Discussion Board

What caused the BJP-BJD divorce


Total 209 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >
nai
Two wrongs -but only one highlighted? why?
by nai on Mar 11, 2009 09:24 PM  | Hide replies

I am completely fed up of this communal media and communal congress and UPA govt.

Look at how expert they are in their support to muslims and christians.
They only cry of the result not the cause.

1. Gujrat riots - nobody speaks what trigegred the riots. I think we need to remind media and these communal parties that it was muslims burning so many hindus inside the train bogey that triggered the violence. But no, they speak only of muslims being killed. what a hypocrisy?

2. Orissa violence - First these gundas hired by christian missionaries killed Swami Laxmananda. As a reaction, the violence trigegred at all parts of Orissa. neither media nor UPA condemned the killing of Swamiji. They only spoke of atrocities on christians? again a communal hypocrisy at its best.

So many hindus condemned post-violence in Gujrat and Orissa but show me a single muslim or christian who condemned the killing of godhra train hindus or Swamiji?
Ofcourse everyone has to bear the reaction of their own sins and hypocrisy. These real communal forces are becoming very happy now but they would have to bear the reaction of their mis-deeds.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Unjinx
Re: Two wrongs -but only one highlighted? why?
by Unjinx on Mar 11, 2009 09:40 PM
They have not realized that LKA is a special messenger sent to liberate Bharat*varsh. Nai, forgive them

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Prakash Asrani
Re: Re: Two wrongs -but only one highlighted? why?
by Prakash Asrani on Mar 11, 2009 11:01 PM
82 year old budhavoo LKA should liberate himself from his lust for PM's chair. As per old rules of Bharatvarsh, he should have retired 22 years back i.e. retire to jungle at the age of 60 years taking sanyas. Are rules of Bharatvarsh only meant for ordinary knickerwalas and othe non-knickerwalas?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Ritesh Mishra
Re: Two wrongs -but only one highlighted? why?
by Ritesh Mishra on Mar 11, 2009 09:29 PM
nai ,

Media is on PAYROL of Rahul Miliband Nehru .. Sonia Italy wali Bai ........and Yechuri -Du ka CHOR ..

Cannot expect more ...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
xxx yyy
We had great hopes for the BJP in Karnataka
by xxx yyy on Mar 11, 2009 09:11 PM  | Hide replies

And see what they are doing now. The power situation is so bad. Security is the worst we have ever seen. They target minorities and women. They burnt churches and attacked women and girls. It is no longer safe for women to go out and work. It is becoming a mini taliban, as they oppose women wearing jeans or pants. The commissioner says it is safe, but read the local and national dailies and you will know how safe it is. Recently they arrested 100 youngsters for having a private party saying that it was a drug raid. When they could not prove any drugs, they changed tactics and said they were selling liquour without a license. It was a private party as per all the newspaper reports. There is no more fun and joy. Youngsters and women supported the BJP, but the BJP Govt in turn is targeting them. It is one of the worst Govts Karnataka has ever had, with the exception of the Bangarappa Govt. It is now in all the international news that the CM did not meet the Central Home Minister to discuss the security situation thrice.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Ritesh Mishra
Re: We had great hopes for the BJP in Karnataka
by Ritesh Mishra on Mar 11, 2009 09:18 PM
give them some time man .. how long it is ?... they are trying .. years of Wrong doing cannot be corrected in few months ......

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Trend setter
Re: Re: We had great hopes for the BJP in Karnataka
by Trend setter on Mar 11, 2009 09:58 PM
they are creating new wrongs adding on to the common mans burdens. We voted for BJP the first time in Karnataka and we as many others are regretting our decision.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
piyush
Re: We had great hopes for the BJP in Karnataka
by piyush on Mar 12, 2009 12:17 AM
i voted for bjp nd im liking it there should be some culture and ethos pubbing is no sign of modernisation

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Ritesh Mishra
Analyses has its own Flaws !
by Ritesh Mishra on Mar 11, 2009 09:11 PM  | Hide replies

Had Naveen Patnaik been so COnscious about getting a Pseudo Secular TAG , he would have taken a FRESH mandate or a Vote of Confidence ( after thrwing BJP out ) , immideately after the Tribal -Kandhamal Incident ...

Fact that THIS has happened 4-5 months later on Eve of Elections , it truely reflects What are HIS and BJD's Real intentions are ..

Sheer Opprtunisim & Back stabbing is the appropriate name for it ..........

    Forward  |  Report abuse
CongressIN
Re: Analyses has its own Flaws !
by CongressIN on Mar 11, 2009 11:42 PM
Patanaik is another Deva Gowda. He demolished his father's good name. We thought naveen is a good person, now he exposed his real avatar.

He losts respects in our eyes and millions of Odyas. Odisha people are very dharmic minded, they don't like betraying, backstabing, type dirty politics.

BJP need to channelise this and peoples anger will burn Patanaiak.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
adguru
pm
by adguru on Mar 11, 2009 09:01 PM  | Hide replies

when our p m said mi n0 rit ie s particularly m us li m s should get first right to nation s resources it is ok and n 0n c0 m m u na l isn't it?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
nurul saiyed
Re: pm
by nurul saiyed on Mar 11, 2009 09:31 PM
Do't provoke the majority on the name of monority, you BJP promotor

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Ritesh Mishra
Re: Re: pm
by Ritesh Mishra on Mar 11, 2009 09:37 PM
ya NURUL SAIYED is your Name ..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
nurul saiyed
Re: Re: Re: pm
by nurul saiyed on Mar 11, 2009 09:40 PM
so what

   Forward   |   Report abuse
chotelal
Re: Re: Re: Re: pm
by chotelal on Mar 11, 2009 09:58 PM
You are Nurul Saiyed means nothing .. but if you think Talibanis are glorious freedom fighters, 9/11 was done by CIA and Jews, 26/11 was done by H!ndtva forces, Zakir Naik is all logical then you really are a brainless mozlem

   Forward   |   Report abuse
nurul saiyed
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: pm
by nurul saiyed on Mar 11, 2009 11:05 PM
Do't predict what i think and will not become brainless.Criminals are criminals, whether hindu or muslim and their fate must be weighted by strigent laws.


Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
chotelal
Re: pm
by chotelal on Mar 11, 2009 09:06 PM
Mozlems are creating havoc in Pakistan and Afghanistan, In Malaysia they are trying hard to implement Shariya, in Britain they are creating ruckus .. And all these hardlined Mozelms have widespread support in India ... Its but natural for h!ndus to look for a party who can protect their rights ... Congress is ready to bend for votes .. No Congress .. We need more Modis .. This madness needs to be checked

   Forward   |   Report abuse
nurul saiyed
Re: Re: pm
by nurul saiyed on Mar 11, 2009 09:39 PM
Day dreamer,wake up.
Write in plain paper.BJP will get the biggest set back in this election.
And for your kind information your darling party is giving political Ad. in website of GEO TV(PAKI).For what. TO invite jehadis to cast their vote

   Forward   |   Report abuse
CongressIN
Re: Re: Re: pm
by CongressIN on Mar 11, 2009 11:44 PM
And you nurul saiyad wil get kick out from our soil

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Ritesh Mishra
Re: Re: Re: pm
by Ritesh Mishra on Mar 11, 2009 09:44 PM
again the same thing .... you name is NURUL SAYEED ...... tht is why you talk the Crap ........ we know why you shout .....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
chotelal
Re: Re: Re: pm
by chotelal on Mar 11, 2009 09:55 PM
Good at least you agreed to one point .. those who visit Geo website are all Jehadis .. BTW why were you visiting that site?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
nurul saiyed
Re: Re: Re: Re: pm
by nurul saiyed on Mar 11, 2009 10:07 PM
To learn the paki taste on lankan team attack

   Forward   |   Report abuse
adguru
ok
by adguru on Mar 11, 2009 08:58 PM  | Hide replies

That is so called "Secularism" .. If Sonia Gandhi's Personal Secretary is Vincent George(Xtian), 3 most trusted political advisers are Ambika Soni(Xtian), Margaret Alwa(Xtian) and A K Anthony (XTian) then it is secularism .. but others are always communal ... Why is that all the trusted advisers of Sonia(Xtian) are Xtians? This really is very bad deed by Sonia and it smells of communality ..

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
adguru
Re: ok
by adguru on Mar 11, 2009 08:59 PM
we said 'chotelal'

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
chotelal
Re: Re: ok
by chotelal on Mar 11, 2009 09:02 PM
That was copyrighted material !!!!! All rights reserved !!!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
adguru
Re: Re: Re: ok
by adguru on Mar 11, 2009 09:03 PM
sorry.. actually red!ff was bl0cking most of my p0st with same words as you posted.. so just copied and tried to post and it worked!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
adguru
Re: Re: Re: ok
by adguru on Mar 11, 2009 09:05 PM
btw it is worth copyrighting as si cu lar med ia and most of he I ndi ans seem to be ignorant of these facts!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
CongressIN
Re: ok
by CongressIN on Mar 11, 2009 11:45 PM
vote support BJP.

defeat kangress.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Ashok panigrahi
Ashok: Democracy or Monarchy?
by Ashok panigrahi on Mar 11, 2009 08:55 PM  | Hide replies

Except the communist and BJP all other plitical prties are group of slaves faithful to a rich and powerful family without which they have no political existance. Thus the political powers are are concentrated in the hands of rich people/family which is the feudal/monarchial system of governace in the cyber age. So without crying on communalu/pseudocommunal lines please think seriously about the future of democracy in India. Reject the family rules to save the country from becoming the personal property of few families. Can you give some thought?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Unjinx
Re: Ashok: Democracy or Monarchy?
by Unjinx on Mar 11, 2009 08:58 PM
Become LKA's slave before it is too late

   Forward   |   Report abuse
New York
Indians should not TRUST Advani
by New York on Mar 11, 2009 08:53 PM  | Hide replies

* Advani has manipulated, USED and dumped RAMMANDIR.
* YOU and I are NOBODY for Advani and he will DUMP us in no-time.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Unjinx
Re: Indians should not TRUST Advani
by Unjinx on Mar 11, 2009 09:00 PM
Sitting in NY you are not able to understand the charisma of this heavenly person

   Forward   |   Report abuse
sudhakar sk
UNLESS YOU ARE COMMUNAL YOU CAN'T BE A BJP ASSOCIATE!.
by sudhakar sk on Mar 11, 2009 08:32 PM  | Hide replies


Navin Patnaik cannot shed now crocodile tear for the excessess he and his associates BJP has done in Orissa for the past two or more years.

He has to be thrown into Bay of Bengal alongwith his Safforonist Party for ever.

For over 11eleven year he did a bad to very bad Odissi alongwith Fake Hindutavawadi and looted Orissa.

Now they are finding fault with BJP is most foolish excuse.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
adguru
Re: UNLESS YOU ARE COMMUNAL YOU CAN'T BE A BJP ASSOCIATE!.
by adguru on Mar 11, 2009 08:53 PM
When M an mo han says "m in0 rit ies

   Forward   |   Report abuse
chotelal
Re: UNLESS YOU ARE COMMUNAL YOU CAN'T BE A BJP ASSOCIATE!.
by chotelal on Mar 11, 2009 08:45 PM
That is so called "Secularism" .. If Sonia Gandhi's Personal Secretary is Vincent George(Xtian), 3 most trusted political advisers are Ambika Soni(Xtian), Margaret Alwa(Xtian) and A K Anthony (XTian) then it is secularism .. but others are always communal ... Why is that all the trusted advisers of Sonia(Xtian) are Xtians? This really is very bad deed by Sonia and it smells of communality ..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
adguru
Re: Re: UNLESS YOU ARE COMMUNAL YOU CAN'T BE A BJP ASSOCIATE!.
by adguru on Mar 11, 2009 08:48 PM
very well said! actually these sic ulars mean "n0n o mmu nal = H! nd u bashing"

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
adguru
Re: UNLESS YOU ARE COMMUNAL YOU CAN'T BE A BJP ASSOCIATE!.
by adguru on Mar 11, 2009 08:54 PM
When M an mo han says "my n0 r it ie$

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sravan Rapol
Re: UNLESS YOU ARE COMMUNAL YOU CAN'T BE A BJP ASSOCIATE!.
by Sravan Rapol on Mar 11, 2009 08:54 PM
Why dont you join them.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
adguru
Re: UNLESS YOU ARE COMMUNAL YOU CAN'T BE A BJP ASSOCIATE!.
by adguru on Mar 11, 2009 08:40 PM
ur definition of 'non-communal'= "bash H!ndus and praise min0rity"?

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Unjinx
Re: UNLESS YOU ARE COMMUNAL YOU CAN'T BE A BJP ASSOCIATE!.
by Unjinx on Mar 11, 2009 08:44 PM
Advani is the 10th avatar of Vishnu

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Unjinx
Re: Re: UNLESS YOU ARE COMMUNAL YOU CAN'T BE A BJP ASSOCIATE!.
by Unjinx on Mar 11, 2009 08:45 PM
Nostradamus predicted that LKA would rule India for 492 years

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Unjinx
Re: Re: Re: UNLESS YOU ARE COMMUNAL YOU CAN'T BE A BJP ASSOCIATE
by Unjinx on Mar 11, 2009 08:57 PM
LKA will bring the whole world within Bha*ratVar*sh by 2082 -- it will be a land of milk and honey

   Forward   |   Report abuse
chotelal
Re: Re: Re: UNLESS YOU ARE COMMUNAL YOU CAN'T BE A BJP ASSOCIATE
by chotelal on Mar 11, 2009 08:51 PM
ha ha ha That's funny !!!

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
bob mathews
Re: Re: Re: UNLESS YOU ARE COMMUNAL YOU CAN'T BE A BJP ASSOCIATE
by bob mathews on Mar 11, 2009 08:48 PM
What a a joke!!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sravan Rapol
Re: Re: Re: Re: UNLESS YOU ARE COMMUNAL YOU CAN'T BE A BJP ASSOC
by Sravan Rapol on Mar 11, 2009 08:56 PM
A joke that bashed bob's "box"

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Unjinx
Re: Re: Re: Re: UNLESS YOU ARE COMMUNAL YOU CAN'T BE A BJP ASSOC
by Unjinx on Mar 11, 2009 08:53 PM
This is not a joke bob, I have read it

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
adguru
Re: UNLESS YOU ARE COMMUNAL YOU CAN'T BE A BJP ASSOCIATE!.
by adguru on Mar 11, 2009 08:55 PM
When M an mo han says m in0 rit ies particularly

   Forward   |   Report abuse
adguru
Re: UNLESS YOU ARE COMMUNAL YOU CAN'T BE A BJP ASSOCIATE!.
by adguru on Mar 11, 2009 08:41 PM
is that so?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
adguru
Re: UNLESS YOU ARE COMMUNAL YOU CAN'T BE A BJP ASSOCIATE!.
by adguru on Mar 11, 2009 08:42 PM
Your definition of 'non- co mm unal'= "bash H!n dus and praise min0 rity"?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
adguru
Re: UNLESS YOU ARE COMMUNAL YOU CAN'T BE A BJP ASSOCIATE!.
by adguru on Mar 11, 2009 08:55 PM
When M an mo han says "m

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Unjinx
Re: UNLESS YOU ARE COMMUNAL YOU CAN'T BE A BJP ASSOCIATE!.
by Unjinx on Mar 11, 2009 08:56 PM
LKA has been sent to bring the whole world under a common Bharat Varsh which he will achieve by the year 2082.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
deependra kamle
Re: UNLESS YOU ARE COMMUNAL YOU CAN'T BE A BJP ASSOCIATE!.
by deependra kamle on Mar 11, 2009 08:52 PM
go have a good sleep and then try to find difference between communal and your psudo secularisam

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
adguru
Re: UNLESS YOU ARE COMMUNAL YOU CAN'T BE A BJP ASSOCIATE!.
by adguru on Mar 11, 2009 08:55 PM
When M an mo han says its ok

   Forward   |   Report abuse
CongressIN
Re: UNLESS YOU ARE COMMUNAL YOU CAN'T BE A BJP ASSOCIATE!.
by CongressIN on Mar 11, 2009 08:45 PM
Kangress is the biggest communal party, which divides the people by religions, castes, creeds for their vote banks.

Congress allies Muslim Leagues of Kerala, Muslim party of Hederabad, Seperatists muslims party in Assam, and list goes on.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
adguru
Re: UNLESS YOU ARE COMMUNAL YOU CAN'T BE A BJP ASSOCIATE!.
by adguru on Mar 11, 2009 08:53 PM
When M an mo han says

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
sudhakar sk
UNLESS YOU ARE COMMUNAL YOU CAN'T BE A BJP ASSOCIATE!.
by sudhakar sk on Mar 11, 2009 08:32 PM  | Hide replies


Navin Patnaik cannot shed now crocodile tear for the excessess he and his associates BJP has done in Orissa for the past two or more years.

He has to be thrown into Bay of Bengal alongwith his Safforonist Party for ever.

For over 11eleven year he did a bad to very bad Odissi alongwith Fake Hindutavawadi and looted Orissa.

Now they are finding fault with BJP is most foolish excuse.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
adguru
Re: UNLESS YOU ARE COMMUNAL YOU CAN'T BE A BJP ASSOCIATE!.
by adguru on Mar 11, 2009 08:42 PM
Your definition of 'non- co mm unal'= "bash H!n dus and praise min0 rity"?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
drax
Re: UNLESS YOU ARE COMMUNAL YOU CAN'T BE A BJP ASSOCIATE!.
by drax on Mar 11, 2009 08:35 PM
Dont worry they will rejoin after polls. Then Con-party will be thrown into the bay.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
adguru
sicular media...
by adguru on Mar 11, 2009 08:31 PM  | Hide replies

praise Patnaik and bash BJP! Only few days back media was speaking against Patnaik.. SHAME!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
CongressIN
Re: sicular media...
by CongressIN on Mar 11, 2009 08:46 PM
Patanaik bon gaya sick ular, so englisn sick media glorifying him.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 209 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >
Write a message