Mamata Banerjee is in trouble after winning the Nandigram by Election. Beacause her only motive to create violance through out the State, not any type of Development.So she has to do something for the Nandigram people....is it possible....this result will not effect in Loksabha Election.
Re: MAMATA in trouble after winning the Nandigram Election
by Vikas on Jan 09, 2009 01:29 PM
ranajit datta, u hv a very funny crazy imagination. i'm totally confused
Re: Re: MAMATA in trouble after winning the Nandigram Election
by sumit mukherjee on Jan 09, 2009 03:32 PM
trinamool cupporters are always confused. ranajit is correct. mamata is a destroyer, she is incapable of development.
Re: Re: MAMATA in trouble after winning the Nandigram Election
by pradeep sharma on Jan 09, 2009 01:50 PM
Terebaap is typical TMC cadre. The quality of response shows that.
Re: Re: Re: MAMATA in trouble after winning the Nandigram Electio
by Sam Nath on Jan 09, 2009 10:42 PM
At least he is not a supporter of a mass murderer group, ie. commies
Re: Re: Re: MAMATA in trouble after winning the Nandigram Electio
by ranajit datta on Jan 09, 2009 02:54 PM
Natural thing ...TMC suppoter er theke er theke besi kichu expect kara jai na..after Wining the Election...ha hahh ahhah..
Re: Devil and the Shaitan
by Ind Boy on Jan 09, 2009 05:52 PM
CPM is corrupted, but Trinamul is virus. Mamata is mentally unstable, jalous, mad woman. After the success of Nandigram she will cause more trouble
Re: Re: Devil and the Shaitan
by sumit mukherjee on Jan 09, 2009 03:35 PM
both are the same, but you wouldn't understand that really. trinamool supporters are trinamool supporters because they don't have any brains!
i feel sad for the people.... commies were anti development....mamta overtook them not by being better but by being worse and moving further back into time... and these people have no choice & in fact doesn't even understand the bigger game!
Re: Re: sad
by sumit mukherjee on Jan 09, 2009 03:36 PM
This is the same line which you have kept repeating throughout the board. Did Mamata did teach you this line today?
If common people can vote by tight security by para military, CPM will WASH OUT from WEST BENGAL. In NANDIGRAM, CPM cannot do MACHINERY REGEEING and CUST DUMMY VOTE, that why they washout.
This result will partially reflect in Lok Shaba election on May 2009.
Re: CPM WASHOUT FROM NANDIGRAM
by Subhabrata Roy on Jan 09, 2009 01:10 PM
Dear Gautam 2006 assemble elections were held under security of paramilitary forces.. Who lost??
Left has lost 15 out of 16 panchayet seats because of their high handed attitude and hooliganism propagated by laxman seth.. Those guys who were in CPIM are now in TMC.. abu sufyan, ali sardar they were in CPIM 2 years ago and were part of Laxman seth's hooligans.. now they have switched sides.. Its like we the people have to tolerate either a thief or a decoit.. basically we are left out of any options..
Re: Re: CPM WASHOUT FROM NANDIGRAM
by Vikas on Jan 09, 2009 01:22 PM
CPM started killing poor farmers and grabbing land after 2006 assemble elections. This time CPM will be defeated.
Re: CPM WASHOUT FROM NANDIGRAM
by Ind Boy on Jan 09, 2009 05:57 PM
I remember the last election, there was more paramilitary forces than the voters in a ploing booth, Everybody even the CPM leaders thought they would wahsed out. But the the voters decided to washout mamata.
Re: Re: Re: CPM WASHOUT FROM NANDIGRAM
by madhav gokhale on Jan 09, 2009 01:24 PM
For a Bengali , Gautam Biswsas has written exceptionally correct English prose. They say in Bengal there are Banerjees , Mukherjees and Charterjees but not anyone with Energee(pun intended)
Re: Re: Re: Re: CPM WASHOUT FROM NANDIGRAM
by sumit mukherjee on Jan 09, 2009 04:19 PM
Mr. Gokhale, Some ppl are not privileged enough to get educated in english medium schools like you did. Does not mean that you are superior to them in any manner. As far the knowledge of the English language is concerned, it is not a regional matter, but a matter of education as i have stated earlier. Maybe Mr. Biswas is weak in his command over the language, but it does not give you the right to make fun of him. Moreover, in doing so, you are clearly demonstrating your regional bias and lack of civility. Shameful behaviour. You may be literate, Mr. Gokhale, but you certainly have not received education.
Mamta won or CPI lost perhaps the second one is more true and Karat and Bardhan have made CPI just notacceptable tp young minds. Buddha has been trying to move with generation but Karat and Baradhan have got nothing to do wit Indians and india they are on a seperate misson all together. Does this speaks what is to follow? If not YES then certainly answer is not NO. The fort is begining to collapse WB may be gone and Kerala can not sustain the COMMI any further.Karat is busy making third front having lost on all fronts.
Re: Re: Re: Mamta
by Sandeep Mitra on Jan 09, 2009 01:06 PM
gautam , we are also from bengal . if this lady creates so much terror sitting in opposition , we can better understand , what she will do if voted to power . so request you not to talk nonsense
Re: Re: Mamta
by SUSIKTA CHAUDHURI on Jan 09, 2009 01:19 PM
Rajesh may i know which stare u belongs to? Pls don't say anything withing know about CPIM. Just want to say a small thing the TMC will never ever able to come to power. Coz we all know she do, wht she does and wht she will do...
Do you think Mamata and his Trinamul is psychologically stable? Go back look at the work done, decission made by Ms Mamata. Do you really think She can run a state?
It would be a bad dream if you want Mamata as WB CM in next pool. To lead a state you need to be more stable. Your statement, vision should be backed by proper logic. I am anti CPM is not enough quality to become a CM.
TC fight against industry when Left in WB trying for Industry. Do you think TC's vision is backed by stable people? No need to write more here because it doesn't reach to people in Nadigram. Have fun with Mamata & het TC.
Re: Re: Trinamul is leaded by psychologically unstable political
by pradeep sharma on Jan 09, 2009 01:42 PM
Comparing an illiterate, uneducated lady with an intellectual?
