Mahesh ji well said. You think people learn the reality off life seeing your movies. They are living it day in and out. There is nothing wrong to dream and act for better tomorrow. This is precisely what movies are all about.
Re: I like RGV's statement..
by Sandeep Jain on Aug 25, 2011 06:22 PM
Indians are all born to be servants. They were very happy under the British Rule.The Corrupt Govt. should increase the prices by atleast 500% so that everything is out of reach of the common man. Let only the rich survive in "the survival of the fittest ( most corrupt)". When such a situation turns up, then only will the common man understand the trouble & the meaning of ANNA's agitation. & by the way ... do vote for the CONGRESS again & again.!!
Re: Re: I like RGV's statement..
by JGNtheAtheist on Aug 25, 2011 06:26 PM
Con-party should rule for another hundred years; then not a single MangoMan will be left in India at the current rate of inflation of essential commodities.
Re: I like RGV's statement..
by radhika subramaniam on Aug 25, 2011 06:29 PM
RGV is a corrupt indian with lot of black money. Spo therefore he cant support a good cause.
Mr.Mahesh Bhatt can survive only if the corruption survives, as black money supports film industry. Its not a question of individuals but of masses, this Mr.Bhatt should understand.
Emotional blackmail is what Anna Hazare is trying to do. Any day Parliament is supreme in democracy and team Anna wants to blackmail our elected Govt emotionally. No body supports corruption and everybody wants a corruption free India. But is it possible to bring members of Lokpal who are supposed to be van guards against corruption from the heaven or another planet? How will you assure that they themselves will never become corrupt after a few years? So it is likely that we would require another watch dog to look after the work of Lokpal. Secondly having one more law is not enough. Implementation is what is important. We have enough laws against crimes and corruption. What is lacking is implementation of those laws. Conviction rates are very low in India.
Re: Implentation required not laws and more laws
by Tumli Basar on Aug 25, 2011 06:19 PM
yes if implementing agent is not under the control of the politians,as advocated in Jan Lokpal
Re: Implentation required not laws and more laws
by Arunkumar Puthenveetil on Aug 25, 2011 06:24 PM
A strong version of Lokpal Bill were it to be passed in full force is indubitably a significant preventive, if not comprehensive, measure against the rampant corruption amongst the mandarins and the ministers alike. But does that alone quell the problem? There are systemic changes with the help of today's technology, beyond the constitution of a mere "watch-dog" body, that needs to be effected to check this disease before it gets rooted stronger now than ever before. The promisory note of currency is to be brought under scan which unconditionally transacts to the bearer the "value of money" without answering important questions as to its "source", "destination" and the "purpose". The unprecedented flexibility of this instrument helps in navigating huge proportions of money through unseen channels. There cannot be a more propitious time to scrap out "currency" in a phased-manner and replace it by an equivalent "e-money" tranferable through wireless and wired media between "e-accounts" maintained under a citizen security account number. Such a system in place will allow the wealth of every citizen to be automatically accounted and even alerted in the case of malappropriations or illicit amassing be it from a land deal, property deal or a government procurement. Lokpal Bill is borne out of expediency and must see an augmentation by a machine monitored accounting system in the times to come.
Re: Implentation required not laws and more laws
by Manoj Gaur on Aug 25, 2011 06:24 PM
what would you do if you are in Love and wanted to marry but your parents opposed this...Would you opposed your father decision decision ?
Re: Implentation required not laws and more laws
by Prithwiraj Lahiry on Aug 25, 2011 06:24 PM
I do not agree with you. Parliament is not only the simbol of supreme democracy.But if parliament failed to do good and stop corruption from 1947 onwards, then definitely the CIVIL SOCIETY to come forward. And it is also clear that India is not a democratic country rather than you say a demoncratic country.What Anna & him team are doing , it should have to be done 50 years ago. But still i believe at last a good thing is coming to us to stop corruption.It is also a process.best wishes
