He said he is moving to China because with the meltdown in China there is more opportunity to make money there. What he actually meant is that he is unhappy that our markets did not collapse as much as the chinese markets did. Now he is going to China , once he makes his pound of flesh there he will move elsewhere ...essentially he is basically a bear market player who will make his money and move elsewhere when opportunities arise.
Re: Read the Fine print
by mandook raj on Sep 09, 2015 08:55 PM
WE DONT NEED INVESTORS LIKE ROGERS. WE CAN DO WITHOUT HIM. PERHAPS BETTER. DONT TRY TO GIVE US UNWANTED ADVICE. INDIA CAN FLOURISH WITHOUT YOU, ROGERS! WE HAVE BRAINS, WE HAVE WORKERS, WE HAVE THE WILL AND WE HAVE THE RESOURCES.
Re: Re: Read the Fine print
by Useless Comments on Sep 10, 2015 12:06 PM | Hide message
you have brains yet you were servants to british and mugals for last 300 years.. why? what major invention had happen in india last 500 years... come to reality.. come back to earth... our PM is going country to country begging money
Re: Read the Fine print
by nitin shah on Sep 09, 2015 09:10 PM
Yes,he will return once he sees profit. He doesn't know how the conditions of a country fares, else to say likewise. What he cares about farmers? Only the media unnecessarily blares for their own gain, and doesn't have respect for our own country. Why credit him ? Do not value him.
Re: Read the Fine print
by nitin shah on Sep 09, 2015 09:10 PM
Yes,he will return once he sees profit. He doesn't know how the conditions of a country fares, else to say likewise. What he cares about farmers? Only the media unnecessarily blares for their own gain, and doesn't have respect for our own country. Why credit him ? Do not value him.
Re: Read the Fine print
by Nandan Singh on Sep 10, 2015 12:10 PM
Mr.Surendran you have judged it very well the all foreign investors have tried to coll esp the indian mkt.so that they can made money very easily and within a short period. Govt.has done a lot to stop the free fall of share market.
Jetley already failed in election now failing as FM. This is dilemma of our democracy that we talk about people power / vote power but when people reject them, we still make them FM or Home Minister (Shivraj Patil) and hence they get failed in their duty. Also, how people can punish a failed leader if you make them minister against the will of people. This is total mockery of democracy. Down Down this kind of democracy where 4 Intellectual-votes < 5 Foolish-votes OR 4 Honest-votes < 5 Criminal-votes
Re: down down Jetley; dow down Indian type of democracy
by hinduhindus on Sep 09, 2015 08:32 PM
Dirty mindset never accepts truth but ready to accept loot. What a shit mentality
Re: Re: down down Jetley; dow down Indian type of democracy
by mandook raj on Sep 09, 2015 08:57 PM
Did Samir say the same thing two years of rule of UPA, did he call PC and PM useless?
Jetley already failed in election now failing as FM. This is dilemma of our democracy that we talk about people power / vote power but when people reject them, we still make them FM or Home Minister (Shivraj Patil) and hence they get failed in their duty. Also, how people can punish a failed leader if you make them minister against the will of people. This is total mockery of democracy. Down Down this kind of democracy where 4 Intellectual-votes < 5 Foolish-votes OR 4 Honest-votes < 5 Criminal-votes
wonder why any one worries about this kind of carpetbaggers, who is worth only loose change 300 million! That is small change counted in whatever the currency. Just why do we bother. Because we know ourselves that things are messed up, still waiting for the same guys who messed it up !
Re: Jim Rogers is worth loose change !
by C V on Sep 09, 2015 04:50 PM
If what an investor said is not important, then at least try to realize the facts and understand what the ground reality is. Just defending the actions or inactions would not change the ground reality. And if you allow the responsible persons to sit quiet or do anything according to their wish, that would land the country, along with you, in trouble and one would realize it only when found out to be trapped. So, instead of defending action or inaction of persons responsible, just try to seek result from them and make them accountable for their deeds (rather than blindly accepting what they are doing, whether their actions are in the interest of the nation or not, etc. etc.) There is no point in blaming one and sundry for the failures or comparing with what others did elsewhere and then branding persons loyal to the party as true nationalists and the rest as traitors/persons against development in the country, etc.
Re: Re: Jim Rogers is worth loose change !
by hinduhindus on Sep 09, 2015 08:34 PM
These investors behind money not opportunity. Such investors always fail
Re: Re: Re: Jim Rogers is worth loose change !
by Useless Comments on Sep 10, 2015 12:23 PM | Hide message
Then why do our PM is going door by door begging FDI money?
He never invested in India without understanding the market. Investment in India has to be long term. It is not a place where one gets big money in short duration. A democratic country like India is very difficult to understand to people.
a business cannot be administered by an Indian Administrative Service (IAS) officer. Period !
Therefore also the economy cannot be managed by bureaucrats, because they do not operate the businesses. They must be only entrusted with collecting and counting the taxes to pay salaries of Govt departments.
The resources - land, water, spectrum nowadays, minerals, etc. must be owned and leased on, as needed basis.
The professionals - bankers, economists, etc. have their roles defined.
Job can only be created or destroyed by the businesses and to that extent the politically elected must be competent to take decisions. There can be no power vested in the bureaucrats because they are are not elected, but appointed to specific roles.
So long as India doesn't rid itself of feudals and bureaucrats, we will keep hearing the same nonsense from the cousins of East India company, who applied this layer of bureaucracy on the gas-filled feudals who could only release air
Redff published 2 stories; each contradicting the other.
Read this story and then go to story having the title "PM did not talk much, he was more of a listener". This story gives Modi has done well kind of picture.
Re: funny - 2 sides of the coin
by Manoharan on Sep 09, 2015 08:15 PM
Thats what a newswala's dharma which he is supposed to do. His job is to give both sides. It is the readers' duty to come to a judgement.
Re: Re: Agree..he forgot to Kick you
by niki surabi on Sep 09, 2015 05:02 PM
Ranjit is a wiser investor than Rogers. But then he is also a Modi bhakt and cannot accept constructive criticism.
pls checks retail market and ask to public how are they live there life its very difficulte and very hard, every thing is costly noting has been rate down rate of liveable items like vegetable, milks medicines evety things pls pay attancen you can win but you cant see the point to win
