May be he is drunk or gone out of mind while seeing this movie. Seeing his i went to see the movie.. Movie did suck to the core.. Scenes are very much haphazard, main character of the movie is a nerd. What not? Dont watch this movie and don't believe RajaSen eitheR!
IMAGINATION AND REASONING ALTHOUGH IS WILD GET U THE GIST OF STORY...IT IS THE READERS WHETHER THEY CAN IDENTIFY WITH THE STORY OR NOT........WHETHER U WANT TO BE FAN OF DO COMO OR SEE THE MIRROR......
Watched WTWTR, excellent fantasy drama. Works highly on the emotional quotient. And WTF people compare this movie with veer. They r not even in the same genre, leave alone language..
Where is Raja San??? Just he gave 1 star to “Veer” really I have watched this movie last night and as I feel its superb movie, no bulgur and no extra action at all, and really its superb movie and great fight against of British rule, and everybody should fight who keeps their bed eye in our golden country as Pindari did. And very much true that Raja san doesn’t deserve to give review for this type of Epic movie or he likes to be Prisoner of British.
Re: Where is Raja San,
by ramen das on Jan 23, 2010 03:20 PM
so?...thr will always be someone who liked kitsch...some ppl also like blue or tasveer for that matter...it does not change the fact that they were craps as well...
The point of reviewing a book or a movie should give an idea of not only one can expect from the movie and this mean not only highlighting the story.One can also highlight the acting skills and how the technical aspects of the movie are adding strength to the story.But, sadly nowadays many freelance reviewers crop about who highlight only the story of the film and call it a review...but a review must be a complete package. Here Raja Sen has tried to do the same,but in the fascination for the movie has forget to mention about the acting part,he could have revealed the story a bit and not keep it as it a secret.He has done a pretty reasonable review.
Raja, this elitism for the sake of it in your Hollywood reviews is painfully predictable. For the initiated, your tone follows the general gist of critics in the US, fawning exactly when they fawn, booing when they boo. All one has to do is to know their verdict, and be assured that you are going to produce a version of it, making your delayed takes useless considering we all have internet.
Re: Magical? Really Now!
by ramen das on Jan 23, 2010 03:22 PM
so whats ur problem?...film has got good reviews all over..r u irked over the fact that it got better ratings than ur Veer?
Raja, this elitism for the sake of it in your Hollywood reviews is painfully predictable. For the initiated, your tone follows the general gist of critics in the US, fawning exactly when they fawn, booing when they boo. All one has to do is to know their verdict, and be assured that you are going to produce a version of it, making your delayed takes useless considering we all have internet.
This is hands down the sorriest, most indulgent messes of 2009 that somehow hogged some mainstream press back-slapping thanks to the creature effects and Jonze's proven directorial panache in the alternate/indie scene (how he elevated Kaufman's writing in Malkovich and Adaptation is well known).
But this my friend is a boring, vacuous misfire with some of the most unlikeable, self-obsessed creatures hogging the screen pointlessly navel gazing about how life's been unfair. Allegory for teenagehood maybe. It's hard being a teenager, but the writer/director team has really worked into a boring place with what could have been a 10 minute short. The self-consciously loud hard rock and the self-aware hip dialogue doesn't help matters, and it doesn't take rocket science to figure this one out.
Yes you are entitled to your opinion, and really the point of this comment is in my first two sentences: I think you need to re-prioritise when it comes to your English reviews. The posturing is tiresome (something your Hindi reviews are free of and I dig em). Just an interpretation of a reader
Raja, this elitism for the sake of it in your Hollywood reviews is painfully predictable. For the initiated, your tone follows the general gist of critics in the US, fawning exactly when they fawn, booing when they boo. All one has to do is to know their verdict, and be assured that you are going to produce a version of it, making your delayed takes useless considering we all have internet.
This is hands down the sorriest, most indulgent messes of 2009 that somehow hogged some mainstream press back-slapping thanks to the creature effects and Jonze's proven directorial panache in the alternate/indie scene (how he elevated Kaufman's writing in Malkovich and Adaptation is well known).
But this my friend is a boring, vacuous misfire with some of the most unlikeable, self-obsessed creatures hogging the screen pointlessly navel gazing about how life's been unfair. Allegory for teenagehood maybe. It's hard being a teenager, but the writer/director team has really worked into a boring place with what could have been a 10 minute short. The self-consciously loud hard rock and the self-aware hip dialogue doesn't help matters, and it doesn't take rocket science to figure this one out.
Yes you are entitled to your opinion, and really the point of this comment is in my first two sentences: I think you need to re-prioritise when it comes to your English reviews. The posturing is tiresome (something your Hindi reviews are free of and I dig em). Just an interpretation of a reader BTW.
