RE:give me one good thing about hinduism
by Bharat on Aug 02, 2008 01:50 PM
Do you anything about your religion? any good thing forget about hindusim, tell about yours?
RE:give me one good thing about hinduism
by crazy funky on Aug 02, 2008 01:51 PM
if i tell good thing about my religion , i am afraid that you might abandon hinduism and embrace the religion i follow.
RE:RE:give me one good thing about hinduism
by Bharat on Aug 02, 2008 01:59 PM
So there is nothing. They made you fool...sorry...but life mai ek hi chance milta hai...Na tum ghar ke rahe na ghat ke..
RE:give me one good thing about hinduism
by Abhinav Bhatnagar on Aug 02, 2008 01:56 PM
For thousands of years, Hindus have allowed every religion in Bharat, tell me one other religion that is so tolerant.
RE:give me one good thing about hinduism
by crazy funky on Aug 02, 2008 02:02 PM
its not that they are tolerant . they are tolerant but they have to tolerate.
RE:RE:give me one good thing about hinduism
by crazy funky on Aug 02, 2008 01:25 PM
there is no first night in hinduism ..they even see mohurat(right time) for first night.
RE:give me one good thing about hinduism
by Ram Sharma on Aug 02, 2008 01:23 PM
But u want to blindly follow what was written in Bible thousands of yrs ago, when scientific knowledge was poor.
In Hinduism there is no such necesity. We hv lot of freedom and flexibility in the way we worship or believe.
Hinduism believes that there is god in even every electron, neutron etc., which make up the whole universe.
Why in this age of science u r so anti Hindu, which has given Yoga & fully phonetic scripts to the world?
RE:RE:give me one good thing about hinduism
by Ram Sharma on Aug 02, 2008 01:36 PM
U cannot understand what I hv written, bcz yr brain is full of anti Hindu venom.
As regards division, there r lot of divisions in Christianity & Islam also. That is the reason that Britain kept its hold while freeing Ireland, keeping north portion with itself, saying that the north is having majority of protestants as in Britain. Iran & Iraq faught with each other for many yrs due to Shia Sunni difference. Shia Sunni fight with each other all over the world, they bomb even Masjids for this work. there r many other divisions also. In India Christians & Muslims hv caste differences as well, though these religions r supposed to b casteless.
In this age of science do not differentiate based on religion. B rational and not blind Hindu hater. U r lucky to b in a Hindu majority country. Hindus believe in 'Sarve Bhavantu Sukhinah'. I hope u understand this brotherhood.
RE:give me one good thing about hinduism
by Ram Sharma on Aug 02, 2008 01:51 PM
Not only some Hindus, Christians & Muslims also kill fellow human beings. Why u Christians killed harmless people in Jaliyanwala Bag, why u christians bought and sold human beings like animals? Can u reply to these questions? Why devout Muslim Aurangjeb killed all his brothers?
Come out of anti Hindu syndrom and stop saying 'u kill people...'. I personally feel that we must love each human being, animal and plant for the better ecology.
RE:RE:give me one good thing about hinduism
by Ram Sharma on Aug 02, 2008 01:29 PM
Hindus r the most secular and peaceful people in the world. U r able to write anti Hindu hate message only bcz of this. It is not possible to do so against Muslims or Christian majority country, where fanatic Muslims or Christians will go after yr blood.
RE:RE:give me one good thing about hinduism
by Ram Sharma on Aug 02, 2008 01:42 PM
U r a fool to say that yr hindu brothers r doing toilet cleaning. My hindu, christian & muslim brothers r doing all types of work all over the world, incl toilet cleaning, scientist in Nasa, software engrs etc. Like u I do not demean any job. learn to respect dignity of job. I also do not keep track, if someone is doing toilet cleaning or something else. If u r doing toilet cleaning then also I would not consider a lowly person.
RE:RE:RE:give me one good thing about hinduism
by Bharat on Aug 02, 2008 01:57 PM
@crazy You hate people doing toilet cleaning and showing belongigness to dalits.
RE:RE:RE:give me one good thing about hinduism
by Ram Sharma on Aug 02, 2008 01:52 PM
Reply like this, when u don't hv any logic. Ur brain is full of venom and beyond repair.
RE:RE:RE:give me one good thing about hinduism
by crazy funky on Aug 02, 2008 01:44 PM
wow ...its strange to hear that you are calling muslims as brothers but not porkistani or bangladeshi. its strange to see that you are calling christians as brothers but not evanglist or converts.
it really doesnt suits you or any one from your religion. we stopped believing you guys who takes our support and trust to develop and later back stab us.
RE:RE:give me one good thing about hinduism
by Ram Sharma on Aug 02, 2008 01:39 PM
I had been to many developed countries many times.
Do u know that in Germany companies deduct Church charges from salaries of those Christians, who r members of Churches. Those who do not give this payment r denied many rights, even the right to bury dead ones.
RE:RE:RE:give me one good thing about hinduism
by crazy funky on Aug 02, 2008 01:43 PM
yeah we have seen that in GANESH CHANDA,DASERA CHANDA,HOLI CHANDA ...very much freedoms where goons comes to your house to demand money ,if not given then you and your family memebers are not safe to live their or do business.
RE:RE:RE:give me one good thing about hinduism
by Ram Sharma on Aug 02, 2008 01:54 PM
If some Hindu person dos something wrong, u cannot blame the religion for this. Bcz Hinduism does not say that u demand money for worshiping. Hinduism teaches 'Vasudev Kutumbakam'.
RE:kick all the hindus out of india
by Ram Sharma on Aug 02, 2008 01:14 PM
U want only Muslims & Christians in India. So bomb all Hindus and fulfil yr ambition.
RE:kick all the hindus out of india
by Ram Sharma on Aug 02, 2008 01:22 PM
U did not reply to my question and suggestion, just making a junk statement.
RE:kick all the hindus out of india
by crazy funky on Aug 02, 2008 01:27 PM
what ever other religion is ...we accept every one ...every one are welcomed in india but not fanatic hindus who are always against the development and ready for communal fights .
they have problems every where in india .
they fight in the name of religion,language,caste,region etc ...
give me one religion or region which is spared by hindus. they fight every where
RE:kick all the hindus out of india
by Bharat on Aug 02, 2008 01:47 PM
Good one, do they fight among themselves? Human is a born Hindu, after that only he forced to follow another religion.
That is why there is no forced convertion to hindusim.
RE:kick all the hindus out of india
by Ram Sharma on Aug 02, 2008 01:46 PM
U r blind not to understand that Hindus r the most secular & peaceful people in the world. Sometime back a learned and popular Muslim was our President, PM is a weak Sikh and Super PM is a Christian lady. But it is not an issue, bcz Hindus don't bother. Is it possible anywhere else in the world?
I can only say this and the people who support this govt included. Most ministers / MLA and supporters have a hindu leaning, and if they cant understand what harm their actions are doing in the long run for this nation then god save this nation. They all have blinders and cant see what the first family long term objective in destroying everything Indian and its culture. The nuclear deal is a sell off and will expose our ability to deal with external threat. Pak and China must be laughing their way to the bank as India is trapped and has no way out. We will now be under the IAEA but unofficially under the USA. I hope the next govt has the guts to recall the deal in a equal format rather than blame the last govt and accept the deal in its present format. Overall the hindus have to realize their worth and the games that the UPA is playing with them.
RE:Tell Me
by crazy funky on Aug 02, 2008 01:04 PM
you should ask hindus. they can answer it better as they get converted for everything. they can even get converted for US or UK work visa or nationality
RE:Tell Me
by Ram Sharma on Aug 02, 2008 01:19 PM
But u want to blindly follow what was written in Bible thousands of yrs ago, when scientific knowledge was poor.
In Hinduism there is no such necesity. We hv lot of freedom and flexibility in the way we worship or believe.
Hinduism believes that there is god in even every electron, neutron etc., which make up the whole universe.
RE:RE:RE:Tell Me
by Bharat on Aug 02, 2008 01:43 PM
@crazy Freedom ....hum...hum... What is freedom from life? Moksha..... And Moksha can be achived only through good deeds not by abusing.
RE:kick all religious fanatics out of india
by crazy funky on Aug 02, 2008 01:03 PM
yes . thats the miracle of GOD and people all around the world (including muslims and christians)believe it ...not just in india.
RE:kick all religious fanatics out of india
by galilio on Aug 02, 2008 01:14 PM
Crazy funky,you are a sinner becouse you are not born to a virgin mother.sinners have no place in india as this is punniabhumi.hence jesus will not come here to pick you up from punniabhumi.so judge yourself which country is suitable for meeting your god on judgementday.
RE:RE:kick all religious fanatics out of india
by crazy funky on Aug 02, 2008 01:16 PM
who said that only sinners born to non-virgin mother. who are you to declared that ..
it might be written in your geeta but not in bible nor in Quran.
infact you seems to be a paapi as your mother did not marry 5 husbands like dhropadhi and your YAMA or SHIVA will come to pick you up from this holy land called india.
RE:kick all religious fanatics out of india
by Mahesh on Aug 02, 2008 01:13 PM
There is no GOD. No religion and Chritianity is the biggest myth of all religion.
RE:kick all religious fanatics out of india
by crazy funky on Aug 02, 2008 01:14 PM
thats why it is the biggest and largest religion with billions of followers all over the world.
RE:kick all religious fanatics out of india
by Mahesh on Aug 02, 2008 01:21 PM
In all european countries and in USA hardly people come to church. Onky Evangelists like crazy funky talks about Jesus. See how his blood boils when I say about Jesus. This bugger is a paid Evangelist. His Job is to abuse Muslems and Hindus in the name of India. He is ready to demolish any dargah and temples on the road side. First let him demolish many small churches that have cropped up recently. We Hindus always believe that any small temple that causes trafiic must be demoished. But becoz of this people like crazy funk a paid agent of some bullshit countries (where they swap wives and daughters) take advantage and start trying to demolish traditionall temples.
Congress rule means dynastic rule. Except Shashtriji (who mysteriously died in Tashkent) & PVN Rao, the Congress rule has meant dynasty rule. Now, though MMS is the PM, he is PM without any real power. He is just dummy for Sonia. She has also appointed one of her sycophant as the President. Though Congress has only 145 / 545 Loksabha seats, Sonia is ruling like a one party rule by cobbling most opportunistic post poll alliances (now Left has left but SP has come to the rescue with bribing opposition MPs on a massive scale compared to PVN Rao).
RE:Dynastic rule
by Bharat on Aug 02, 2008 12:54 PM
Seems CRAZY FUNKY got he posting rights blocked. Kya tumare PAP KA GHADA BHAR GYA? Go to Mother-Marry-Sonia.
RE:Dynastic rule
by Avinash on Aug 02, 2008 02:46 PM
crazy funky, have you seen poor muslims lining up in front of darghas and even at some small hotels in Bhendi Bazar??? Or even heard of poor muslims in Hyderabad marrying off their minor daughters to toothless Arabs? That is due to poverty. Don't ridicule any one for that.
RE:Dynastic rule
by crazy funky on Aug 02, 2008 03:34 PM
no , i did not see any muslim marrying off their minor daughters to any toothless ARABS .but i have seen many bhramins forcing dalits to make their minor daughters a DEVADASI.
The project means HUGE MONEY to people like TR Baalu - that's why they are so keen on Setusamudram. We should not lose sight of this most important point.
Personally, I dont believe that Rama or Krishna are historical characters though I consider Mahabharata and Ramayana the greatest epics (even ahead of the Iliad / Odyssey) in the world and Rama epitomizes great qualities - love , strength, courage, righteousness, respect for elders ..!
For that matter it is my opinion that any historical person who claimed / claims that he had communicated with God / had a message from God is a LIAR!!!
RE:Missing the most important point
by Ramaswamy E on Aug 02, 2008 12:48 PM
Correction: any historical person who claimed / claims that he had communicated with God / had a message from God is a LIAR OR suffered from some illusion / hallucination / other mental disorder!!!
RE:Missing the most important point
by Bharat on Aug 02, 2008 12:51 PM
GOD Faith, Nation Development are two different things but runs together. People has to balance both properly.
RE:A message to all HINDUS from all indians
by Ahambrahmaasmi on Aug 02, 2008 01:01 PM
GREAT BHARAT IS FOR HINDUS AND NOT FOR SEMETICS SO FOLLOW THE RULE OF DHARMA AND NOT SEMETIC RULE.
RE:A message to all HINDUS from all indians
by Bharat on Aug 02, 2008 12:31 PM
Talk of yourself man not all Indians. Not a single Leader of present days dare to talk on behalf of whole India.
RE:A message to all HINDUS from all indians
by Bharat on Aug 02, 2008 12:35 PM
SO you are nither of them (PAKI-Indian, Chini-Indian, ALQaeda-Indian, SIMI-Indian)
RE:A message to all HINDUS from all indians
by sudhir kumar on Aug 02, 2008 12:35 PM
You are not the only indian.You doesn't matter anywhere.Barking will not help
It is greatly perplexing to think some army would choose to build a bridge that may take sevaral years to cross the shallow sea , as deep as 3 ft to 12 ft throughout the 30 kilometer span.
Any army with the least common sense would have built ships, probably not as complex as ocean going ships as they are not nessasary as the waters here are vey shallow. even river crossing boats would have been enough.
So what prompteed the great Rama to build the bridge no one is asking.The matter of he comming to Dandakaranya by crossing many rivers is well known by the so called historians, who think puranas are absolute history. he did not build a single bridge across any river he crossed during his journey to the south , but chose to travel by boats.
So what may be true is that the sethu may be existing there eternally even before Rama arrived at Daniskodi, and Rama may be the first one to identify the submerged coral reefs during his reconnesense of the sea.
Rama probably being a wise general used it by putting some boalders on the top of the submerged sethu, in the process saving the time rather than building the ships.
And the next question we should ask ourselves is if we have to go for the sethusamudram project. Well if sethusamudram project costs say some 20k crores, and the allignment costs us more than 30k corese, then we need not change the allignment.Ous is a poor nation the extra money saved can be utilised in poverty eradication schemes rather than wasting the money u
RE:Why Ram may not have built that bridge..
by Niranjan on Aug 03, 2008 12:09 AM
The country is already witnessing communal riots in North India thanks to Ayodhya Ram. There are vested interests to bring such situation in South India through Sethu Ram issue.
RE:Why Ram may not have built that bridge..
by Rajendra on Aug 02, 2008 12:13 PM
Contd.
Well the extra money saved can be utilised in poverty eradication schemes rather than wasting the money uselsessly , in any way only about 300 ft is going to be distructed in the sapn of say 30 kilometers.
Those who are againist the sethusamudram project and tell puranas are rich Indians , they have no empathy for the poor Indians and they donn have interest in the upliftmnet and education of the massesThey also live a grand and luxurious life by enraging the pations of people by invoking religion.
These are the same people who sapported the Nepal royal king and talked againist the democracy of that nation.These are the same people who sapported crimees against humanity by advocating untouchability. These are the same people who sapported crimes againist women by sapporting the culture of Devadasis or temple prostitutes.
RE:Why Ram may not have built that bridge..
by Rajendra on Aug 02, 2008 01:04 PM
My point was commonsencical argument about weather Lord Rama truly built that bridge or not.
My argument was if we really needed the sea connection for navivation for the west and east coasts of India. If we need that, at what cost,and time.
You need to be either a Dalith or shudra to know about the greatness of Hinduism, being a brahimin you have got so many privilages which you and ur genre are afraid of loosing,if fellow hindus think rationally.
Regarding the bribes issue where were you when the MLAs of Karnataka were bribed by the BJP ,where were you when the BJP Govt sold the family silvers of BALCO, VSNL,IPCL and Maruti for a song ,where by making hundreds of crores for themselves and their political party.
RE:Why Ram may not have built that bridge..
by galilio on Aug 02, 2008 01:24 PM
Ram or Krishna or Naratha or vishwamitra or many
alwars,saints and yogis are not brahmins but belong to other castes from dalits to shudras to
vaishias or sherikas ect.so hinduism consist of all sort of people,all language people,all gods
of different differnt thoughts and different ideologies and it encompose many spheres of life
and hence there is no question of any caste in this discussion.BJP sold BALCO,VSNL,IPCL and
MARUTI for higest bidders and put all these money in highways projects and power projects
which was not pursued by present UPA govt which wants to put in sscp of sethu which is not worth economicaly as per latest study.UPA govt
allowed all multinational firms in commodities market and today you have cargill,australian wheat board in local business which pushed up the prices of all commodities.hence this is reason for inflation.BJP was better than congress if not good.
RE:Why Ram may not have built that bridge..
by Rajendra on Aug 02, 2008 01:34 PM
I would like to correct your self Mr qalillo
If allmost all or partly the saints are from non brahmin origion then why the hindu system discriminates people along caste line? And y they never abolished untouchability ,or even y they did not permit intra caste marriages?
These said companies were sold for a song because foreign firms were barred from bidding.
Then bjp govt fecilitated a ring formation where by they decided who would bid and how much.
The glaring misdeed was in selling IPCL to reliance as they were competirors and then Govt created a monoploy by selling it to reliance.
