It is a pity that despite such a clear proof our so called secular parties are yet agree or issue statement. If it were to be other way around they would have issued lenghthy statement for the construction of the mosque &called for crucification of vhp activists.Are we living ina sensible world with such hypocrats ?
it can not be a turning point because it doesnt tells us that any 'ram temple' was there at the time when babar built that mosque or so called disputed structutre. ti doesnot give any indication of any huge or majestic temple of ram , distroyed by babar as has been propagated by so called ram sympathesisers such as vhp or rss etc.
basicalyy this dispute is of land ownership and we should see the whole issue in this context only and decide whether to give this land to akhara or the other party and let them decide wehter they will build a ram temple or mosque or anything else.
now that it has been proved that the temple existed at the disputed site,a ram temple should be built at the earliest.Ayodhya,Mathura and kashi are hindu pilgrimage places and these places should be given back to the hindus
Strange news. I have read about this report in the VHP published newspaper and Shiv sena published news paper almost a month back. And ASI has copied it from them.hahaha. Only a naive can belive this report!!!!!. If this report was opened before the judge today then how come saffron brigade know it in advance? can any one replies to my question. I dont think any one can reply logically because the ASI has bowed to the pressure of Saffron people. Shame on you people who keep faith in this report.
RE:Good Joke, hahahahaha
by Sirish on Sep 03, 2003 01:01 PM
No court will give its decision just on any report and i agree on the same. The court bench will obviously look for the proofs depicted in the report.
The existence of decorated bricks, mutilated sculpture of divine couple, carved architectural members including foliage patterns, amalaka, kapotapali, doorjamb with semi-circular shrine pilaster, broken octagonal shaft of black schist pillar, lotus motif, circular shrine having pranjala (watershute) in the north and 50 pillar bases in association with a huge structure were the result of excavation.
This is more than enough to say that a temple existed beneath the masjid.
Each and every person should be allowed to see on his own eyes and satify the same.
Let everyone vote on whether temple existed or not on seeing.
Atleast then one cannot say that the report was wrong or was written on any pressure from anybody.
I think this should be enough to answer ur question.
ASI dont want to get involved in the controversy beyond this point and probably thats why they are keeping their views on the issue vague. But unless they are very clear about the existence of the "temple" and not "any structure", how can the court take any decision?
Shame on Romila Thapar and other communist historian , where will they go now, how will they save there face .. for more then 50 years these people are systemetically putting our histroy through there communist lensses to our kids , now they will fight there tooth and nails the finding of ASI .Imagine the same ASI would be there darling had it would found out no temple beneith Babari struture..
