No more to add to the above headline...the article speaks for itself.
I sometimes wonder if it is the same print of a film that some reviewers watch as we do...may be they see a different version from what we saw? Would explain such divergent views to ours - at least for some of the movies. Guess that's enough said about the biggest disaster of recent times (apart from RGV's Aag).
Re: Well paid for article
by Sasanka Mahapatra on Oct 30, 2011 03:06 PM
Just one heart felt point the writer made above - he has absolutely no pretensions to be an actor - that is straight from the heart, and a fact...which many would not agree with...
Please agree guys R A One was a disaster - although hats off to SRK for trying a Super hero movie. However If I meet SRK I would inform him that we have been exposed to hollywood movies and dont show me or the others the same thing that is shown in Holly wood movies. Its not the annimation that matters however, the the things that you do need to be creative show us something new - i would rather say. Secondly with R A One its not the mistake of SRK its the wrong selection of a Director who just stressed on a superhero movie rather than a movie with a good script and screenplay. R. A. One is a failure for the director and not SRK
Please agree guys R A One was a disaster - although hats off to SRK for trying a Super hero movie. However If I meet SRK I would inform him that we have been exposed to hollywood movies and dont show me or the others the same thing that is shown in Holly wood movies. Its not the annimation that matters however, the the things that you do need to be creative show us something new - i would rather say. Secondly with R A One its not the mistake of SRK its the wrong selection of a Director who just stressed on a superhero movie rather than a movie with a good script and screenplay. R. A. One is a failure for the director and not SRK
I am happy to see Indian films at par with the international ones.Not only in price,publicity and Quality but in 'class entertainment'Shahrukh surely has etched his name in Film History. Regardless of what the Viewers and Reviewers say... the Film needs to be given it's due.All standards have been met and I feel proud to belong to a country that can match any other in Celluloid film production. The Media of Cinema has been well exploited by Shahrukh and his entire team... I congratulate them and wish them well...records are not here to be broken ,But surely,"Standards have to be set."
Re: SRK tries a Rajni
by ziaur rahman on Oct 30, 2011 02:51 PM
The question is not between Rajni and Shahrukh. The question is between Bollywood and Hollywood. Shah rukh and not Rajnikant is one of the representatves of Bollywood,which you should agree. And last but not the least,why you people do not identify yourselves by "India" instead of south indian or north indian or so on......?
Re: Re: SRK tries a Rajni
by Naveen Chandran on Oct 30, 2011 02:55 PM
Well Mr. rehman I believe we are Indians and not south indian nor north indian and if this sentence is what you believe then it has to be between indian movies and foregin movies - so please give equal right to both SRK and Rajni and not SRK alone.
Re: Re: Re: SRK tries a Rajni
by Jathie Kent on Oct 31, 2011 02:48 AM
Good reponse Naveen. Yo Rahman, stop kissing your Sharukh's back man. I am sure just cos he is a muslim and you are muslim, muslim-muslim bhai-bhai idelogy comes into play. I am sure you would say Khan's are sole representative of Bollywood. I dont have anything against muslims, but this feeling in them is what makes me dislike them. In your very own sentence, you contradicted yourself. You pea brain fellow.
Re: Bcos...
by ziaur rahman on Oct 30, 2011 02:53 PM
This is the problem.With a blocked mental setup no heaalthy discussion is possible.First free yourself from bias and close mindedness and then start discussion or argument.
