Re: Re: Re: EVIL vs GOD
by Hari Manchandani on Jan 09, 2009 08:00 PM
the left govt has reduced poverty from 57% to 21% in 35 years as per a world bank report. Real enemy of Bengal are those Bhadraloks who enjoy every benefit of industry but wants a farmer's son to remain farmer.
Re: Re: Re: Re: EVIL vs GOD
by deepak on Jan 09, 2009 08:33 PM
BJP has the largest union in whole of India. CITU is not even close... India has always been Jai Jawan and Jai Kissan.. We do not need the BS coming out of filthy mouths of CPM supporters... You do not speak for farmers, you speak for an ideology. We were glad to kick you out of PUNJAB when you seemingly had some success in other states.
Re: Re: Well done Mamtaji
by deepak on Jan 09, 2009 08:35 PM
in destruction of CPM.. Bengal should rise from the ashes. If it takes bit destruction in Bengal, the premise is welcome. Plus, CPM is not alien to destruction. They destroyed much in Bengal.
Re: Re: CONGRATULATIONS TO PEOPLE OF NANDIGRAM & SINGUR!
by Don Kernash on Jan 09, 2009 06:01 PM
your moron, Singur and West Bengal wont see a penny of investment coming their way due to unfortunate exit of TATA's you communists will remain pro-China and Anti-India always bl00dy a55holes
Re: CONGRATULATIONS TO PEOPLE OF NANDIGRAM & SINGUR!
by Prakashan Valappil on Jan 09, 2009 06:04 PM
Dear Mohan, Ratan Tata is not a land grabber. You don't know the work culture of Tatas and how they care their employees. You go and see Jamshedpur what Tatas has done to that area and the development taken place. Don't mix up with Tatas and the dirty politics. You are ignorant about Tatas. Ratan Tata is a noble personality.
Re: Re: CONGRATULATIONS TO PEOPLE OF NANDIGRAM & SINGUR!
by K Mohanan on Jan 09, 2009 06:36 PM
If any industrialist wants to set up an industry he should by the land by giving appropriate compensation and not with the support of Goondas.
Re: Re: CONGRATULATIONS TO PEOPLE OF NANDIGRAM & SINGUR!
by Ananda Raj on Jan 09, 2009 07:49 PM
Jamshedji had vision for industry. Ratan has vision on money only. Comparing is insult for its founder.
Re: Re: CONGRATULATIONS TO PEOPLE OF NANDIGRAM & SINGUR!
by K Mohanan on Jan 09, 2009 06:27 PM
I was in Jamshedpur for more than three years and I stand by my statement that Ratan Tata is a Land Grabber.
Re: Re: Re: CONGRATULATIONS TO PEOPLE OF NANDIGRAM & SINGUR!
by sumit mukherjee on Jan 10, 2009 10:13 AM
Yeah, sure! You went to Jamshedpur and suddenly you became an expert on Ratan Tata and land grabbing. You're a funny man.
Re: CONGRATULATIONS TO PEOPLE OF NANDIGRAM & SINGUR!
by sumit mukherjee on Jan 09, 2009 06:02 PM
A little knowledge is dangerous. Tatas had nothing to do with Nandigram, Mr. Mohanan. Please refrain from commenting on matters which you are not aware of. If, losing a panchayat poll is an indicator for resignation of a CM, then all the CM's of all states should resign and we can be officially designated a "banana" republic. Of course, you could lead the race to be the top banana grabber.
Re: Re: CONGRATULATIONS TO PEOPLE OF NANDIGRAM & SINGUR!
by K Mohanan on Jan 09, 2009 06:38 PM
Mr. Mukherjee, The election result is the repercussion of Nandigram and Singur and not only that of Nandigram.
Re: Re: Re: CONGRATULATIONS TO PEOPLE OF NANDIGRAM & SINGUR!
by sumit mukherjee on Jan 10, 2009 10:15 AM
The Nandigram people have no clue what is Singur or where it is located or who the Tata's are. They have voted against the communists to protest against their atrocities. If your logic were true, CPM would have lost the Para election too. But they did not. They won with a large majority. The electorate wants fair representatives and in Nandigram, that's what they have chosen.
Re: Re: Re: CONGRATULATIONS TO PEOPLE OF NANDIGRAM & SINGUR!
by Hari Manchandani on Jan 09, 2009 08:02 PM
Mr Mohanan, You are wrong.It has nothing to do with Singur. Driving away industry to Gujarat is bad politics thats the aim of mamata
Re: CONGRATULATIONS TO PEOPLE OF NANDIGRAM & SINGUR!
by ramoo prasad on Jan 09, 2009 06:01 PM
I thank you for your comments but it will be struck off the site very soon.
Nandigram has gone back to 19th century where son of a farmer will remain farmer toiling hard in a saline mono-crop land. And, brother of Mamta will enjoy the fruits of industrial society by becoming a lead contractor of kolkata. great...thats how bengal will develop.
Re: Back to 19th century
by Sudhakar on Jan 09, 2009 06:14 PM
Mamta is the worst thing to happen to India since independence, she has singlehandedly put WB behind by atleast 20 yrs. When all the country is marching ahead the log-headed mamta and her monkeys will be hunting in the jungles and field of Nandigram
Re: Re: Back to 19th century
by Superman on Jan 09, 2009 06:24 PM
The hunting ground was prepared by Jyoti Basu....the greatest caveman of all time....
Re: Back to 19th century
by Superman on Jan 09, 2009 06:01 PM
You concern about bengal? Then take away all the commies to Gujarat.....What farmer's son will do will be decided by the farmer...not by the party.....
Mamata's brother will become lead contractor does not mean that you will allow Jyoti Basu's son to become landgrabbing crocodile.....
If you love Bengal, throw away these two very different commie ideologies of Mamata and Basu....
CPM led LF is 230 in 294 member assembly...end of Left in WB...must be joking? Nandigram has never been a red bastion...in fact it had limited left presence during '80s & '90s. In fact, Left has increased his margin in Para assembly bye-lection at Purulia
Re: What a great fuss?
by Superman on Jan 09, 2009 06:03 PM
Blatant lie.....Nandigram was always been a left bastion after 1977.....
Fidel castro also wins 99% of votes...Saddam Hussein used to win that amount of vote...by? bribing ppl like you....petrifying common people and looting votes....
Re: Re: Re: What a great fuss?
by Superman on Jan 09, 2009 06:22 PM
Everytime CPM has won before the Nandigram massacre.....You dont know...thats not anybody's problem....
Re: Re: Re: Re: What a great fuss?
by sumit mukherjee on Jan 09, 2009 06:27 PM
I know, because i checked the data. You don't know. That's why you are making such comments.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What a great fuss?
by Superman on Jan 09, 2009 08:01 PM
It seems your family is engaged in fabricating data for CPM....those are not the real ones....Go to the election commision....
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What a great fuss?
by sumit mukherjee on Jan 10, 2009 10:20 AM
@Superman: The difference between a civilised human being and a trinamool supporter is that we do not resort to abusive language or defiling objects or people in order to make our point. But whenever a trinamool supporter is presented factual data, he resorts to abuses and calling names. First learn your manners.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What a great fuss?
by Hari Manchandani on Jan 09, 2009 08:04 PM
In last 5 assembly election, left won 3 times & anti-left 2 times...I have just checked...it is not a left bastion
Re: What a great fuss?
by sumit mukherjee on Jan 09, 2009 05:52 PM
Good point made. Though, one wishes that we had a decent opposition in place. That way, the leftists would be less arrogant.
Re: Re: What a great fuss?
by K Mohanan on Jan 09, 2009 05:55 PM
The 294 seats they have won by Booth Capturing, Intimidation etc. etc. But remember this election is going to be beginning of the end of the corrupt CPIM rule.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What a great fuss?
by sumit mukherjee on Jan 09, 2009 06:13 PM
I was referring to the 2006 elections. Obviously, you are not aware of that. Didn't vote, did you?
Re: Re: Re: Re: What a great fuss?
by Shyam Mohan on Jan 09, 2009 06:10 PM
in the polloing boothyou can still rig comfortably with the help of compliant booth officers
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What a great fuss?
by sumit mukherjee on Jan 09, 2009 06:17 PM
That can be done by TMC also. Are you saying they are holier than others?
Re: Re: Re: Re: What a great fuss?
by Sam Nath on Jan 09, 2009 10:09 PM
Mr. Sumit, Your last name seems to me that you are a respected Brahmin who believes in GOD. How come you are with side with Godless party as Commies. First change your last name, you opportunist, then talk.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What a great fuss?
by sumit mukherjee on Jan 10, 2009 10:26 AM
Mr.Nath, I am a brahmin and a god fearing one at that. My posts are not in support of CPM, but against Mamata Banerjee and her brand of petty politics. Please do not advise me on what to do with my name. At least i do no suffer from an identity crisis of having a christian name with a indian surname. Btw, how does one become an opportunist by presening facts? I know most trinamool supporters are not very bright, but this is quite ridiculous.
Re: Re: Re: What a great fuss?
by Ind Boy on Jan 09, 2009 06:00 PM
This is absolutely incorrect, People of west bengal know that, I am sure u didn't vote in the last election
Re: Re: Re: Re: What a great fuss?
by Superman on Jan 09, 2009 06:05 PM
Do not talk about "people"...What people want you are not an expert of that.....But what people do not want now I am an expert of that....
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What a great fuss?
by sumit mukherjee on Jan 09, 2009 06:14 PM
yeah right! you're an expert. a person who doesn't even have the courage to share his true identity is an expert!
Re: Nandigram
by Saibal Roy on Jan 09, 2009 06:04 PM
Cheer up buddy i am with you.rightly said we are all with you.You have rightly mentioned.what we believe.Thanx And REgards.
Re: Re: Nandigram
by JIBAN NATH on Jan 09, 2009 06:36 PM
NOW EVERYONE UNDERSTAND THE MEANING OF "DHEKHUN KBAHUN AGIYE CHALUN" I.E. WHO WILL GET THE JOB, BUILT THE FLAT, BONO BITAN - SWIMMING POOL FOR WHOM AND INDEED NANO.
NOW EVERYONE WELL UNDERSTAND THAT YOU HAD GRABBED ALL SERVICES,PRIVATE PUBLIC, LAND, BUSINESS, FLATS, POOR FARMERS LAND. NOW WE WILL NOT GIVE ANYTHING MORE.
YOU HAD SNATCHED ALL THE POOR FARMERS LAND ILLEGALLY NOT EVEN PAID THEM THE COST TO THE POOR FARMERS I.E. THE MIRZAFAR SOMNATH CHATTERJEE, BAKRESWAR ETC.
NOTE THAT WE WILL NOT GIVE YOU ANY MORE LAND AND FOOD AND POINT OUT THE INTUDER OF POST 1971.
Re: Nandigram
by Superman on Jan 09, 2009 06:11 PM
She wont if she goes with Congress....In Kolkata and around, CPM wont win a single seat in that case....
Re: Re: Nandigram
by sumit mukherjee on Jan 09, 2009 05:47 PM
Did he mention the commies at all? Just because someone opines that Nandigram ppl made a mistake, he becomes a supporter of commies? Are you a supporter of TMC? Do you support Mamata's agitation to retain 2-stroke autos in Kolkata and increase air and noise pollution levels? Do you support her decision to destroy the industrialisation process in Bengal? If you do, i have nothing to say to you. If you don't, think through.
Re: Re: Re: Nandigram
by ramoo prasad on Jan 09, 2009 06:13 PM
yes we support her. if you do not support her agitation then why is the government not taking action against the Autos??? Commies are rapists [ 2000 women raped in Nandigram as reported by FIYAN ] and the most corrupt party in India.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Nandigram
by sumit mukherjee on Jan 09, 2009 06:19 PM
you are nuts! there is no such report. if there was, the media would have gone crazy with it. of course you support her! any person who can spread misinformation in a public forum has to be a leading Trinafool supporter.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Nandigram
by sumit mukherjee on Jan 10, 2009 10:29 AM
Mr. Nath, Please do take the time to go through all my posts. I have always voiced my protest against all atrocities. Of course, you wouldn't take the time to do that. You are very much like your fearless leader of the (m)asses. Scream, shout and try to dominate by dragging irrelevant topics into the board.
Re: Re: Re: Nandigram
by JIBAN NATH on Jan 10, 2009 11:59 AM
U UNDERSTAND THAT THERE IS NO CPM; IT IS B'DESH PARTY OF YR & WHO GRAB LAND ILLEGALLY FROM THE POOR FARMERS, GRAB ALL SERVICES 420 WAY, MAKE CALCUTTA A BOTHEL (BONO BITAN, KARO BITAN) ETC., NOW IT IS ALL OPEN TO WB PEOPLE. WE WILL NOT PROVIDE YOU ANY MORE LAND FOOD.
WE WL TRACE OUT POST 1971 INTUTION N RUSTICATE TO THE SEA.
Re: Re: Nandigram
by gurugobinda kower on Jan 09, 2009 06:05 PM
My dear VAN...RAM, Do you know , who raped a little girl Sunita Mondal in Nandigram? Who marder one innocent police man named sadhucharan? You don't know this. This is not your fault. It is the media who didn't circulate it widely. For your kind information in Nandigram 39 numbers of left party supporter were killed whereas 23 numbers of trinamul or oter supporter were killed including 14th March incident. Again in 14th March 8people were killed by police firing but 6 people killed by some other means. HOW MAN? HOW IS IT POSSIBLE? Ask the media, they will keep mum.
Re: Re: Re: Nandigram
by Superman on Jan 09, 2009 06:16 PM
The people of Nandigram have given the answer.....All these Sadhucharan, Sunitas were part of the CPM oppressor force....You know one person named Che Guevara...he was very much in favor of liquidating the oppressors....
Re: Re: Re: Re: Nandigram
by sumit mukherjee on Jan 09, 2009 06:24 PM
Oh great logic! You give the example of a celebrated leftist to support trinamool's antics. you're surely superman! of course the word "comical" is missing in the middle.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Nandigram
by Superman on Jan 09, 2009 08:05 PM
Mamata is also a leftist..On the other hand CPM is olygarchic....and Che Guevara is not anybody's property....I am not a Che supporter..but I am giving you his lessons whom you long forgot........
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Nandigram
by sumit mukherjee on Jan 10, 2009 10:30 AM
How can i forget Che Guevera when i never knew him in the first place? You have to know someone first to forget.
Re: Re: Nandigram
by sumit mukherjee on Jan 09, 2009 05:54 PM
Mamata winning the assembly polls would be a disaster for Bengal. It will be a case of "from the frying pan to the fire". She will destroy anything that is left and drive the state back to the stone age with her stupidity!
Re: Re: Re: Nandigram
by Sam Nath on Jan 09, 2009 10:20 PM
Mr. Sumit, What is left in Bengal, can you tell me. Can you tell me why are you carrying your last name and supporting godless communist. That shows your duplicity mind.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Nandigram
by sumit mukherjee on Jan 10, 2009 10:39 AM
Whatever is left in Bengal is surely going to be destroyed if TMC comes to power. Mamata herself is not corrupt. I am pretty sure that she does not take bribes or undue favours. That's why she still does not have assets worth crores. I respect her integrity. But a majority of the rest of the TMC leadership is corrupt and opportunistic. They will eat away everything that is left and then sell the leftovers.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Nandigram
by sumit mukherjee on Jan 10, 2009 12:59 PM
Btw, the word you are looking for is "duplicitious", which essentially means subterfuge.
Re: Re: Re: Nandigram
by prasun pradhan on Jan 09, 2009 06:28 PM
ohh, really? Last 35 yrs u have seen left govt to do, u can predict next. In all aspects we r in lower listed. u do not see any change, how do u predict her? Please let me know what r the rest things to be destroy in west bengal? For ur kind information I remind u that india specially west bengal is the cheapest country and state respectively. U should know the cause, our economy is agriculture depended close economy.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Nandigram
by sumit mukherjee on Jan 09, 2009 06:31 PM
a person who does not follow court orders, breaks the law regularly, harasses the common people with frequent bandhs, demonstrations and riot acts, is nothing but a hooligan. i know what she is, it's time educated ppl like you understood it too.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Nandigram
by sumit mukherjee on Jan 10, 2009 10:35 AM
@Sam Nath: I don't know what is your problem with me being a brahmin. Honestly, your constant posts based on caste are a true indication of how biased you are. Since you are incapable of understanding, it seems like a futile effort to write against your post, but nonetheless... Read my posts again. I stand firm on my ground. The left has to go and so does Mamata. Elect a govt. of independents or don't elect anyone and have President's rule! The current band of politicians do not deserve to be elected.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Nandigram
by sumit mukherjee on Jan 10, 2009 10:32 AM
@superman: so because someone does the worng thing and succeeds, everyone else also must continue to do the wrong thing? is that a valid debate?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Nandigram
by Superman on Jan 09, 2009 08:06 PM
CPM taught everybody to do these...Mamata is the first lady of a Leftist generation...
Re: Re: Re: Nandigram
by JIBAN NATH on Jan 09, 2009 06:30 PM
NOW EVERYONE UNDERSTAND THE MEANING OF "DHEKHUN KBAHUN AGIYE CHALUN" I.E. WHO WILL GET THE JOB, BUILT THE FLAT, BONO BITAN - SWIMMING POOL FOR WHOM AND INDEED NANO.
YOU HAD GRAB ALL THE POOR FARMERS LAND ILLEGALLY NOT EVEN PAID THE COST TO THE THEM LIKE MIRZAFAR SOMNATH CHATTERJEE, BAKRESWAR ETC.
NOTE THAT WE WILL NOT GIVE YOU ANY MORE LAND FOOD AND POINT OUT THE INTUDER OF POST 1971.
Re: Re: Re: Nandigram
by Superman on Jan 09, 2009 06:12 PM
What left in bengal is stone.....Bengal is already in stone age after 40 years of left rule and 50 years of Left nuisance...
Re: RED is dangarous-Women are proud with Mamata
by Saibal Roy on Jan 09, 2009 06:02 PM
Dear Mr. Using harsh language,will make thing more harsh.So please use it more sensebly.Your comment should not heart other's.Please stop using RED colours from 2 day but not the RED party's
Re: Re: RED is dangarous-Women are proud with Mamata
by Partha Banerjee on Jan 09, 2009 06:15 PM
What Mamata has done for the people of Bengal is, she scared off Jyoti Basu from election, the man under whose leadership Bengal fell from 2nd state of India to 18th (or maybe lower). People of Bengal shd be ever grateful for that.
Re: RED is dangarous-Women are proud with Mamata
by sumit mukherjee on Jan 09, 2009 05:41 PM
Mamata has done nothing noteworthy for the ppl. Trinamool won because ppl voted against the communists, not because they chose TMC. If Congress had a decent leader in Bengal, they could have won teh seat.
Re: Re: RED is dangarous-Women are proud with Mamata
by Tinku Baidya on Jan 09, 2009 06:13 PM
HOW MAMATA CAN DO FOR BENGAL? SHE IS OR WAS NOT IN POWER IN BENGAL ANYTIME.
LEFT DOGS HAS FINISHED THE BENGAL SINCE LAST 30 YEARS.
Re: Re: Re: RED is dangarous-Women are proud with Mamata
by sumit mukherjee on Jan 09, 2009 06:25 PM
Please don't type in CAPS. It looks odd and is difficult to read. She is a sitting MP and never attends Parliament. What more can you say about her responsiblities?
