May I request UPA and Headless chicken Left allies to stop these tamasha? It is being noticed and watched by world's leading countries. Everybody laughts at you dear Headless Chickens! Why don't you make a playground rather than making trouble at Lok Sabha? I guess Mannu bhaiya and Soni-ji will be very happy to have a football tournament among the members of UPA-Left-DMK stupids!
IT IS REALLY UNFORTUNATE OF BEING AN INDIAN TO WATCH THE TRAGEDY OF KULAKS POLITICIANS! WE WANT TO SEE THAT INDIA IS SHINING, WE DON'T WANT TO SEE ANY POLITICIAN'S PERSONAL BENEFIT. IF YOU STUPID HEADLESS POLITICIANS FAIL TO KEEP CITIZENS PEACEFUL, PLEASE LEAVE FROM YOUR MP, MLA POSTS! PEOPLE OF INDIA WILL ARRANGE FOR A BETTER PERSON WHO WILL LOOK AFTER THEM.
CALL BACK POLICY FOR MPs, MLAs must be there in the Constitution to prevent CORRUPTED POLITICIANS making money out of the Tax of Indian citizens! And this will enable the country free from THE TAMASHAs CURRENTLY BEING HELD BY UPA-LEFT-DMK.
RE:Headless Chickens of India: Please stop these tamasha! World is laughing at you!
by mailme alladin on Jun 24, 2008 09:41 PM
When Left opposes the deal, they are headless chicken. When BJP opposes the same deal, it is in the interest of the nation.
RE:Headless Chickens of India: Please stop these tamasha! World is laughing at you!
by All Right on Jun 25, 2008 07:22 AM
Correction - whole UPA is full of headless chickens...
Without any planning, any dialogue, any white flag towards opposition, they headlong dove into this international ruckus.
RE:Headless Chickens of India: Please stop these tamasha! World is laughing at you!
by Arijit on Jun 25, 2008 02:18 PM
You are poor Mailme Alladin! You don't know who was the first person to call politicians headless chicken! Mr. Ronen Sen. Search google and gain knowledge!! You seem to be a part of the great Indian TRAITOR--CPI/CPIM. Don't be a part of some idiots, Kulaks, Lumpen Proletariats, otherwise your brain will not be there to work (as it is in the present case)!! "GOOD BYE LENIN"!
Despite all protest and denials by Commies, Communism is rejected by Indians not just once but in 14 elections. From 1952 to 2004, Commies never managed to get more than 10% of votes in any elections.
RE:BITTER TRUTH ABOUT COMMUNISM IN INDIA..
by mailme alladin on Jun 24, 2008 09:49 PM
Commies are rejected by Indian! Absolutely. They ahve no power to decide the policy for India. Even then you are blaming commies for non development of India. Isn't it a ridiculous attempt to hide the failure of the past govts.
From the beginning there is no transparency in the deal.PM is not coming out with the facts. 1.BJP is opposing the deal in the present form. 2.Left is against the deal. 3.Major supporting party SP is against the deal. 4.Ultimately the well known scientific community which served DAE are also against the deal. Hence the Govt can have a debate formulate a consensus opinion on this and move forward. We cannot trust Congress.In the name of non alignment we were pushed into the hands of USSR which was detrimental to our growth, our army, and only helped commies. It is impossible to set the things in one stroke.Now we need to pay for the mistakes of Nehru and Congress.
Sir, To my recollection, the Left in India has said "YES" only to Chinese agression of 1962. To everything else, they may have said "NO". I remember they said "NO" to Indian Independence too. I hope to ask Mother Theresa's Order to start a "Mental Asylum" for our Leftists. It would be in Kolkotta - convenient for most of them na? If any of you think, another branch in Kerala would be better, please let me know. I will include that in my petition to the Order. If this does not work out, I am going to try another way.
I am in touch with the Russians to take them all out to Siberia for "re-education" in the Gulag Archipelago in the more modern versions of Marxism, such as "Euro-communism" and "Deng Hsio Peng's" communism.
The question is what to do with Pranab Mukherjee. No one wants him. Not the Russians - they say he is not a leftist, he is not a rightist, he is not "liberal", he is something called "na ithi, na ithi" or "neither here nor there, serious face without new ideas". So, we sent him to Australia. They do not want him there either. Even Beijing did not know who he was, until Sonia Gandhi phoned Wen Jiabao to say, Pranab is waiting at the airport. Therefore, in the UPA govt., you have so many "non-descript" people also. We have to build a special "Half-Way House" for them. They are not fully mad yet, until they sign the Indo-US Deal, that is.
I'm sick and tired of "tamasha" of these scums. Most of these "Chores" are worried about losing their power and thus losing their power to loot to this country. When you "Khichri" like this, every "Lulli Shulli" is super PM.
Here're some of the reasons described so far:
1. Communists thugs suggested SP not to support agreement because SP will lose anti-USA Musalmaan votes.
2. Thugs like Lalu, Paswan and lot of other Mom and Pops parties are not supporting the deal for loosing thier power if voting happens.
3. We all know Communists scums are opposing the deal due to thier ideology. That's is the only reason.
4. Congress is not going forward because of fear of loosing power.
Where's discussion of what's good for the country in their decision? Where's discussion of alternative for the good of country? Where's discussion of country nuclear plants just running of 50% of the capacity? Where's the discussion of energy need and gap existing and the future?
Do these scums even care? Here's my solution.
Gather all these thugs at one place. Blow the place by atomic bombs so that none of these low-lives lives another minute. I want to see pieces of these scums flying in the air. They deserve this as these scums are responsible for miserable life of billions of people.
The nuclear deal would bring thousands of crores for US companies and government.Left parties may be good for nothing. But on this issue, they are just right.When US is going to earn so much through tis deal, then why should we accept a term that US can stop supply of nuclear fuel on there will.Moerover, India has better record than US on non-proliferation.Then why should we enter into an agreement which puts us under their mercy.Its high time India recognises it's strength- Big Market and stand up to its stature to deal with US on equal grounds, not as a begger.They need us more than we do.
The most ludicrous rumour this weekend:the prime minister told the Congress boss that he would resign if he did not get his nuclear agreement with the US. It strains credibility because Manmohan Singh doesn't have the back bone to make such a threat.Also,the only person who might get scared by such a threat is not Sonia Gandhi,not Comrade Prakash Karat,but probably American President George W Bush. There was real drama in Delhi on Friday: the prime minister has cancelled all his appointments;he's not meeting anyone;he's gone underground.Bad news ahead, they said. He apparently had a bout of viral fever.Sounds like his resignation threat scared himself most of all.You would think that everyone would be bone-chillingly frightened by the prospect of the prime minister resigning and early elections. With inflation having gone into the stratosphere, there is only one vote that will be cast by the 300 million-strong electorate: the anti-incumbent vote.With the way the Left mishandled the protests in Singur & Nandigram, you think it more than anyone else would be terrified of facing the voters. Instead,the Left dares Manmohan to go ahead and make their day.Indeed, the comrades would go into martyr mode —they suspect the prime minister of being an American plant; witness the book A Prattler's Tale by former West Bengal Finance Minister Ashok Mitra,which says Manmohan was planted by the Americans as India's finance minister in 1991.
RE:Manmohan's dilemma
by hindhu communist on Jun 24, 2008 07:50 PM
The Left would see itself as the nation's saviour if it manages to weed out the plant, even at the cost of losing the seats it occupies in the current Parliament.It's certain that Sonia is worried about the disaster that early elections would be; that's why she has been busy making alternative arrangements to ensure the UPA continues till the last constitutionally allowed moment.Part of the arrangement is with the Samajwadi Party,with whom the Congress was warring till last year's assembly elections; a year later they have managed to let bygones be bygones.The deal for the SP's support has been worked out by SP chief Mulayam Singh's main lackey,Amar Singh. The contours are believed to be as follows:the SP will not allow the government to fall, and in return,the government will either dump or significantly dilute a Bill that is close to Sonia's heart —the Women's Reservation Bill.In addition,the SP will jettison an unsavoury businessman who is in a bit of a fix in UP these days. Helping to broker the deal was a young industrialist close to the party. The Left has obviously got wind of the deal, which is why they have threatened the SP with a pull-out from the Third Front if the SP bails the UPA out. This has not caused the SP any grief, which remembers how the Left continued to support the Congress despite the bad blood between the Congress and the SP in the final year of Mulayam's government.As far as the Third Front is concerned, its possibilities were in any case receding.
RE:RE:Manmohan's dilemma
by hindhu communist on Jun 24, 2008 07:55 PM
The other arrangement that Sonia and her political team are attempting is with the NDA. The Congress is not looking for support from the BJP, which has time and again said it opposed the deal in its present form. At the same time, however,prime ministerial candidate L.K. Advani has,of late,gone out of his way to mention that he was not opposed to a deal as such;his party claims credit for making the first move towards a strategic alliance with America.What this means, of course,is that there's nothing holding the Congress back from approaching some of the NDA's smaller partners. It appears that the Orissa chief minister, Naveen Patnaik, may play ball with the UPA if only to see the nuclear deal through;the TrinamoolCongress's Mamta Bannerjee is another possibility if it isolates the Marxists;and the Punjab chief minister,Parkash Singh Badal,is another person in favour of the nuclear deal with America.How these negotiations turn out is yet to be seen, but Sonia is obviously taking no chances, and knowing this, it would be utter stupidity for the prime minister to try emotional blackmail with her.And it would be completely out of character, for Manmohan Singh has not exhibited this kind of machismo at any point of his life. Besides,everything that he is at the moment,he owes to her.This is not to say that Sonia does not need Manmohan at all. As you would have noticed from our front page, the economy isn't doing too well,and Sonia wants elections deferred in the chance that thin
RE:RE:RE:Manmohan's dilemma
by hindhu communist on Jun 24, 2008 08:06 PM
This leaves us with just one conclusion: that the prime minister's threat is meant to scare the American president, George W Bush. If Manmohan is the 'American plant' as alleged by Ashok Mitra and coyly hinted at by Jaswant Singh, then what his quitting would mean is that the Americans would lose their highest-ranking mole ever (John le Carré, where are you?). But for some reason, it does not seem likely that even the Americans would get scared. India is one of only two countries where a majority has consistently rated the US favourably in the Pew Global Attitudes Project annual surveys. The US doesn't need a plant, or a mole.
As mentioned earlier, any talk of the prime minister threatening to resign is ludicrous. Any talk of him threatening anyone is laughable. Any talk of him actually resigning is welcome.
RE:Manmohan's dilemma
by Anand on Jun 24, 2008 09:07 PM
Reading an article is good.But you have reproduced word by word of sapan das gupta's article in Indian Express. Pls think independently, don't act like congresswalla's.Any way good article.Thanks for painstakingly typing all the contents
