 2009 03:58 PM
kill them all...al terorists inpakistan..cut thm in2 pieces...burn them..giv thm th worst death tht any1 can imagin..or leav thm half dead..let thm know th pain..chop of their parts alive..in fronts of evry1...treat them like shit..so tht thy never dare to evn think of stepin in2 kashmir..or doin anythn against humanity..
