It should be 1 0 4 4 4 2 8 0 1 4 3 8 5 1 2 7 1 6 9 = 70. (and not 69 as claimed by author). So either the card he has taken as example is not fake or the whole article is fake. you decide.
It should be 1 0 4 4 4 2 8 0 1 4 3 8 5 1 2 7 1 6 9 = 70. (and not 69 as claimed by author). So either the card he has taken as example is not fake or the whole article is fake. you decide.
This is not useful for holder of credit card but may be useful for the merchant or the vendor who is going to use this; Still there is nothing to be sure about the expiry of the valid card
