Rs.50 crore...its a shame on Rediff to carry such a story ! More than 200 people lost their life..how much does rediff values their life? I think rediff values those lives equivalent to the salary they paid the Syed Firdaus Ashraf !
RE:RE:the Dead paid with their life...
by sheetal gandhi on Jul 31, 2007 04:50 PM
screw 50 crores ,it can be repaid or to the max,investors might come to road ,but who the hell is going to get back those lost innocent lives ????
RE:the Dead paid with their life...
by Rajeev Pandey on Jul 31, 2007 04:48 PM
Can I know your views about Afzal, whose death sentence has been delayed by the (Congress and Alied)govt.
the sentence is very very very harsh.Sanjay is a reformed person now and he has already served 18 months in prison.The judge is extremely hard on this soft guy.The judge should lookinto the reputation of his late father.Not good for our indian judiciary...Ajay pal singh,Ludhiana.
RE:is prison term good for sanjay dutt?
by Govind chil on Jul 31, 2007 05:20 PM
no way its just 6 yrs. which would get cut by atleast 2 yrs over the time
RE:is prison term good for sanjay dutt?
by umesh scaria k on Jul 31, 2007 04:46 PM
Ajay, Law is not about soft or hard! Its about equality ! Your father could be the emperor of Timbuktu, but the law of this land looks at you as a law abiding citizen.
RE:is prison term good for sanjay dutt?
by sheetal gandhi on Jul 31, 2007 04:54 PM
i doubt if u r frm punjab ??? u r not half the loyal or strong as they are !!! to hell with your sanjay dutt being reformed or his fatherz reputation !!! sanjaydutt is lucky to be alive !!
I was indeed glad to hear the verdict on Sanjay Dutt, in fact, I am wondering why it took such a long time to sentence him when it was clearly evident that he possessed weapons. Nobody can be or should be treated above law. Mr Dutt may have so many sympathisers, but he needs no sympathy because he was quite mature at the time of offence. Moreover, Sanjay Dutt is not a very humble or innocent or polite character. He is generally very rude and arrogant. Judge Kode has upholded the value of law and justice of India.
RE:Law Respected.
by Shubhendu Choudhury on Jul 31, 2007 04:24 PM
Probably you dont know he is just a peanut in the whole case. What about Daud Salam and others. Is there is any law so that they can be brought back to india and can take a good decission against them, but no our law can only punish these persons who are really a puppet in their hands.
RE:RE:Law Respected.
by Jayaprakash Balan on Jul 31, 2007 06:41 PM
Dear Shubhendu,
Your opinion is perfectly ok. There are many big fishes moving freely in the sea and they may never come to lime light, but then do we not punish small thieves just because of this. In some or other way, atleast in the rarest of cases, big rich spoilt brats should get punished so that they too feel sometimes money and clout would not work.
RE:Law Respected.
by ramakrishnan balasubramanian on Jul 31, 2007 04:08 PM
Good judgement... Well said Mr Balan. Hope Sanjay Dutt learns his lessons in jail. He has to pay for his misdeeds.
RE:Law Respected.
by SELMA Colaco Serrao on Jul 31, 2007 04:24 PM
Moreover, Sanjay Dutt is not a very humble or innocent or polite character. He is generally very rude and arrogant.
RE:RE:Law Respected.
by Jayaprakash Balan on Jul 31, 2007 06:45 PM
I have met him and spoke to him during many of his shootings and have seen him behave in public and hence drawn the comment. But could you please tell how close have you been not to accept him as rude and arrogant. If you are part of his family, I am sorry to have hurt you.
RE:The verdict
by sheetal gandhi on Jul 31, 2007 04:57 PM
r u my any means complaining the jury ??? if u r an unbiased man ,u would not had said such a thing !!! ya,subtle decisions in our country might have gone ulta and seedha ,but this decision was a class !!
HONESTLY, cant say it is right or wrong. But one thing: the judicial system has not spared even the high profile actor. As he is not related to the blasts so he may have been sentenced to a less time.
The judge has shown that all are equal before the law. If concession was given to Dutt, all involved in this case should also have been shown the same. All committed a mistake according to the convicted, except those who are not caught. Had the judge been leniant to only Dutt, he would have been accused of partiality by the other convicts. Fifty or 100 crores, law has to be the same for all. Three cheeres to Judge Kode.
u went to temple but just think wt was the reason to go to temple bcoz u wer afraid. bcoz u have done something wrong .now u will have to pay for that . congress even will not support to u and ur family....
