Even not considering the sentiment, The movie is completely useless. Those who like it because it is based on Hamlet , bullsh*t ... The movie itself is bad by all standards. Recommend watchin Omkara ...
This film is not at all Hamlet based movie. Its more of Kashmir movie with pro-separatists leanings. I was a fan of vishal Bharadwaj and watched all his movies but this movie really disappointed me a lot. Vishal seems to have joined the bandwagon of people who try get name and fame maligning his own country, military and people. I don't want to spend too much time in criticsing vishal as this starts serving as oxygen for the kind people of this mindset. Vishal way to go make next film critising your own religion and then get some international awards. Good show man.
Re: Low point in Vishal's career
by Opinionated Man on Oct 09, 2014 10:02 AM
Neither have you read Hamlet, nor know anything about the word called adaptation.
Re: Re: Low point in Vishal's career
by Tughlak on Oct 09, 2014 11:59 PM
Download and read the original Hamlet from net and then talk. Adaptation has become most abused word by Indian directors and unfortunately Vishal has been added to this list.
Re: Re: Re: Low point in Vishal's career
by Opinionated Man on Oct 10, 2014 12:17 PM
I have read Hamlet in school, and subsequently many a times, hence please dont speak trash.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Low point in Vishal's career
by Tughlak on Oct 10, 2014 06:53 PM
Just Because you read in school doesn't mean you should close your eyes for a blatant mis-adaptation of the story. The way you are using abusive words means you have stopped applying logic.
Mr Dwivedi, I watched it yesterday and was really difficult for me to spend time in watching this one sided movie. Anurag seems much convinced in converting Anantnag to Islamabad. If majority's opinion is the only criteria in deciding these things then of course suppression of thousand years old kashmisi hindu culture is well justified. However, but then be ready for changing all old Arabic/ Persian names and culture in our country where hindus are in majority. And for god's sake donot over hype the asking by Hyder "Main hoon ya nahi hoon".....no body in this too secular country is really interested in answering this question....displaced Kashmiri hindus are asking since this since three decades living in refugees's camp. Anurag or Mr Dwivedi should go there once and try to convince them that they are still very much alive.
In this movie, all who supported India were portrayed wrongly , either their character was wrong (mother and uncle of Hyder) or they were interested in their jobs or promotion (police officer and associates and army personnel) and finally even the famous sun temple was depicted as an adobe of saitan in the song. Still Mr Dwivedi would like to put Anurag in the league of Gurudutta...seems same school of thought. I have seen Anurag before election coming out openly against Modi...but got a befitting reply from the people of this country.. Anantnag is 5000 years old and still is very much alive...probably Anurag can not say this for Islamabad.
Re: Re: Another cartoon character writing a review
by madhur harlalka on Oct 08, 2014 05:10 PM
agree with you..the filmaker is a total coward and should catch first available flight to Pakistan for this damaging movie...i wonder how the censor board approved it
This film is anti India and Indian army. It does not show sufferings of Kashmiri Pandits. It thus shows only one sided view and not an objective view. There is no fault of the Indian army. They only react. Further, there was no need to raise UN, PLebiscite and nehru issues in the movie. The recent floods in kashmir once again prove that without India kashmir will go to dogs or Pakistan. Let omar abdullah keep critising India on article 370
