Companies which were formed only 1 year back and companies which had no turnover got the licenses- can anybody explain how? Why did SC order the Licenses to be cancelled- did the CBI court say that the crime has not been committed? It said that the evidences are not strong to prosecute Raja and Kanimozhi. So if there is a murder but the evidence proving the murderer is not there does it mean that the murder has not been committed?
Re: Congress Rumour mongering
by bhaskar madhavarao on Jan 06, 2018 01:19 PM
You have hit the nail on its head.Manish Tewari should hanghis face in shame.
The CAG, did its job in all sincerity at that time and presented it to the Nation. After that the fate of it is not in the hands of the CAG. All the CON party members are coming out against the judgement one by one & blaming the BJP for it , when it was the CON party which was in power , i dont understand by which logic they are complaining against the BJP. Now all are gloating that the CAG report was wrong .I am saying that the judgement is wrong & the judge is baised , can anyone counter it , bcoz arent judges in India corrupt ?
Re: It is now clear that 2G scam loss was only notional
by Vidyut Shenoy on Jan 05, 2018 04:13 PM
The very fact that the court cancelled all licenses when the case got underway, means there was wrongdoing. In other words there was a scam. However by getting a pliant judge to hear the case, cleverly wording FIRs & scope of case the UPA extricated itself out of the hole it created. That does not for a minute mean that there are no criminals. It just means that with the evidence provided by CBI (remember it was done in the UPA II regime) the crime could be established. It is now up to the present government to re-file the FIR with fresh scope and get the crooks to book. I sincerely hope the high flying crooks are grounded and buried.
Re: Re: It is now clear that 2G scam loss was only notional
by Sudarshan Nityananda on Jan 05, 2018 06:08 PM
If the judge was pliant, there was 3 years time for the judge to be changed. Didn't this happen in the Sohrabuddin case where Amit Shah was exonerated ?
SC decided that the procedure was wrong, but did not comment about anyone receiving money. Now, it's clear that no one received any money leave alone 1.76 lakh crores . If a Govt decides not to get more revenue and instead keep telecom charges low, it has every right to do so. Govt is not a commercial entity unlike what the NDA seems to think.
Re: Re: It is now clear that 2G scam loss was only notional
by Sudarshan Nityananda on Jan 05, 2018 06:09 PM
If the judge was pliant, there was 3 years time for the judge to be changed. Didn't this happen in the Sohrabuddin case where Amit Shah was exonerated ?
SC decided that the procedure was wrong, but did not comment about anyone receiving money. Now, it's clear that no one received any money leave alone 1.76 lakh crores . If a Govt decides not to get more revenue and instead keep telecom charges low, it has every right to do so. Govt is not a commercial entity unlike what the NDA seems to think.
Re: Re: It is now clear that 2G scam loss was only notional
by Sudarshan Nityananda on Jan 05, 2018 06:41 PM
If the judge was pliant, there was 3 years time for the judge to be changed. Didn't this happen in the Sohrabuddin case where Amit Shah was exonerated ?
SC decided that the procedure was wrong, but did not comment about anyone receiving money. Now, it's clear that no one received any money leave alone 1.76 lakh crores . If a Govt decides not to get more revenue and instead keep telecom charges low, it has every right to do so. Govt is not a commercial entity unlike what the NDA seems to think.
Re: It is now clear that 2G scam loss was only notional
by Vidyut Shenoy on Jan 05, 2018 04:32 PM
The very fact that the court cancelled all licenses when the case got underway, means there was wrongdoing. In other words there was a scam. However by getting a pliant judge to hear the case, cleverly wording FIRs & scope of case the UPA extricated itself out of the hole it created. That does not for a minute mean that there are no criminals. It just means that with the evidence provided by CBI (remember it was done in the UPA II regime) the crime could be established. It is now up to the present government to re-file the FIR with fresh scope and get the crooks to book. I sincerely hope the high flying crooks are grounded and buried.
Re: It is now clear that 2G scam loss was only notional
by Dipankar Mukherji on Jan 05, 2018 12:28 PM
The Govt got exactly 1.79 cr as license fees when licenses where re auctioned.
Re: Re: It is now clear that 2G scam loss was only notional
by PRASUNE JOHN on Jan 05, 2018 01:02 PM
dude that figure is combined license fees of 2g, 3g and 4g over 3-4 years. Ofcourse 3g and 4g were the costlier once and DoT reports also sugges that the loss was notional. Moreover the same practise for spectrum allocation was happening all the years from 95 till then.
Re: Re: It is now clear that 2G scam loss was only notional
by cm dhingra on Jan 05, 2018 01:04 PM
First of all the huge Salary,Status Benefits & cost of all facilities paid to him be immediately recovered in cash or from his pension. Secondly,he should be tried in the highest Court Of Law for presenting wrong Report,deliberately.
Re: Re: It is now clear that 2G scam loss was only notional
by Mainbola on Jan 05, 2018 12:57 PM
Yes, because over the years the telecom company built up their finances and became highly profitable entities. If you had sold auction at these rates, no one would have come forward to even Bid. Not to mention the scores of people who got jobs, the revenues and taxes the govt collected form these companies and individuals, service tax etc.
If you just go on collecting money as taxes without holistic view of the well being of industry, all you will get are Collapsing telecom sector, NPAs, joblessness and drying up of your own tax revenue.
Re: It was a genuine scam undoubtedly.
by dei gan on Jan 05, 2018 01:04 PM
Judgement clearly written that , there is no scam on 2G . It was notional loss. There is no proof against raja .....
Re: Re: It was a genuine scam undoubtedly.
by Mak Kumar on Jan 05, 2018 01:19 PM
The judge said that there is no evidence against Raja- they did not say that there has been no loss!
