RE:BAD IDEA
by Joel on Jul 09, 2008 02:54 AM
Dude, kohistani. Catholics ar christians, since thy go to church and pray to god and preach the word thru old and new testament. They have the cross and jesus on it and all the stuff. Wher did i say catholics ar not christians. You don't need to be a rocket scientist to figure tht out. The reason why chrisitanity is the biggst religion is b.c of all its denominations.
Only a few fraction who knows the "truth" and doesn't distort the words, thts whts xianity preaches.
In all catholic churches you have idols of the saints. Saints are people like you and me, the romans ar the ones who gave this sort of status to the teachers who spread the gospel. Neither of the disciples ar worty to be clld a saint, since all of them have been ar not chosen as the prophets in the old testamnt.
These catholics jst make stuff up and insert into the bible and thy come out w/these saints and pope.
FYI, jst b/c i say these stuff, doesn't mean i am a hindu. Now your the one who is a moron since you blantanly put forth ur opinion.
This is a discussion board and discuss, not trash talk a person. You can do tht on ur own time.
They are not bad actors/stars but would need spark of SRK to make profit on this mega project. I think Kamal would do that again after Hey ram where he begged SRK to appear in his film. SRK can play Charlton Heston solidly whereas these two will look physically laughable. Btw i am from OOty
RE:It would be mediocre without the BEN HUR of Bollywood... The SRK
by ashok somasundaram on Jul 08, 2008 11:57 PM
haven't u ever heard SRK wanted to act in Kamal's movie...
It was srk, who asked to star in any kamal's movie.. Unfortunately Hey Ram, failed in box office & srk gained in the same...
RE:It would be mediocre without the BEN HUR of Bollywood... The SRK
by Subramanian kumar on Jul 09, 2008 12:34 AM
SRK sucks. He is just a mediocre joker who can romance (either with a married girl or with an unmarried girl). With little achievement, he is marketing himself like anything. He is a bacha for people like kamal and a small insect when compared to people like sivaji ganesan. Its true that EMPTY VESSELS MAKE MUCH NOISE. He can show masterity only on those masala lines. Please dont even compare him with south indian heroes.
RE:It would be mediocre without the BEN HUR of Bollywood... The SRK
by useless bollywood on Jul 09, 2008 10:39 AM
wat do u mean by the spark of SRK.. in which big budget movies SRK acted ?? he knows only to cry in the movies.. Kamal and Rajni can taken 100 cr movie in their shoulders .. dont compare SRK with rajni or kamal. just having some good physic dosent mean those are good actors. many great actors like robbin williams,tom hanks,jack nicholson etc.. dosent have any great physic ..first grow up and know what real acting means . a person who is born and brought up in TN and who knows about Rajni and Kamal will never say SRK is good .. so shut up go to ur bihar or UP .
I cant appreciate more; these two are role models... I think Tamil film industry do not have any ego between stars, caste fights, fan fights as we have in telugu.... i saw many times all heros attending all functions in tamil industry... i think our telugu industry needs to learn that even though telugu and tamil are both equally competant, tamil has an edge over telugu regarding this. i never saw fans of kamal fighting with fans of rajni
RE:great
by Raju on Jul 09, 2008 12:06 AM
You dont know anything about the tamil heroes or the film industry. As they say the grass is always greener on the other side. TN is as obsessed with caste as AP or any other state in India. Tamils may deny this as they usually try to keep a good image of their state irrespective of the ground reality (God only knows why they are so defensive ?). I have stayed there for 15 years so I know.
RE:great
by Subramanian kumar on Jul 09, 2008 12:38 AM
You are only living in TN for 15 years. But I am a telugu guy born here. I also have lived in Hyderabad for several years. Also lot of AP students studied with me for around 6 years in university. I can easily say that, caste based racism is rocketing in AP. In tamil nadu, its mostly the brahmins (not all brahmins, but only racist brahmins) who show lot of neglegence to others based on caste. Apart from that, caste exists in TN only at the level of getting govt. jobs and scholarships. Have you even seen own co-brothers butchering themselves? It happens in the AP and called as fractionalism. You first try to speak truth.
RE:great
by Sudarsan on Jul 09, 2008 01:58 AM
Go to Orkut man!!! Go to the communities of Kamal and Rajni. The war between them goes on, and whenever the movie of the other releases, you can have lots of fun if you go to the community of the other actor and read all the comments posted by his fans on the rival's movie...
star rivalries still remain, and even if the star were friends, the fans can never become friends unless there is no rivalry between the stars (for e.g. Amitabh and Sanjeev Kumar were a friendly pair whereas Amitabh-Rajesh Khanna were the rivals!)
RE:RE:RE:CONVERT
by subramani sampath on Jul 09, 2008 11:08 AM
hahaha.. it was english who made forced conversion. christianity dnt hav any history. Hinduim and other religions have very long history. You guys converts us forcefully. for this govt of other countries sponsor. you guys give money to poor people to convert them. U r also a conerted idiot.
RE:RE:RE:RE:CONVERT
by Joel on Jul 10, 2008 12:07 AM
Yes Christianity has no long history like hinduism, since xiantity started in AD unlike hinduism started in b.c.
But wht do you expect to see in xianity? -a bunch of wars and battles between kings. -acquiring lands and spreading the kingdoms. -establishing math, science, art etc..
In xianity is jst teachings tht ar meant to be taught to jews first and last. Jews ar the first people and the last people on this earth tht needed to hear the words of their God. So the conversion is totally meant from judaism to xianitity and thts wht their God wnted to do. Simple, turn their hearts away from sin and embrace truth and love.
Conversion is only done by catholics and jesuits first thru the portugese, spanish empires and british empire later on. The reason is they wnt to acquire thier land and convert their culture and religion is mixed culture and politics, and this is how the meaning of conversion came out to be. This is why you believe this is conversion.
Conversion is not preachd anyhwer in the new testamnt, only to spread the gospel to people who ar suppresed by schoalry teachings and man made religions.
Please read the new testamnt b.f listening like monkey w/closing hears to some group of preachers.
The new testamnt only gives teachings to apply in life and not to make it a political organization or to mix it w.crap cultures of any country.
RE:CONVERT
by shreeram on Jul 08, 2008 09:56 PM
IF YOURS STATEMENT IS TRUE (CHRISTIANITY ONLY CAN GIVE PEACE)... WHAT IS THE NEED OF GIVING PETROL FREE OF COST..
FROM THIS YOU HAVE SHOWN THAT YOU ARE ACCEPTING THAT CONVERSION IS DONE IN THE VERY CHEAP WAY...
SO YOU ARE SAYING THAT YOUR GOD WILL GIVE BRIBE FOR CONVERSION.....
