I have witnessed a few accidents involving 3 wheeler auto. They break into two from a joint somewhere below where the driver rests his back and which also serves as a partition between him and the passanger.
In most cases I have seen the glass windscreen hits the drivers forehead and the passengers get peirced by the steel rods which holds the waterproof tarpaulin. The rods normally pierce in the shoulder / neck area.
In spite of being super sport star and having lots lots of money,Why Sachin Tandulkar is mum for giving any help to Ms. Charu who really needed money at this juncture. Mr. Sachin what is the use of your money, please do something for the mankind.
Re: Charu
by Incredible India on Apr 03, 2012 02:45 PM
Why should sachin give money; in that case there are 100 such accident a day; should sachin be doing only this service than why not you; Charu has professional relation with SRK and hence she is expecting that.. nothing wrong;
Re: Re: Charu
by Avdesh Kumar on Apr 03, 2012 04:23 PM
Abe laddu gopal Sachin looting country and can donate something looting money from India Government. Government of India gving money like sachin etc. not directly to needy persons. India law allow only government to give money sport persons / Muslim persons/ Politicians but not poors / accidented / sick / hungry.
Re: Re: Re: Charu
by neeraj kulkarni on Apr 03, 2012 06:29 PM
If you guys are not aware then let me tell you, Sachin Tendulkar donates a lot of money to several charities. However he does not reveal his identity unlike these filmi celebs who want to extract publicity from everything.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Charu
by Prasad G on Apr 03, 2012 07:04 PM
I agree with you. I know sachin donates lots of money to school childrens for there education.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Charu
by desi twist on Apr 07, 2012 11:11 AM
Well said. In fact there have been several idiots, including those working in the media, who get blown away by Aussie cricketers doing charity. Folks like Sachin and Ganguly do lots of charity, but never make big bones abt it.
The accident happened on March 25; its just a week; lets say SRK might have told this two days after on March 27; currently SRK is in London busy shooting for Yashraj films. In this practical scenario the family should wait for couple of weeks atleast and media should also raise after few week; unnecessary dragging a star name will not going to provide rediff publicity.
though utterly distasteful to say, but it's not witty to ignore a good medical insurance cover, while spending money & time on partying. People should plan for future. SRK is big mouth, that's a problem. But it is not correct to make him responsible for bearing expenses.Companies also pay compensation if mishaps happen during job. For personal mishaps, people are supposed to take care of themselves through their wealth or personal insurance. I don't understand why rediff is making this "no issue" an issue.
Re: making of issue out of no issue
by Arun Premraj on Apr 04, 2012 05:11 AM
she must be covered by some health policy provided by red chillies..(hope they provide one).. yes.. ppl spend big time in malls etc.. but fail to buy a policy which takes just minutes nowadays
Re: Re: shahrukh is typical indian
by rs a on Apr 03, 2012 12:40 PM
u sound like looser paki......i urge world community not to boycott looser pakistan becuase the existance of Pakistan purely depends on international aid & they are just beggers...... so irrespective of whatever they talk / do, pls forgive them & continue to donate so at least pakis will be able to eat one time food
This Manoj Gautam seems to be a man of means -as he is allowed a lot of liberty by the police. As usual in India it is the money & power that determines guilty & innocence. My sincere prayers for the brave girl and her family.
This lady will go on adventure soprts with her family ... party all over mumbai ... met with an accident ... why SRK should pay ? the company in which she was working got the recognition for National Awards ... they were celebrating the success .. was SRK attended the party .. has SRK thrown that party .. NO ... then why should he pay for the expenses ...
Re: Why
by rs a on Apr 03, 2012 12:33 PM
During 26/11 attack, many employees of Taj Hotel lost their live. Tata group was anyways not directly responsible for the loss of life, still they took complete responsibilities of all families & everyone got compensation & salaries. That distinguishes normal employer & preferred employer. This lady is an employee of Red Chilly Entertainment, which is owned by SRK...... unfortunately not by Tata
Re: Why
by Umesh Sharma on Apr 03, 2012 12:49 PM
as an employer he has the moral responsibility for welfare of his employees, if he cooses not to gv will be motaly wrong and send a very bad msg to other employees.
Re: Re: Why
by rs a on Apr 03, 2012 12:55 PM
common guys, v need to blame ourself for expecting something like this from SRK.... he is just an opportunist.... he is no where close to Ratan Tata
Re: Re: Re: Why
by desi twist on Apr 07, 2012 11:15 AM
Actually, one simple solution for this is for every one in her company to pool in money to help the person. That way, it wont hurt anyone but the person will benefit. Another form of insurance at effect, in case she forgot to get a policy
