RE:MARATHI ARROGANCE EXHIBITED BY GOWARIKAR
by ramchandra murthy on Feb 17, 2008 11:27 AM
DP IF I AM AN USLESS IDLIIVADA THEN THIS WEBISTE ON WHICH YOU ARE DOING ALL THIS BLAH BLAH IS ALSO HOSTED FROM A IDLIWADA STATE KARNATAKA HA HA YOU BHAIYYAS AND GHATIS ARE ALL PHSYCED TO THE CORE . HA HA KEEP ON FIGHTING AMONG YOUR SELVES AND WE ENJOY THE GREAT INDIAN DRAMA UNFOLDED
RE:MARATHI ARROGANCE EXHIBITED BY GOWARIKAR
by dp on Feb 17, 2008 11:21 AM
Pakistani.....go and see whts happening in your country....dont peep into nieghbours houses
RE:MARATHI ARROGANCE EXHIBITED BY GOWARIKAR
by Sanjay on Feb 17, 2008 10:46 AM
you are nothing less than shakuni mama. you want to pour more oil in the fire and see marathis and biharis fight with other. I am sure you must be neither of two and such idiots are called third gen. I hope you must be knowing the meaning of third gen. Keep your mouth shut and let alone marathis and biharis.
RE:RE:RE:MARATHI ARROGANCE EXHIBITED BY GOWARIKAR
by ramchandra murthy on Feb 17, 2008 11:29 AM
BAL THACKERAY IS ANDHA DHRIRAHSTRA , UDDHAV IS DHURODHANA , RAJ IS ARJUN AND ALL BHAIYYAS ARE DRAUPADIS. HA HA
why do people protest for a film why are they not protesting against the torture against north indians or against sex discrimination, rape, bribe. Wasting time over a film, what is the gove and the court doing how can anyone stall a film? dont know what will happen to india if these things continue
RE:ITS JUST A FILM MAN
by bharat on Feb 17, 2008 10:04 AM
punam,
give such generous advice to radicals who is haunting taslima and great secular nation india is forced to keep her nearly under house arrest for her own safety
RE:ITS JUST A FILM MAN
by stav on Feb 17, 2008 10:17 AM
yes this advice should also go to the bajrangi goons who dont't allow valentines day and behave like talibans calling themselves as hindus and impose moral policing.
RE:ITS JUST A FILM MAN
by Sanjay on Feb 17, 2008 10:48 AM
jab tere ghar mein taliban ghusega naa tere sister ya GF ke sath valentine manane tab tu bajrang ko hi yaad karega. samja kya dhakkan.
RE:ITS JUST A FILM MAN
by peter on Feb 17, 2008 11:19 AM
abhe taliban badmein gusse ge phele ye bajrang valo ko bol. kaam toh kuch hai nahi bus desh ki marte phiro. aise se ek doosare se jagadte rahe then one day taliban will surely enter india. get up buddies
jodha akbar may be great artistic film, most of the hindu's will praise it , lovingly see it.boast about it that it will create great harmony and put india as a great secular nation.
but fact may be ,
jodha was a poor prey of the situation.
their might be many such jodhas.
that is why akbar is said to have 300 hindu wives.
what may be situation then , that hindu kings felt like giving their daughters / sisters in marriages to mughal invadors?
hindu kings were fierly brave but fiercely devided as well. every one was suspecting about other and could never put united resistance to invador muslims.
some founf easy way out by offering their girls to mughals and try to save their kingdoms.
invador mughal were cunning , they took full advantage of this divide and got hundreds of hindu young girls for themselves plus saluting hindu kings in their court to further expand their empire.
therefore filmy jodha is sugar coated hindu humilation and filmy akbar is glorified cunning mighal invador.
if he was really secular , jodha did not had her grand son aurangzeb a bitter muslim who imposed jizia on meak hindus.
hindus are so soft , accomodative , tolerant , secular that this religion has become great provider of converts for other religions islam and christianity.
pl. ask yourself how many hindus got converted into other religion and how many muslims or christians adopted hinduism.
RE:filmy jodha sugar coated hindu humilation , filmy akbar glorified mughal
by pappupirate on Feb 17, 2008 10:14 AM
Akbar and Rajput Kings didnt give a damn about religion. They were no different than todays politicians and only served themselves.
There were many Hindus in the Mughal armies and many Muslims in the armies of Hindu kingw. Even Shivajis army had a third of Muslims. In fact during the third battle of panipat the commander of the Maratha army was a Muslim.
Religion was less of an issue in earlier times than what most people want us to believe.
This flim will serve as a antidote to the bias created by Nationalist historians who portray Mugal rule mostly in religious terms.
The truth is -The Great Hindu King Rana Pratap's military general is a Muslim named - Hakim Khan Suri
The Great Maratha King - Shivaji's trusted Military general is -Haider Ali Kohari; Siddi Ibrahim was his chief of artillery and Daulat Khan were prominent in the navy; Similarly Aurangazeb relied on the Hindu King Raja Jai Singh to defaet Shivaji,Two of the highest ranked generals in Aurangzeb's administration, Jaswant Singh and Jaya Singh are Hindus There are thousands of such similar examples where Muslims occupying highest military positions and Hindu Generals being the back bone of Mugal military
We need many such flims which emphazizes on the shared legacy of India instead of the ones promoting exclusivist tendencies
RE:What will this flim achive??
by sadaChiddi on Feb 17, 2008 09:41 AM
yeah. aurangazeb was secular. he never broke any temple. he never killed his liberal brother. he never imposed jizia on hindus.
RE:What will this flim achive??
by nitin on Feb 17, 2008 12:43 PM
IT'S VERY WRONG TO SAY THAT AURANGAJEB NEVER IMPOSED JIZIYA ON HINDUS. THE BRAHMINS ESCAPED JIZIYA BEACAUSE THEY PLEDGE HIM THAT THE BRAHMINS ARE NOT HINDU'S SO THEY ARE NOT LIABLE TO PAY THE JISIYA. NO BRAHHMIN CALL HIMSELF A HINU-BRAHMIN. THEY ALWAYS CALL THEMSELVES BRAHMINS ONLY. ON THE OTHER HAND OTHER HINDU'S HAVE TO CALL THEMSLEVES AS HINU-RAJPUT, HINUD-MARATH, HINDU-KOLI ETC. BRAHMINS HELD A SHAT-KOTI CHANDI MAHAYAGYA FOR THE VICTORY OF AFZAL KHAN WHEN HE CAME TO MAHARASTHRA WITH MISSION TO KILL SHIVAJI.
RE:RE:islam is anti india
by nitin on Feb 17, 2008 12:48 PM
I DON'T KNOW ABOUT THE HADIS BUT I KNOW VERY MUCH THAT MANUSMRITI IS BOOK BY THE BRAHMINS, FOR THE BRAHMINS AND FOR THE BRAHMINS. THIS IS THE BOOK WHICH PROPOGATES THE THEORY OF DIVID AND RULE. BRAHMINS DIVIDED THE HINUDS ON THE BASIS OF CASTE AND SECURED THEIR TOP MOST POSITION IN THE SOCIETY. THEY INSTILLED THE CASTEISM AMONG HINUDS BY DIVINDING THEM ON THE BASIS OF THEIR PROFESSION.MANUSMRITI IS NOTHING BUT A SUGGESTING BRUTAL PUINSHMENT WHOEVER DO NOT FOLLOW THE BRAHMIN RULES.
