ok srk doesnt deserve awards but what about rani, not even nominated. are kareenas and bipashas better than her, rani should have been nominated for kank and baabul and should have won for kank. this is an insult to her and what politics screen has played, giving the best pair to srk and rani, so that they dont boycott the awards.
so hritik was given the best actors award for KRISHH.... actually it was over-acting in the first half.. followed by Masked hritik in the second half...
where was acting?????
and KRISHH was not a movie to be considered for the award apart from special effects..the storyline was kiddish..... wish rekha, though terrible in KRISHH.. also would have got the best supporting actress award....
shahid kapur for vivah....for best actor.....what a joke!!!! ajay devgan....what da hell did he do in omkara....he was the worst in omkara.... and biggest joke of them all is hrithik....for krrish and dhoom 2....how can an actor be nominated.....for jumping ike a monkey....doing high jump long jump....with third class...special effects(KRRISH)..... AND WHAT DA HELL HAS HRITHIK DONE IN DHOOM 2.....DHOOM 2 WAS THE ONE OF THE worst films of 2006!!!! and i heard hrithk won for krrish....its so sad....that awards are given 2 non desrving candidates.... an d superstars...and great actors...like AAMIR (RDB), SRK(DON)salman(jaanemann) abhishek(did a wonderful job in kank) ARE REJEcted....even nothing for good actors like shahid and hrithik are nominated and given awards!!! star screen awards are the worst awards....ceremaony....ever!!!
