Dt: 10th March 2007 From: Partha Das Sharma Sharmapd1@rediffmail.com
Sub: Number of Indian billionaire in Forbes list surpasses Japanese.
It heartening to note that, number of Indian billionaire in Forbes 100 list, surpasses Japanese.
At this juncture, it is important to know that quality of management, i.e., handling of technology, handling of know-how; handling and creating pool of world class human resources for business enterprise etc. made by mostly family run Indian business personnel. Creating wealth for %u2018QUALITY%u2019 matters most. It comes to attitude or outlook of business enterprise in respect of maintaining technologically excellence, creating and maintaining world class human resources where only excellence thrives and not assessing performances merely based on the owner%u2019s community or back biting etc., which hampers creation of pool of quality manpower.
I request forbes to release list of Richest Politicians of world,i sure Indian politics will beat others comprehensively. In Billioanres list 44% are Americans, but in politicians list 50% would be Indians. pls. suggest the Indian richest politicians,give 1st 10 names.
Bill and Warren are big and great billionaire the difference between them and others is the philanthropy they are doing, Warren has donated 80% of his wealth. This something extraordinary not seeing in others and Indian billionaires, these people are mostly spend their money in big cars, Jumbo Aircraft, buying big houses, palaces, spend money in grand wedding, giving grand parties etc.
RE:The Difference Between Bill & Warren with others
by Venkatakrishnan Guruprasad on Mar 10, 2007 10:52 AM
boss, you don't have money. SO you could complain about Indian Billionaires. If you have you'd also remain like them.
RE:RE:The Difference Between Bill & Warren with others
by execute on Mar 10, 2007 11:00 AM
Boss, i am not criticizing them i am just telling their hobbies, anyhow it's their money they are free to use it as they wish. But boss to give you money need big heart. less or more is not important
Bill gates will leave his legacy not as the king of the microsoft empire but for all the philanthropy he is doing. His inspiration is the philanthropic focus of David Rockafeller.
RE:RE:RE:william gates
by roshma on Mar 10, 2007 10:30 AM
no mr.reddy.. rajkishore is right..what he meant was "typo" and not "type"..TYPO is the right woed to b used here...coz rajkishore had made a spelling mistake in his former comment..he has spelt david rockefeller's mane incorrectly..TYPO means spelling error.esp in something that has been set in type.
i am a very ordinary person and live for our day to day life. what we can do and say who is billionaire and who is millionaire.what they give to us.our life would be same for ever.
RE:what to do
by rajkishore gorla on Mar 10, 2007 04:42 AM
not just the millions of jobs they have created but also as an inspiration to the millions of youngsters who grow up idolizing him. He was not a millionare when he was born. He made hsi empire with his work ethic, grit and intellect. There is a lot to learn for every common man.
RE:what to do
by M V Jayashree on Mar 10, 2007 06:48 AM
Dear Syed, Why this mourning. No one made those billionairs who they are. They all went through struggle and fight to become successful. Did you read the article carefully. It says 60% of them are self made first generation billionaires. Why are you waiting for someone to come and uplift you. If you want blessings be a blessing for the world first.
RE:I think LALU should top the list, Lotting Bihar and now Railways
by mihir on Mar 09, 2007 10:38 PM
So much so that Bill Gate can count his wealth, but Lalu wealth is so much that this is also not possible. Why? Lalu failed in nursery, so dont know count after 100$ billion
RE:RE:I think LALU should top the list, Lotting Bihar and now Railways
by Vishnu on Mar 10, 2007 04:07 AM
Seems u r big idiot than lalu.. Get ur facts right dude... He is MA from patna university..It should be better that u i guess.
RE:RE:RE:I think LALU should top the list, Lotting Bihar and now Railways
by ABC XYZ on Mar 10, 2007 05:44 AM
We all know how one can get a MA degree from Patna University. Pay 'em and get the degree. Do you know Lalu's eldest daughter Misa, now residing in US (because she is married to a techy working in US), was granted a Medical degree from Ranchi Medical College without her seldom attending classes. Lalu's son got selected in Bihar Cricket Team not because of his calibre but because he was CM's son. So, let's not talk about Lalu's education background. But, I would agree to the fact that Lalu is not an idiot, he is a very intelligent guy (he poses to be a bhola bhala idiotsa person). One's intelligence has no link to his education. I have met scores of Masters degree holder with zero intelligence.
RE:RE:RE:I think LALU should top the list, Lotting Bihar and now Railways
by Jurist Jurist on Mar 10, 2007 09:49 AM
Hello Tariq,
In such a case Why Lallu didn't devolop Bihar during his more than a decade rule, if he is the reason for railway's success? Railway makes profit not because of Lallu alone but because of over all increase in traffic and the economic boom in India. Lallu took Bihar to 18 th century and thanks to Bihar people by electing Mr Nithish now it can atleast reach 19th century. Finally God Saved Bihar.
RE:RE:RE:RE:I think LALU should top the list, Lotting Bihar and now Railways
by Francis Josephkumar on Mar 10, 2007 11:36 AM
It is a fact that Lalu made Railways profittable. It is prudent to pat on the back when it is due as much as to hit on the head when necessary. Consider case by case basis.
RE:RE:RE:RE:I think LALU should top the list, Lotting Bihar and now Railways
by Anees M on Mar 10, 2007 12:05 PM
dear jurist u r wrong. it was lalu's decision in the first Railway GM's meeting he attended to make the wagon loading unloading time to 24hrs(in 3 8hr)shifts from the old 8hr/day. This increased the railways carrying capacity by around 35% without the investment of a single penny. The total turnaround time for a wagon came down to 5 days from 8days which attracted the industries back to railways. Further reduction in transport cahrges lured more traffic improving the efficiency. The credit goes 100% to lalu mainly because "he has the guts to control the beurocrats which many indian politicians doesnt have.
