Mughal-e-Azam, 50 glorious years later

Re: Poor movie by Opinionated Man on Aug 05, 2010 04:59 PM The two filsm are of a different genre my friend. Sholay is my all time fav film, but I like this film too..... Can't a person like Roti-sabzi and Masala Dhosa at the same time??    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Poor movie by bony kumar on Aug 05, 2010 09:51 PM i saw this movie many time. when recently this movie was re-released in colour i was surprized to see a house full show after two weeks of release. I think its just matter of taste.so donot get disappointed.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Poor movie by raju singh on Aug 05, 2010 07:43 PM Probably it goes above your head.Mughal-e-Azam was made in chaste urdu, and all songs contain poems in urdu.Sorry boss please watch Sholay all time.By the way the dialogue of Sholay was written by Salim-Javed.This should change your mind now about writing any positive comments about the movie.You understand I hope.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Poor movie by Sheetal Kaur on Aug 06, 2010 03:08 AM Sholey and Mughal-E-Azam are both different One is a gangster movie the other is a historic epic Both are very good in their own way and both can not be compared.    Forward   |   Report abuse

Re: Of course by hari on Aug 05, 2010 11:51 AM yes..i have heard this movie has soothing qualities and is being shown on experimental basis in several hospitals to treat insomnia. Soon CBI will show this movie again and again to suspects instead of going for narco analysis etc.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Of course by gittanjali on Aug 05, 2010 11:54 AM huh, were you one such patient?:):)    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Of course by gittanjali on Aug 05, 2010 11:55 AM its a movie for love birds please and no criticism will be taken..hmm    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Of course by hari on Aug 05, 2010 11:58 AM birds!!!!! which birds???    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Re: Of course by gittanjali on Aug 05, 2010 12:11 PM ostrich and peacock..hahaha    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Of course by Opinionated Man on Aug 05, 2010 04:53 PM There have been few such films Anarkali, Taj Mahal, Razia Sultan, etc. Obviously, none of them had the finance which Mughal e Aazm had, hence the difference.    Forward   |   Report abuse

Re: Better ones in South by Babu Bhai on Aug 05, 2010 08:02 PM NTR and ANR look like donkeees.....Dilip kumar, prithvi raj and madhubala look royal....    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Better ones in South by srijagadeesh chirtapudi on Aug 06, 2010 10:24 PM how you look like babu?? PIG... this is what has been told above.. you north indian d i c k are tooo selfish.. will not consider the talent when it comes to praise south indian. Other times you remember the word all are indians. new words have to be invented to scold you people.. all the three last names u said - dilip kumar, prithi raj and madhubala are not less than shit.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Re: Better ones in South by gittanjali on Aug 05, 2010 11:46 AM What is the problem then, this is India, and Hindi is a national language...stick to the subject which is cinema!!    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Better ones in South by MM on Aug 05, 2010 12:03 PM Problem is bias. India has many languages, why to project only this as best Indian cinema by the media?    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Better ones in South by gittanjali on Aug 05, 2010 12:10 PM MM the topic is of Hindi cinema, when it comes to regional film I am sure the best of tamil and telgu or whatever language will be shown    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Better ones in South by Opinionated Man on Aug 05, 2010 04:55 PM No, the problem is your inferiority complex. Why do you have a complex? Even Bengal has its share of great films, periodic love stories, but people don't jump guns of regional jingoism. Grow up and talk to the point.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Re: Better ones in South by Kiran on Aug 05, 2010 07:59 PM but yours is a false sense of national jingoism    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Better ones in South by raju singh on Aug 05, 2010 07:50 PM Problem in India is that there is a laugauage called'urdu' confused with the name 'uindi'.If the dialogue is written in urdu and the songs are written in chaste urdu by poets why this is called a Hindi film.Do we mean 'film made in Hind (india)? There are only two kinds of films made. "films made in urdu about hindus / films made in urdu about muslims. Mughal-e-azam falls in the latter category.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Better ones in South by raju singh on Aug 05, 2010 07:53 PM Added to that there is another paradox-Hindi songs-When the songs are written in Urdu (mostly muslims poets(shairs)then why it is called 'hindi songs' ??    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Re: Better ones in South by Kiran on Aug 05, 2010 07:57 PM hindia and urud are twins born to the m0ngre1 hindstani a hotch potch belnd of locla vernacualr, arab1c , pers1an and turk1sh    Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Re: Re: Better ones in South by srijagadeesh chirtapudi on Aug 06, 2010 10:26 PM Gitanjali please wake up.. and accept the truth.. HINDI IS NOT NATIONAL LANGUAGE. It is one of the language just like another language. I have to scold your teacher who taught you wrongly. google you will come to know the truth.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Better ones in South by Kiran on Aug 05, 2010 07:53 PM heindi is only an offical language. Plus so called inidan cimena is representative of ppl inhabiting the northern terrain.    Forward   |   Report abuse

Re: Betther in South by Opinionated Man on Aug 05, 2010 05:02 PM Why do you have a complex? Even Bengal has its share of great films, periodic love stories, but people don't jump guns of regional jingoism. Grow up and talk to the point.    Forward   |   Report abuse