Discussion Board

'Sabarmati Exp fire accidental'


Total 50 messages Pages | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >
ABDUL GHANI
Sabarmati Exp fire accidental
by ABDUL GHANI on Mar 04, 2006 02:59 AM

When truth arrives falsehood perishes:for falsehood is(by its nature)bound to perish.(Holy Quran 17:81).

This bitter truth is only about those people who were very very few(56) as compared to total deaths which was almost 3000.

This report sheds light on the fact which was not clear to humanity untill yesterday, but the fact about the deaths of our 3000 indian brothers & numerous cases of rapes is clearly known throughout the world, even as of today no appropriate action has been taken on the miscreants,politicians,police & all others responsible for the carnage.

If we (humans)did not do justice, surely, we have to face the torment from the only creator of all.Now its time for all of us to help governments to take necessary action on the enemies of humanity and take heed from the past so as to avoid sufferings of our brothers & sisters in humanity.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
prasad
Sabarmati Exp fire accidental
by prasad on Mar 04, 2006 01:24 AM

The attack hypothesis had defenitely its own inconsistencies from the beginning. Those who were probing into the incident are reported to have re-done the event by throwing petrol in to a coach and setting it on fire to see how it may have been set on fire if indeed that was the case. It was reported that the possibility of an attack and fire from outside was found to be highly improbable. Glad that the final report confirms this theory. Prasad.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Vakil
Sabarmati Exp Fire Accident
by Vakil on Mar 04, 2006 12:40 AM

USA was right for refusing visa to Modi. Finally truth is out. Modi should be tried in court for master minding riots, killing thousand of people, raping womens and creating orphans who are likely to fall into terrorism. All this was done to win election. Shame !!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
ramarcha kumar
which fire you are talking about ?
by ramarcha kumar on Mar 04, 2006 12:01 AM

At least they are admitting that it was an accident, you can not expect even that from them given their past behaviour you should fairly expect that their conclusion should be there was no accident and it was all rumour.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 50 messages Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >
Write a message