why muslims, earlier it was shabana than javed akhtar and now aamir attacking modi. had they spoken ever against and rallied against mumbai blast case. several culprits had got bail in mumbai blast case had thay ever made a movement like it was done against gujrat roits. in gujrat riots the target was muslims by the gujrati hindus and not the government has done anything, not a single case is against modi even than these people had stood up against him.in mumbai blast case where all these rsides, in mau riot case the hindus were target, had any one ever made any movement. these people fear the terrorist who are having guns to silent them but they are aggresive to a government against whom these people are biased. if aamir wants to join politics he should quit films and join politics so that he can be criticised on political level. why he is making losses to other film makers.no one is silenting him but he is on a different plateform of films let he should join politics so thjat he can be replied properly.
RE:aamir on narmada
by saanghi on May 30, 2006 06:00 PM
Because of people like you the foriegner are again ruling the state.that is the terrorist are daring to attack our country.
RE:aamir on narmada
by ravi shankar singh on Jun 15, 2006 10:26 PM
my dear naveed and sanghi,thanks for sharing your comments though in an abusive language but i have not taken your abuses. i am not against aamir what he has said about the narmada it is his concern but a wrong man on a wrong plateform. we all love aamir he is widely accepted as screen hero.why he has involved himself in such a controversial issue.if you choose to do so you will attract widespread criticism, are you ready for that,you may also loose finacially and your film makers as well. now if you have right to speak in democracy others also have.if others speak like naved replied in abusive langauage another from your community may took ak 47 and kill me.if you are advocating for democratic rights for yourself please respect that others do have democratic right to speak. i have asked some questions has any one from naved's community dared to speak and stage movements(as it done in gujrat riots case) against the mumbai blast case several of them got bails,and in mau riots mukhtar ansari enjoing full support of mulayam singh and no doubt he will be evicted from all the charges despite the court orders for cbi enquiry.do you have figure naved how many hindus killed in kasmi
RE:aamir on narmada
by Naveed on May 30, 2006 12:40 AM
He is not attacking Modi or talking about the Gujrat riots, you idiots. He is talking about the poor people who will be affected by the building of the dam. I had wished someone like him can stand up and say anything about the riots in Gujrat. more than 3000 muslims died, and you will only find excuses to defend it. it wasn't the normal hindus who did it, they were normal hindus intoxicated and brainwashed by the BJP. Check this out if you got any feeling of humanity left in you.
RE:aamir on narmada
by TRUE INDIAN on May 26, 2006 05:34 PM
This has nothing to do with aamir being a muslim, even he has clearly said that in his interview. And for your kind information,the people who got affected by narmada dam were not muslims(now what do u say abt that?) Also when he worked on people affected by the gujrat earthquate, it went un-noticed by the media and every gujju. were the people affected by the earthquake only muslims? the answer is a big NO. And regarding the development of gujrat is concerned, he never said not to construct the dam, he is just askin the authorities to rehabilitate the poor people who'll loose their homes due to the increase in dam height.Alas! He has already clearly said he has got no intentions of joining politics. Wat do u say now?
