Indu Sarkar or not, however much BJP wants to tarnish the image of Indira Gandhi, she still remains the most powerful PM of India. She had the guts, courage and conviction to do things. One more thing. Indu Sarkar was passed by the censor board. If a movie is made on Godhra riots, will it be allowed to be screened? Or, the producer and director be booked for sedition (which is the order of the day)?
Review is mostly about about assumed right wing agenda and maligning Madhur Bhandarka. It has nothing to do with the movie. All I can say that reviewer and editor both lost their mind and put forward their left wing agenda shamelessly.
Re: As expctd
by amit shah on Jul 29, 2017 12:00 PM
review is as expected. the reviewer is justifying his salary. you don't bite the hand that feeds you.
Re: Re: As expctd
by aam admi on Jul 29, 2017 12:05 PM
what else you expect from Kerala-Communist- Congress background person. after all communists have patched up.
How is a movie on an Emergency theme rightwing propaganda? By his own moronic scale Nair means to say that any holocaust based movie is either racist or anti Semitic...depending on which end of the broom he fell off. Interesting fellow this new guy is. He makes even lesser sense than Rajasense.
Re: Artless review by rediff's famed moron reviewers
by amit shah on Jul 29, 2017 11:48 AM
but then to be employed by rediff you do not have to have any sense, just slavery_&_sycophancy.
This type of writers bats for freedom of speech, artists freedom etc., if any movie/advertisement happen to be defamatory to Hindu ideology. Even after Supreme court scrutiny on the issue how dare Rediff published this type of article?
If there was an emergency, there were so many corruption cases, why did we elect the same person as PM immediately after 3 years of emergency? In 1980, Indira Gandhi was reelected as the PM. Does that mean our earlier generation were fools? Definitely No... Because with all these that she did, she probably was still the best option. I am just being practical. Democracy works on the best option. So there is no point in cribbing on the past. When you blame an elected member in a democracy, you are actually blaming yourself as you are the one who repeatedly selected them among everyone to rule you. I hope ppl understand and stop being childish. Now I will be bashed as a Congress supporter and all that. I do not support or oppose, just being pragmatic.
Re: Chill baby...
by amit shah on Jul 29, 2017 11:53 AM
youarebeingchildishinthenameofpracticality.justbecozshegotelected3yearslaterdoesn'tabsolveherofherwrongdoing.
Re: Chill baby...
by Piyush Bhargava on Jul 30, 2017 12:10 PM
Indra Gandhi was elected not because of her charisma but because of the ineptness of the Janta Party, who's heirs are now the likes of Mulayam, Lalu, Mayawati etc.They did not let the Jan sangh function.Once Jansangh/BJP was seperated from these idiots, the results were spectacular and are before you.So please answer, if the Congress is so good then why have they lost.Lets be pragmatic.Congress has lost because of the corruption started during the Indra Gandhi Regime.Modi is proving to be a better administrator than Indra Gandhi.And that is a fact.Just being pragmatic.
If there was an emergency, there were so many corruption cases, why did we elect the same person as PM immediately after 3 years of emergency? In 1980, Indira Gandhi was reelected as the PM. Does that mean our earlier generation were fools? Definitely No... Because with all these that she did, she probably was still the best option. I am just being practical. Democracy works on the best option. So there is no point in cribbing on the past. When you blame an elected member in a democracy, you are actually blaming yourself as you are the one who repeatedly selected them among everyone to rule you. I hope ppl understand and stop being childish. Now I will be bashed as a Congress supporter and all that. I do not support or oppose, just being pragmatic.
