Discussion Board

The awards craze and race


Total 51 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >
Ram
Of course it is Salman Khan
by Ram on Feb 01, 2004 06:47 AM

Hamara Salman Khan for Tere Naam. Kya performance, he acted well in both half of the film and turned out to be a HIT! Great going Salman Khan.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Santosh Mohan
Awards
by Santosh Mohan on Feb 01, 2004 03:20 AM

Urmila definitely deserves the award for Bhoot..She was soo good..much better than Preity.And Hrithik deserves one for Koi Mil Gaya.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
anubhav
srk all the way
by anubhav on Jan 31, 2004 11:02 PM

i think rediff r conspiring against srk. they work on one policy.all winners and only one loser srk.thats sums up their attitude.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
rajesh
this writer is mad
by rajesh on Jan 31, 2004 03:59 PM

this is direct comment on any actors capability.if srk cant do koi mil gaya role then hritik too cant do kal ho naa ho role.every actor has his own style of acting so two different roles cant be compared.and is this writer has no sense because it says saif was better than srk in kal ho naa ho.unbeleivable i can bet pull out srk from kal ho naa ho and movie will surely flop.whathappened to ek hasina thi.this writer seems that she hates srk and thats what she had written.rediff should kickout such writers who doesnot have sense
[saif better than srk in kal ho naa ho
]totally rubbish

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Shaz
ShahRukh-Top class actor
by Shaz on Jan 31, 2004 02:27 PM

The writer who has decided to call the world biased, himself seems very biased against ShahRukh.He is a world-class actor and a real starperiod.He deserves each and every award that he's received.And I challenge the writer,that ShahRukh can carry off any role with ease-all he need is a good director to extract the best out of him.
And who says Filmfare is biased?The year K3G was released,ShahRukh received no award.The bootom line-ShahRukh is a top class actor who does need favours in the form of awards to prove his worth as an actor.He is a star who dazzles brightly in the heart of millions of his fans.He rules the heart of the public and is aptly called the King Khan.What say, "Mr.Intelectual Writer", can you contradict this fact?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Raj
East or West, Salman Khan should win!
by Raj on Jan 31, 2004 07:07 AM

I'm backing Salman Khan all the way for the best actor. Come on, he has give his career best performance (even Hrithik) and both should be rewarded. So please, Salman Khan should win the best actor award!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Hulk Hogan
SRK should not get an award!
by Hulk Hogan on Jan 31, 2004 12:56 AM

These are my award winners:
Film: Munnabhai or Tere Naam
Director: Nikhil Advani (Kal ho Na Ho)
Actor: Hrithik or Salman
Actress: Urmila
Critcs: Salman (If doesn't get best actor)
Music: Tere Naam

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Michael
No, not SRK again!
by Michael on Jan 30, 2004 11:08 PM

Why the hell? SRK for best actor, or even Critics, or the people of India going crazy for this guy! He didn't doo good in the film. Honestly, I rather give Saif the nomination for best actor. The only two people who deserve this award is Salman Khan (Tere Naam, and my pick as the favorite) and Hrithik Roshan (Koi Mil Gaya), SRK can't come close to those two actors. And plus, look at the Kal Ho Na Ho review in rediff, and read what the people said about SRK. I rest my case right now. Come on Sallu and Hrithik, grab the awards this year!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Raj
Awards !! One more thing
by Raj on Jan 30, 2004 11:21 AM  | Hide replies

This is in continuation to my earlier message because of message length limit........

Tiger Woods, Sachin Tendulkar and SRK have so much fan following and awards that there are few who take every opportunity to criticize them as they know they cant do anything else as these people are destined to conquer the world poor they!!

Unfortunately acting in films is very subjective and not like Cricket where Sachin Tendulkar can win match for India and slap the critics. In bollywood, though to some extent Box office have some saying, however people can have different opinions. Manipulation of BO figures and biased people can always debate the quality of movie and acting.

Awaiting better articles on this site ...

Regards





    Forward  |  Report abuse
Tanoy
RE:Awards !! One more thing
by Tanoy on Jan 31, 2004 04:11 PM
You are absolutely correct Raj. Actually some times I can't help laufhing what's the way of measurment for those so called best acotr/actress and film. Actually i am bound to say Indian Film media is one of the worst media i have ever found. they are for particular stars. here they declare any RGV, Rajkumar shantoshi or Abhishek Bachchan starter film flop in first day and even can declare karan johar, hrithik roshan, barjatiya film a super hit with in first day. and i am agreed with you that one Tendulkar, Ronaldo and other have scope to slap stupid critics because sports are result orianted. But in Flim? look who are the judge same media people who are absolutely dishonest. any way My opinion is quite diffrent
Beast movie: Darna Mana Hey
Best Actor: Amitabh bachchan for Baghban
Best actress: Urmila for Bhoot
best entertainer: MBMBBS

Tanoy

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Raj
Awards !!
by Raj on Jan 30, 2004 11:11 AM

Are awards so important that we have to criticize SRK. He has been constantly bashed for buying awards/media, repetitive, hamming etc.

Why media or certain section of people who have biased towards their favorites, needs to do this again and again???? Just because their favorites should win awards!!

Just think about it this guy is not going anywheregiving hits after hits .He doesnt care what you are saying and has some better films coming this yearAs he rightly said in one of the interview that its not possible for him to experiment or deviate drastically from his image of romantic hero as lot of money is riding on him.

If you guys like some other actor and want them to win awards, please promote them in better way instead of making more points on how SRK is bad all the time. Is it because there is not enough good stuff to write about your favorite actor?????? Or readers will not buy it..I think both are true !!

People are smarter now and know how to read between linesso promoting favorites by criticizing others is not going to work.

Who cares about awards anyways!!


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 51 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >
Write a message