MM Singh government is a big failure and thorughly corrupt and boneless setup.They are using pranks like rupee symbol to fool Indians that India is great and progressing.Indian rupee is not accepted any where except may be Bangladesh or Nepal.Indian currency has no value any where.In Financial markets itself india has pea nuts share and this country depends on FII money for health of share markets.If FIIs withdraw 5000 crores in one week the market falls by 3-4%.The beggars should stop posing like rich.The naked truth is India is a thouroghly rotten and corrupt society where police and judiciary are non existant and full of criminals.Indian politicians is full of criminlas.As regards this symbol.What was wrong in writing simple 'ra' in hindu alphabet? Then it would not be acceptable to southies. Hence one more line is added.The symbol is so sore looking to eye.Simple writing 'Re' would have been adequate.It is all comedy and nothing else.
Re: Indians should coem out of self exaltation and fooling
by ravindra avsare on Dec 17, 2010 10:21 AM
So far we were writing Rs. instead of this symbol and there was no problem atall. Was there really a need to have another symbol. This was gust agimmic of govt to show that India has come on world map as a growing economy.
Re: Indians should coem out of self exaltation and fooling
by Maximus Meridius on Dec 17, 2010 11:58 AM
It is called devanagiri, not Hindu alphabet. Devanagiri possibly predates Hinduism as we know it today, and if Hindu is used in its original meaning (Indian), then Brahmi, and all other derivatives of that script including Tamil are Hindu.
As far as a symbol is concerned, it was just self-aggrandizing. The rupee is not a significant currency of international trade and investment. Why? India's fiscal balance sheet is not good enough to make it more trustworthy than other currencies. Despite the woes of the US, EU and the Yen, they are safer bets.
Re: Indians should coem out of self exaltation and fooling
by punter ponting on Dec 19, 2010 02:40 AM
Agree, FII money is temporary. like philipines. India has no value of its own that make it superpower in next 1000000 years. caste, religion, and curruption not only the pilitician but commom ppl are corrupt. there is no future for this type country than rule by others, invaders like pakistan, china. Majority of indians look at obama as leader than mms or thier own so what u expect?
Re: Indians should coem out of self exaltation and fooling
by hanif muhammed on Dec 17, 2010 10:30 AM
ra in hindu alphabet with a dash it is. Your cynical view is well taken but a genuine effort is needed to put the millions of poor into sustaining class and let us not take away the good work done from Narasimha Rao govt onwards
Making money seriously makes people happy.... this is bs.... If everyone starts working hard to earn money and stop giving gyaan... everyone can become happy...
Don't circulate such bullshit. India was never and can never be super power. Itwill always be a beggar country, country which begs for one thing or the other. China is real true SP.
clean up the metros have regular maintenance fix pavements and drains
beautify railway stations,bus stations clean buses and paint
landscape OFCOURSE THE MOTHER OF ALL...fix traffic. the most brilliant minds of India are needed to get traffic solutions.this also involves HUGE FUNDS!as all cities,towns need traffic solutions ...all these will make indians happy.what i mean is HAPPINESS is not totally an internal thing, it includes external things,too..ie,state of ones surroundings *also can govt. fix wages ..ie,standardise wages in occupations.my feeling is minimum wage in india should be Rs10,000.
Re: Every Indian is happy
by rama anne on Dec 17, 2010 06:08 AM
sheetal kaur then how come a survey done during GFc showed indians most happy may be u need to check facts
Re: Re: Every Indian is happy
by ravindra avsare on Dec 17, 2010 10:26 AM
Did the surveyors come to you? Who knows whom they surveyed and how many no of people they surveyed? In country like India where the population is more than 140 Crores, a sample survey by just interviewing few thousands is really reliable?
Re: And
by ravindra avsare on Dec 17, 2010 10:28 AM
Ambedkar must be crying in the heaven watching the indian politicians using his constitution for self-help and dirty politics.
Re: And
by rama anne on Dec 17, 2010 06:06 AM
Police officer ambedkar wrote a good constitution Constitution rules are broken by political elite ,,that is the problem Hope is still alive in India ,,if we get corruption down and get good leaders who can drive indias agriculture we can achieve the growth and people will climb the ladder
Re: Re: And
by lolan on Dec 17, 2010 03:27 AM
=), Don't ask questions; police officer will get offended. There are some people who comments on each and every news item. And they think they know everything. Let it be, why to change such notions ?
Re: Re: Re: And
by abhishek mawle on Dec 17, 2010 09:22 AM
Direct Consensus democracy
The advent of Electronic Voting Machine, Internet, Mobile phones etc. We can easily bring direct consensus democracy through Electronic Voting Machine/Internet/Mobile Phone etc to India as is done in Switzerland successfully for the past several years since 1890. The need of the hour for most of the democracies across the world is to transition from representative democracy to Direct Consensus democracy.
1.) I have a suggestion for it by introducing a new constitution with bicameral parliament like the one we have right now. Important difference would be the upper house would comprise of engineers, graduates, post graduates, doctors, arts, commerce, finance and other qualified experts from various fields and walks of life who would be duly elected by graduates across the country in election over internet by use of Virtual Private Network set up by election commission of India.
2.) The lower house would comprise of elected representatives elected by rest of the people. In order to pass a law, legislation or bill both the houses need to agree by simple majority.
3.) In case they do not then the bill is not passed.
4.) In case the bill is passed and the people are satisfied it will become law.
Re: Re: Re: Re: And
by abhishek mawle on Dec 17, 2010 09:24 AM
5.) If people are dissatisfied they can get a referendum by getting signatures of 50,000 citizens and then invitation for suggestion or recommendation from citizens from all parts of India would be invited on a national website, top 10 popular suggestion would be judged by calling graduate citizens across the country to vote on them after deciding the top 10 suggestions.
6.) The top 10 suggestion can be put to national referendum based on the most polled suggestion by people of India it should be made a law, legislation or bill and the earlier law/laws is to be replaced with it.
7.) The citizens will have the power to recall any government official whether elected/selected or appointed including Judges.
8.) The citizens of India can create/amend/delete any law/legislation or bill at any point of time by getting signatures of at least 50,000 citizens followed by the procedure mentioned above.
9.) In case if there is a disagreement between graduate citizens and less educated citizens then the whole country will vote on a law proposed by less educated citizens and would be passed if it gets 70% votes majority.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: And
by abhishek mawle on Dec 17, 2010 09:26 AM
10.) The Prime Minster would be selected from a pool of nominations filed by the nominees themselves on the Prime Ministerial election website to be hosted by Election Commission of India along with each Prime Ministerial candidates Qualifications, Detailed Profile including past performance in posts elected or selected, his manifesto, his vision and his criminal record and all the statements needs to be duly verified and if any citizen notices any discrepancy in nomination documents of a nominee candidate he should inform the same to Election Commission of India and the commission needs to reply with in 48 hours of lodging of complaint and if found to be true the profile needs to be altered with new facts discovered along with a stiff penalty decided by the court.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: And
by abhishek mawle on Dec 17, 2010 09:28 AM
11.) The Prime Minister would be elected by people after going through all the profiles of Prime Ministerial Nominations in six months from the date of posting on the national website and after having a national media debate on media every third Sunday for Six months. The period of voting would be six months; the voting process would allow people to rate the candidates from 0-10 points. The top 10 nominees who win the highest number of points will be final nominees. once the top 10 nominees are known then there would be a nation wide election to chose one amongst them. The nominee who wins the highest number of votes will be declared Prime Minister for 10 Years. The Prime Minster can be recalled by the citizens at any point of time during his tenure by initiating recall election across the country, To initiate recall elections at least 1,00,000 Citizens need to sign a recall petition by citing the reasons about the same, once 1,00,000 signatures are attained the process needs to started within a month’s time and completed within three months.
12.) The procedure for nomination of Chief Minister would be the same except that it would be conducted by State Election Commission.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: And
by abhishek mawle on Dec 17, 2010 09:29 AM
13.) The procedure for election of Chief Minister would be the same except that this would happen at the state level. To initiate recall of Chief Minister at least 50,000 Citizens from the respective state need to sign a recall petition by citing the reasons about the same, once 50,000 signatures are attained the process needs to started within a month’s time and completed within three months.
14.) The transition from representative democracy should be done in a phased manner in order to prevent confusion first by implementing in the order mentioned Lok Sabha members, Rajya Sabha members, Prime Minister, Sate Legislative Assembly members, State Legislative Council members, Chief Minister, Muncipal Wards, Panchayat samithi and other electoral positions.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: And
by abhishek mawle on Dec 17, 2010 09:30 AM
The Ten fundamental rights recognised by the constitution would be
a) Verifiable voting with receipt issued to voter along with his choices mentioned. b) The right to service. c) The right to information. d) The right to debate. e) The right to referendum. f) The right to recall elected/selected/appointed representatives. g) The right to create/amend/delete any law/legislation or bill. h) The right to equality. i) The right to freedom. j) The right to freedom from exploitation. k) The right to freedom of religion. l) Cultural and educational rights.
15.) Political party system would be unconstitutional.
16.) Questions or Suggestions are welcome about my proposed Modern Constitution of India. Doing the same thing again and again, expecting different results is insanity. Let us get rid of this nuisance.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: And
by cool Soft on Dec 17, 2010 10:20 AM
The Agenda to save India. Cut all corrupt hands Kill all politicians who eat public money. Put educated, stragegic thinkers in power Make sure the funds for development actually are spent on development. Execute all terrorists and drug traffickers
Re: Re: Great
by Virendra Patel on Dec 17, 2010 03:21 AM
Tell me something new. You're right, India is a dirty, corrupt, backward and terrorist state of 1.2 billion, that has been raped by the Moghuls, The British, The Portugese. The USA, Israel and the IMF/World Bank.
Re: Re: Great
by Sheetal Kaur on Dec 17, 2010 03:20 AM
Well one dirty fish make the whole pond dirty and in the case of India the dirty fish is the Gandhi's and the Congress.
Re: Re: Great
by rama anne on Dec 17, 2010 06:09 AM
either you should emigrate from india or cut off all ties with India why not do it than just barking mad
Re: Re: Re: Great
by Virendra Patel on Dec 18, 2010 11:06 PM
I take it you haven't heard of freedom of speech Rama? Not everyone can afford to leave India. There are lots of people in other countries who dislike their own country and have the freedom of right to express their opinion, whether you like it or not. You don't agree with freedom of speech, you agree to put up and shut up.
