Re: YES..
by useless bollywood on Mar 08, 2011 09:49 PM
allooo mutters akshay and hrithik movies all went utter flops last year and cant even make the money what those theatres showing rajini movies made in its parking area
Re: Rajni sir the greatest actor ever in the world
by Kaka on Mar 07, 2011 08:39 PM
Agree, Rajnikanth is a phenomenan, in his younger days, he was something else as they say. His kind of hysteria is something that we shall never see again, once in a bluemoon it comes around.
He is good to watch in comedy and action scenes. His success even well past 60 years is incredible.
ofcourse viday will give her best with 65 Rajni because In "PAA" she was the mother of Big B and got best actress award for that role. It proves that she is well matured and can hadly any thing with any one either N.Shah or Arshad Warsi.(made happy both in Ishqiya) Big and small Bachan (in the role of illegal MAA and WIFE).
Re: Wht??
by useless bollywood on Mar 08, 2011 09:53 PM
first tell ur joker akshay to give up.. continously giving 10 utter flops year after year.. still not giving up.. latest utter flop Tees maar khan ..i got vommiting after watching that crap movie
Re: Wht??
by k prabu on Mar 07, 2011 03:55 PM
Its easy to criticise my friend. Can any bollywood actors pull such a hit consistently even at this age? - i doubt. Also just being a south star he could able to match the box office moola's of great khan's. I'm not a great fan of Rajni, neither he is a great actor like Mohanlal, Kamal, Naseeruddin or Nana Patekar, but he is a crowd puller in south and everybody likes him for his simplicity. Just watch the movie Endhiran and see urself, whether does he look like in 60's - i bet not. Say for example i'm from TamilNadu but i like Mohanlal & Naseeruddin Shah a lot for their acting skills, but still watch Rajni & KamalHassan movies. Opinions differ my friend, you may not like Rajni, but u may like SRK/Aamir/Salman/AB - its just a perception.
Re: Re: Wht??
by intelligent indian on Mar 07, 2011 05:20 PM
Rajni movies got hit even beafore relaeasing not because they were good but becuase ppl in tamil nadu are crazy of him and go in mass to his movie only to see him and they dont bother even about then story,action,direction they just be super happy to see rajni and so his movies become super hit before releasing in south so its not the speciallity of him in acting tis because fans of him so much crazy they make the film hit befreo releasing
Re: Re: Re: Wht??
by puzhal on Mar 08, 2011 12:54 AM
that is what a movie cant not be hit before it get released , there is something fishy in it , ya got it , its not a movie its a circus , where rajini is a clown , so movie circus great conpect from kollywood . great work carry on
Re: You south fools
by useless bollywood on Mar 08, 2011 09:55 PM
if u morons can accept a joker akshay as hero even he gives continously 10 utter flops year after year.. rajini can be hero who gives only blockbusters. latest utter flop Tees maar khan ..i got vommiting after watching that crap movie
Re: You south fools
by k prabu on Mar 07, 2011 03:56 PM
Its easy to criticise my friend. Can any bollywood actors pull such a hit consistently even at this age? - i doubt. Also just being a south star he could able to match the box office moola's of great khan's. I'm not a great fan of Rajni, neither he is a great actor like Mohanlal, Kamal, Naseeruddin or Nana Patekar, but he is a crowd puller in south and everybody likes him for his simplicity. Just watch the movie Endhiran and see urself, whether does he look like in 60's - i bet not. Say for example i'm from TamilNadu but i like Mohanlal & Naseeruddin Shah a lot for their acting skills, but still watch Rajni & KamalHassan movies. Opinions differ my friend, you may not like Rajni, but u may like SRK/Aamir/Salman/AB - its just a perception.
Re: Re: You south fools
by intelligent indian on Mar 07, 2011 05:24 PM
Rajni movies got hit even beafore relaeasing not because they were good but becuase ppl in tamil nadu are crazy of him and go in mass to his movie only to see him and they dont bother even about then story,action,direction they just be super happy to see rajni and so his movies become super hit before releasing in south so its not the speciallity of him in acting tis because fans of him so much crazy they make the film hit befreo releasing
Re: You south fools
by Naina Pandey on Mar 07, 2011 03:25 PM
Agreed. That would be better for him than romancing girls old enough to be grand daughters.
Re: Re: You south fools
by B C on Mar 07, 2011 03:39 PM
agreed the khan feet licking naina is having 145 wrinkles on their faces and still dont want act as a support actor casting... what a shame naina nai
Re: Re: Re: You south fools
by B C on Mar 07, 2011 03:39 PM
people in glass houses should not dream of throwing stones at others... naina naiyee poramboke
Re: Re: Re: Re: You south fools
by B C on Mar 07, 2011 03:41 PM
look at all khans all are looking like monkeys and orangootan's still playing as college going kids(3 idiots et al and then prancing sleep with all girls as young as 12)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: You south fools
by Ranjit Bisoy on Mar 07, 2011 06:05 PM
I am not accepting any Hindi actors nor saying they look very great. But Rajni should step down. His heroic time is already expired.
Rajni is 65 plus age. Even 35 years actoer casts opposite 18 year girls but does that mean the actor is old man.. offcouese not but the age after 55 is certainly u become very old and moreover if you are not maintinaing in real than you looks more old that is the case with 65 plus age rajni
Agree that salman,aamir,sharukh are 45 but do they look like.. They maintain themselves to look young. Aamir Khan in 3 idiots played role of 22-23 year college guy but for that he didnt used any wig,special effects,make up os duplicates and stuntsman as rajni..
they are 45 but they maintain look themselves to look 35 and someone who looks like 35 can never be called a old althoud 18 years girl may cast opposite them
Re: 45 age is still younger than 65 plus age
by aravind gopalakrishnan on Mar 07, 2011 05:09 PM
Aamir Khan may not have used make ups.However that does not deny the fact that he did not look like a college student.He looked as though he had passed college 15 years back (say at least his age was like more than 35 or around 40). This alone does not mean they are acting to their age.Even if you look like 35 at 45,there is no wonder.Looking like 35-40 at the age of 60 plus is good.Even Amitabh Bhachan was looking like 60 when he acted in Suryvansh probably at his age of 55.So there is no point in being jealous about a South Indian actor earning success by his merit.By the way,I am not a supporter of Rajini or hater of Bollywood stars.It is only the Bollywood supporters who keep on criticizing the South Indian actors just on the basis of looks.If we start comparing the talent,performance,track record of the various actors from North and SOuth India,you can't even talk for few seconds.The reason being that we have great actors with great records and sorry to say,you people can only talk of looks,fashion design or so on.
Re: Re: 45 age is still younger than 65 plus age
by intelligent indian on Mar 07, 2011 06:29 PM
Rajni movies got hit even beafore relaeasing not because they were good but becuase ppl in tamil nadu are crazy of him and go in mass to his movie only to see him and they dont bother even about then story,action,direction they just be super happy to see rajni and so his movies become super hit before releasing in south so its not the speciallity of him in acting tis because fans of him so much crazy they make the film hit before releasing
and as far as acting is concerned Amitabh and Aamir are at par and dont even think to even compare with Nasser,Om puri,Irfan khan they have shown there talen not only in hindi but in many hollywood movies
tell me any of your actor who is consitently approached by hollywood movie makers no way south has more talent
Re: Re: Re: 45 age is still younger than 65 plus age
by aravind gopalakrishnan on Mar 08, 2011 06:11 AM
Which Hollywood movie maker approached Bollywood actors ?Even if they did so,it was because of their popularity.If you compare the talent and versatility of Bollywood actors with South Indian film actors,it will be 10-100 ratio.Kindly keep your intelligence reserved and show it to people who do not know anything about Indian cinema.Fyi,Hollywood film makers approached Kamal Haasan and will be approaching Mohan Lal as well.Don't shout without knowledge and make unnecessary noise as an empty vessel,Mr.Intelligent.Comparing AAmir Khan with Kamal or Mohanlal itself shows ur lack of knowledge.
Re: Re: Re: 45 age is still younger than 65 plus age
by aravind gopalakrishnan on Mar 08, 2011 01:40 PM
Kamal Haasan - 4 national awards Mohanlal - 2 National awards Mamooty - 3 National awards Vikram - 1 national award Suresh Gopi - 1 national award Prakash Raj - 1 national award
Leave Amitabh/Naseeruddin Shah/Om puri/Ajay Devagan/Nana Patekar as we know they are great actors who are already recepients of national awards as well. Aamir Khan - No national awards but keeps criticizing all forms of Indian awards Salman Khan - Not even near to it Sharukh Khan - No national award so far Akshay Kumar - No national award
No the point here is I am not trying to tell that getting national award is the only criteria for measuring the talent of an actor.However, it is well known that national awards are given fairly to really good actors on most of the occassions.Also, the actors whoever got those national awards are one of the finest actors,India has ever seen (does not matter if they are not popular or not known in Bollywood) First,let the current Bollywood actors get 1 and then try for Oscars or act in Hollywood movies or whatso ever they may want to do..This is not in reply to ur criticism in Rajini but to your criticism on SOuth Indian actors that they are not as talented as the Bollywood actors.. That was the joke of the millenium.
Re: Re: Re: 45 age is still younger than 65 plus age
by aravind gopalakrishnan on Mar 08, 2011 06:12 AM
Please do not write things like this which has neither substance nor any sense.
Re: Re: Re: Re: 45 age is still younger than 65 plus age
by intelligent indian on Mar 08, 2011 04:49 PM
myfriend it seems you are saying irrelevanylt or you have no knowledege of hollywood films.
You most ppl in south india dont have knowledgef of rest of trhe wolrd cinema and then think you are best..
just google it out the hollywwod movies of Irfan Khan,Naseeruddin Shah,Om Puri,Anupaam Kher
and Slumdog and mighty heart you must know very if you know holly wodd movies at all.
and when you are saying they are approached constantly then because they ar more popular then you are contradicintg your own words that rajnikanth is more popular than any other actor in india.
The problem with you people is that you always wants to draw great points of their negatvies also.
like if rajni in real not looks good to be a hero than you ppl will say that he is very simple person but when sharukh has wrinkles on his face then he become old
Really dont be too much biased.. see the world and then compare your films with and actor with other.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 45 age is still younger than 65 plus age
by aravind gopalakrishnan on Mar 08, 2011 08:11 PM
Did those actors win an oscar or golden globe.The roles played were just very very minor roles.Kindly check completely.That is not at all going to make any difference and will not justify for any supremacy of acting skills.We do not bring any negatives.rather we are realistic and tell the facts.Even Kamal haasan was approached by some producer for the role of Osho Rajnish.Please do not make any comparisons with leagues of great actors like Kamal or Mohan Lal or Mamootty.. These gimmicks and Hollywood googlies won't work or justify greatness of ur actors.Rajni's movies were hit in Japan predominantly watched by Japanese population.DO you mean to say ur Bollywood mass is full of intellects and Japanese are fools.Common dude,don't extrapolate things.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 45 age is still younger than 65 plus age
by intelligent indian on Mar 08, 2011 04:58 PM
anil kapoor was in slumdog with irfan khan and others and he was in tv series 24 (vety famous tv series in entier world)...he is main villain in Mission impossible 4 against tom cruise.
Again you are lying that your south indian actors are constantly apporched by hollywood because if they were so then why we have not seen them in any hollwodd moveis so far.
Really you ppl have not seen the world movies and just seen south movies and think you are best and always draw positive conclusion only for your not so worthy actors..pathetic man
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 45 age is still younger than 65 plus age
by aravind gopalakrishnan on Mar 08, 2011 09:01 PM
The reason why Bollywood actors get a chance in Hollywood is due to media reach and using the language Hindi as medium, u guys manage to get a chance.That does not mean people who did not get a chance are not worthy.Please do not crack big jokes like lying and telling Bollywood actors are great in Hollywood too.U cannot play around with anyone here with your intelligent thoughts.The fact that Rajini has become the most popular superstar is causing lot of heartburns for you guys who have too much of arrogance and superiority complex.Tell all ur stories to ur own people and not to people like us..
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 45 age is still younger than 65 plus age
by intelligent indian on Mar 08, 2011 04:56 PM
anil kapoor was in slumdog with irfan khan and others and he is main villain in Mission impossible four against tom cruise.
Again you are lying that your south indian actors are constantly apporched by hollywood because if they were so then why we have not seen them in any hollwodd moveis so far.
Really you ppl have not seen the world movies and just seen south movies and think you are best and always draw positive conclusion only for your not so worthy actors..pathetic man
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 45 age is still younger than 65 plus age
by aravind gopalakrishnan on Mar 08, 2011 08:16 PM
Leave Naseeruddin Shah or Om Puri as we already know they are great.We know what is great in Hollywood and what not.. South Indians never have closed mindedness.Come to CChennai and see how many Hollywood and Bollywood movies are screened and how people watch them.. Ur the first person to criticize the knowledge of South Indians and their talent.. Who got the oscars for India ?
Re: Re: 45 age is still younger than 65 plus age
by intelligent indian on Mar 07, 2011 09:04 AM
yeah correct Arun.. dogs are barking here without any reason here as you dont have any point here to defend your rajni sir here so giving this irrelevant sentence thinking that it will make u cool.. but it shows you are dog who is running to car (rajni) without any reason
Re: Re: Re: 45 age is still younger than 65 plus age
by useless bollywood on Mar 08, 2011 10:10 PM
look who is talking about rajini.. ur so called bollywood badhshah SRK postponed his ra-one movie to next year after watching robot's success.... ur bollywood jokers SRK or salman or hrithik movie cant even make 10% of collection what rajini movie makes. u ppl watch only bollywood movies, so u think bollywood is great and all its stars are internationally recognized.. hahaha.. sivaji ganesan was awarded the great cheavaliar award and ilayaraja is awarded the maestro award..and rajini already acted in a hollywood movie bloodstone in 1980's .. so without knowing anything dont talk here. it only shows ur ignorance.
Re: Re: Re: Re: 45 age is still younger than 65 plus age
by aravind gopalakrishnan on Mar 09, 2011 09:13 PM
Well said.Also,once Marlon Brando mentioned that "Sivaji Ganesan can act like him but that he cannot act like Sivaji".Irfan Khan and Anil Kapoor got a chance to act in Slumdog millionaire becaue the story was based in Mumbai and obviously the director would have chosen these people.Also,if Irfan Khan is famous in some international serial,it is good but that does not mean other actors are not efficient.Bollywood actors may get chances to act in Hollywood films through media hype and since language is being widely exploited or rather used but doesn't mean South Indian actors are not good enough for Hollywood.Prakash Raj is a fantastic actor and had he got the chances what Irfan got,he would have surely excelled.The story in MI-4 would have been such that it would have needed an Indian character playing the villain role.So they might have chosen Anil Kapoor.I don't see any greatness in that and at the same time not trying to belittle Anil Kapoor.Also,as you told AR.Rehman,Resul Pookutty won the oscars for India.Ilayarja is a genius who already performed at London Philharmonic orchestra long back.Rajnikanth's movies were super hit in Japan.Kamal Haasan may be considered to do the role of Osho Rajnish for some English movie.We do have lot of such great things.However,we do not blow the trumpets like these Bollywood fans who no nothing other than Hindi cinema.It is better they refer the English dictionary to understand the meanings of the words nation
