Kashmir and Punjab separtist issues didn't start in a day. People were forced to go to that extent by other state people in India. The way people from TN and Maha is criticized in these forums, it is only a matter of time that these states will move out of the union. Both TN and Maha are in the top-3 economies along with Gujarat. Better don't loose them. Northies will beg for jobs and food. There is no point criticizing other state people and still say I am an Indian. It's hypocricy.
Re: Think before posting hate messages
by somesh jain on Mar 14, 2011 12:00 PM
If u think top economic states are doing some favor to economically poor state you are completely wrong. If Orisa, MP, CG, Jharkhand decide to stop supplying raw materials to industries & coal for power generation then all the so called top economies will be doomed. Infact its the other way round, these top states actually flourished at the cost of poor states.
Re: Re: New definition of Percentage by rediff
by Aniruddh Patil on Mar 04, 2011 09:40 AM
I suppose you are insane. Each person surveyed can cast 3 votes and not just 1 vote. so in every probability one cannot add up the total % of votes to 100%. Bangalore got 72% votes would essentially mean 72% of the voters preferred bangalore as one of their 3 choices.
Its a fact that except marathis, no one else likes Mumbai. This metropolis is scary, dirty, and has too many bomb blasts and terrorist attacks. When you leave your home for job in the morning, you don't know if you will return alive in the evening. And more than 8500 people die every year falling off from local trains or while crossing the tracks.
Re: No one likes Mumbai except marathis
by HeartAttack on Mar 02, 2011 06:12 PM
Correct your sources; i have been to all these cities and found mumbai safer and most livable
Re: Only Delhi is good
by lasha srinivasan on Mar 02, 2011 05:53 PM
so..are you going to sleep in the road?, when the city is declared unsafe for women
Re: Re: Only Delhi is good
by Amit tank on Mar 02, 2011 06:04 PM
Ha ha so true, Delhi is quite unsafe, and people over there are very rough, lack in basic manners
Re: Re: Re: Only Delhi is good
by Maddy star on Mar 02, 2011 10:39 PM
the common man cannot commute in a auto.. no meter...travel 2 kms ,they charge 100rs..moreover the Delhi ki garmi..
Guys, I have been to Bangalore,Pune,Mumbai,Noida/Delhi and now settled in Hyderabad. As per me, Hyderabad is the best city to live in terms of cost of living, social life, security etc..
Re: Hyderabad ROCKS
by roadconqueror on Mar 03, 2011 03:23 AM
Hyderabad is the only city in south India where everybody speak and understand urdu hindi unlike chennai,cochin or bengaluru.Hyd is like a north indian city in south.Any Indian can live happily here coz of common hindi and urdu language here.
Re: Re: Hyderabad ROCKS
by Arun on Mar 12, 2011 11:12 AM
Jus now u mentioned... it is like north india. So say exactly... "Any north indian can live happily". Lol.
Re: chennai should not have been metro city
by venky on Mar 02, 2011 05:52 PM
asif u r coming from california.. he is talking..wht a superior complex..dhruv..why all this..everyone knows what india is..we dont have rights to speak abt cleaniness..when i see this kinda of fight..i feel like there were a bunch of begger's sons who were fighting amoung each other saying my father is the richest beggar..hehehe...
Re: chennai should not have been metro city
by Akram on Mar 02, 2011 05:02 PM
Please ask all Notrhies and Gujjus to vacate Chennai, if they have problem in communication. Northies face difficult because they dont speak english.
BTW Chennai is much better than many north indian cities.
Re: Re: chennai should not have been metro city
by sakar panch on Mar 02, 2011 05:12 PM
Why are you feeling at the feet of a non southie like stupid rajinkant?
Why do you need to import Chief Ministers like Jayalolita from kannada and MGR a keralaite?
You may end up without a CM for your state or actresses for your film!
Re: Re: Re: chennai should not have been metro city
by howudoudo on Mar 02, 2011 05:30 PM
@sakar panch, you are number 1 regionalist and anti-national deshdrohi.
Though Rajnikant, Jayalalitha and MGR may or may not be from other states than TN, they have assimilated with TN language, culture and ethos... afterall TN is an integral part of India, so what if speak another language other than Hindi. Pls note that India has no concept of national language. They are real Indians, not like you.
Re: Re: chennai should not have been metro city
by dhruv kumar on Mar 02, 2011 05:06 PM
y r comparing with north cities, you compare with bangalore, mumbai and pune. and i said there is issue with langugage, metro city should support multiculture, multilanguage, but u don;t
Re: Re: Re: chennai should not have been metro city
by Arun on Mar 12, 2011 11:14 AM
What about English? Look at a global perspective... not a N. Indian perspective...
Re: Re: Re: chennai should not have been metro city
by venky on Mar 02, 2011 05:56 PM
Dhruv what brain dhruv u have..if u want to support multilanguage..will anyone reply if i speak in kannada or telugu in delhi..y only one lang hindi is supported????
Re: Re: Re: chennai should not have been metro city
by howudoudo on Mar 02, 2011 05:32 PM
It is more important for migrants to assimilate with language and culture of locals, not the other way around. If they don't do so, they are anti-national and non-integrative, a disruption in the life of local people (who are bonafide Indians).
Re: chennai should not have been metro city
by soundararajan srinivasan on Mar 03, 2011 12:07 PM
I have been to B'Lore, H,Bad, Mumbai and currently lives in Pune. Please mention one city in India which does not stink.
